Merge tag 'balancenuma-v11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mel/linux-balancenuma

Pull Automatic NUMA Balancing bare-bones from Mel Gorman:
 "There are three implementations for NUMA balancing, this tree
  (balancenuma), numacore which has been developed in tip/master and
  autonuma which is in aa.git.

  In almost all respects balancenuma is the dumbest of the three because
  its main impact is on the VM side with no attempt to be smart about
  scheduling.  In the interest of getting the ball rolling, it would be
  desirable to see this much merged for 3.8 with the view to building
  scheduler smarts on top and adapting the VM where required for 3.9.

  The most recent set of comparisons available from different people are

    mel:    https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/9/108
    mingo:  https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/7/331
    tglx:   https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/437
    srikar: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/397

  The results are a mixed bag.  In my own tests, balancenuma does
  reasonably well.  It's dumb as rocks and does not regress against
  mainline.  On the other hand, Ingo's tests shows that balancenuma is
  incapable of converging for this workloads driven by perf which is bad
  but is potentially explained by the lack of scheduler smarts.  Thomas'
  results show balancenuma improves on mainline but falls far short of
  numacore or autonuma.  Srikar's results indicate we all suffer on a
  large machine with imbalanced node sizes.

  My own testing showed that recent numacore results have improved
  dramatically, particularly in the last week but not universally.
  We've butted heads heavily on system CPU usage and high levels of
  migration even when it shows that overall performance is better.
  There are also cases where it regresses.  Of interest is that for
  specjbb in some configurations it will regress for lower numbers of
  warehouses and show gains for higher numbers which is not reported by
  the tool by default and sometimes missed in treports.  Recently I
  reported for numacore that the JVM was crashing with
  NullPointerExceptions but currently it's unclear what the source of
  this problem is.  Initially I thought it was in how numacore batch
  handles PTEs but I'm no longer think this is the case.  It's possible
  numacore is just able to trigger it due to higher rates of migration.

  These reports were quite late in the cycle so I/we would like to start
  with this tree as it contains much of the code we can agree on and has
  not changed significantly over the last 2-3 weeks."

* tag 'balancenuma-v11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mel/linux-balancenuma: (50 commits)
  mm/rmap, migration: Make rmap_walk_anon() and try_to_unmap_anon() more scalable
  mm/rmap: Convert the struct anon_vma::mutex to an rwsem
  mm: migrate: Account a transhuge page properly when rate limiting
  mm: numa: Account for failed allocations and isolations as migration failures
  mm: numa: Add THP migration for the NUMA working set scanning fault case build fix
  mm: numa: Add THP migration for the NUMA working set scanning fault case.
  mm: sched: numa: Delay PTE scanning until a task is scheduled on a new node
  mm: sched: numa: Control enabling and disabling of NUMA balancing if !SCHED_DEBUG
  mm: sched: numa: Control enabling and disabling of NUMA balancing
  mm: sched: Adapt the scanning rate if a NUMA hinting fault does not migrate
  mm: numa: Use a two-stage filter to restrict pages being migrated for unlikely task<->node relationships
  mm: numa: migrate: Set last_nid on newly allocated page
  mm: numa: split_huge_page: Transfer last_nid on tail page
  mm: numa: Introduce last_nid to the page frame
  sched: numa: Slowly increase the scanning period as NUMA faults are handled
  mm: numa: Rate limit setting of pte_numa if node is saturated
  mm: numa: Rate limit the amount of memory that is migrated between nodes
  mm: numa: Structures for Migrate On Fault per NUMA migration rate limiting
  mm: numa: Migrate pages handled during a pmd_numa hinting fault
  mm: numa: Migrate on reference policy
  ...

1 files changed, 195 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index db2e9e797a0..e6a3b933517 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
 #include <linux/swapops.h>
 #include <linux/elf.h>
 #include <linux/gfp.h>
+#include <linux/migrate.h>
 
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
@@ -1503,6 +1504,8 @@ struct page *follow_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 		page = follow_huge_pmd(mm, address, pmd, flags & FOLL_WRITE);
 		goto out;
 	}
+	if ((flags & FOLL_NUMA) && pmd_numa(*pmd))
+		goto no_page_table;
 	if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd)) {
 		if (flags & FOLL_SPLIT) {
 			split_huge_page_pmd(vma, address, pmd);
@@ -1532,6 +1535,8 @@ split_fallthrough:
 	pte = *ptep;
 	if (!pte_present(pte))
 		goto no_page;
+	if ((flags & FOLL_NUMA) && pte_numa(pte))
+		goto no_page;
 	if ((flags & FOLL_WRITE) && !pte_write(pte))
 		goto unlock;
 
@@ -1683,6 +1688,19 @@ int __get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
 			(VM_WRITE | VM_MAYWRITE) : (VM_READ | VM_MAYREAD);
 	vm_flags &= (gup_flags & FOLL_FORCE) ?
 			(VM_MAYREAD | VM_MAYWRITE) : (VM_READ | VM_WRITE);
+
+	/*
+	 * If FOLL_FORCE and FOLL_NUMA are both set, handle_mm_fault
+	 * would be called on PROT_NONE ranges. We must never invoke
+	 * handle_mm_fault on PROT_NONE ranges or the NUMA hinting
+	 * page faults would unprotect the PROT_NONE ranges if
+	 * _PAGE_NUMA and _PAGE_PROTNONE are sharing the same pte/pmd
+	 * bitflag. So to avoid that, don't set FOLL_NUMA if
+	 * FOLL_FORCE is set.
+	 */
+	if (!(gup_flags & FOLL_FORCE))
+		gup_flags |= FOLL_NUMA;
+
 	i = 0;
 
 	do {
@@ -3412,6 +3430,169 @@ static int do_nonlinear_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	return __do_fault(mm, vma, address, pmd, pgoff, flags, orig_pte);
 }
 
+int numa_migrate_prep(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+				unsigned long addr, int current_nid)
+{
+	get_page(page);
+
+	count_vm_numa_event(NUMA_HINT_FAULTS);
+	if (current_nid == numa_node_id())
+		count_vm_numa_event(NUMA_HINT_FAULTS_LOCAL);
+
+	return mpol_misplaced(page, vma, addr);
+}
+
+int do_numa_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+		   unsigned long addr, pte_t pte, pte_t *ptep, pmd_t *pmd)
+{
+	struct page *page = NULL;
+	spinlock_t *ptl;
+	int current_nid = -1;
+	int target_nid;
+	bool migrated = false;
+
+	/*
+	* The "pte" at this point cannot be used safely without
+	* validation through pte_unmap_same(). It's of NUMA type but
+	* the pfn may be screwed if the read is non atomic.
+	*
+	* ptep_modify_prot_start is not called as this is clearing
+	* the _PAGE_NUMA bit and it is not really expected that there
+	* would be concurrent hardware modifications to the PTE.
+	*/
+	ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd);
+	spin_lock(ptl);
+	if (unlikely(!pte_same(*ptep, pte))) {
+		pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	pte = pte_mknonnuma(pte);
+	set_pte_at(mm, addr, ptep, pte);
+	update_mmu_cache(vma, addr, ptep);
+
+	page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, pte);
+	if (!page) {
+		pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	current_nid = page_to_nid(page);
+	target_nid = numa_migrate_prep(page, vma, addr, current_nid);
+	pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
+	if (target_nid == -1) {
+		/*
+		 * Account for the fault against the current node if it not
+		 * being replaced regardless of where the page is located.
+		 */
+		current_nid = numa_node_id();
+		put_page(page);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* Migrate to the requested node */
+	migrated = migrate_misplaced_page(page, target_nid);
+	if (migrated)
+		current_nid = target_nid;
+
+out:
+	if (current_nid != -1)
+		task_numa_fault(current_nid, 1, migrated);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* NUMA hinting page fault entry point for regular pmds */
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
+static int do_pmd_numa_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+		     unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp)
+{
+	pmd_t pmd;
+	pte_t *pte, *orig_pte;
+	unsigned long _addr = addr & PMD_MASK;
+	unsigned long offset;
+	spinlock_t *ptl;
+	bool numa = false;
+	int local_nid = numa_node_id();
+
+	spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
+	pmd = *pmdp;
+	if (pmd_numa(pmd)) {
+		set_pmd_at(mm, _addr, pmdp, pmd_mknonnuma(pmd));
+		numa = true;
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
+
+	if (!numa)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* we're in a page fault so some vma must be in the range */
+	BUG_ON(!vma);
+	BUG_ON(vma->vm_start >= _addr + PMD_SIZE);
+	offset = max(_addr, vma->vm_start) & ~PMD_MASK;
+	VM_BUG_ON(offset >= PMD_SIZE);
+	orig_pte = pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmdp, _addr, &ptl);
+	pte += offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	for (addr = _addr + offset; addr < _addr + PMD_SIZE; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
+		pte_t pteval = *pte;
+		struct page *page;
+		int curr_nid = local_nid;
+		int target_nid;
+		bool migrated;
+		if (!pte_present(pteval))
+			continue;
+		if (!pte_numa(pteval))
+			continue;
+		if (addr >= vma->vm_end) {
+			vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
+			/* there's a pte present so there must be a vma */
+			BUG_ON(!vma);
+			BUG_ON(addr < vma->vm_start);
+		}
+		if (pte_numa(pteval)) {
+			pteval = pte_mknonnuma(pteval);
+			set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, pteval);
+		}
+		page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, pteval);
+		if (unlikely(!page))
+			continue;
+		/* only check non-shared pages */
+		if (unlikely(page_mapcount(page) != 1))
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Note that the NUMA fault is later accounted to either
+		 * the node that is currently running or where the page is
+		 * migrated to.
+		 */
+		curr_nid = local_nid;
+		target_nid = numa_migrate_prep(page, vma, addr,
+					       page_to_nid(page));
+		if (target_nid == -1) {
+			put_page(page);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/* Migrate to the requested node */
+		pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
+		migrated = migrate_misplaced_page(page, target_nid);
+		if (migrated)
+			curr_nid = target_nid;
+		task_numa_fault(curr_nid, 1, migrated);
+
+		pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmdp, addr, &ptl);
+	}
+	pte_unmap_unlock(orig_pte, ptl);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#else
+static int do_pmd_numa_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+		     unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp)
+{
+	BUG();
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
+
 /*
  * These routines also need to handle stuff like marking pages dirty
  * and/or accessed for architectures that don't do it in hardware (most
@@ -3450,6 +3631,9 @@ int handle_pte_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
 					pte, pmd, flags, entry);
 	}
 
+	if (pte_numa(entry))
+		return do_numa_page(mm, vma, address, entry, pte, pmd);
+
 	ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd);
 	spin_lock(ptl);
 	if (unlikely(!pte_same(*pte, entry)))
@@ -3520,8 +3704,11 @@ retry:
 		if (pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd)) {
 			unsigned int dirty = flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
 
-			if (dirty && !pmd_write(orig_pmd) &&
-			    !pmd_trans_splitting(orig_pmd)) {
+			if (pmd_numa(orig_pmd))
+				return do_huge_pmd_numa_page(mm, vma, address,
+							     orig_pmd, pmd);
+
+			if (dirty && !pmd_write(orig_pmd)) {
 				ret = do_huge_pmd_wp_page(mm, vma, address, pmd,
 							  orig_pmd);
 				/*
@@ -3536,16 +3723,21 @@ retry:
 				huge_pmd_set_accessed(mm, vma, address, pmd,
 						      orig_pmd, dirty);
 			}
+
 			return 0;
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (pmd_numa(*pmd))
+		return do_pmd_numa_page(mm, vma, address, pmd);
+
 	/*
 	 * Use __pte_alloc instead of pte_alloc_map, because we can't
 	 * run pte_offset_map on the pmd, if an huge pmd could
 	 * materialize from under us from a different thread.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(pmd_none(*pmd)) && __pte_alloc(mm, vma, pmd, address))
+	if (unlikely(pmd_none(*pmd)) &&
+	    unlikely(__pte_alloc(mm, vma, pmd, address)))
 		return VM_FAULT_OOM;
 	/* if an huge pmd materialized from under us just retry later */
 	if (unlikely(pmd_trans_huge(*pmd)))