aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/crc-t10dif.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2013-07-01 00:40:55 +0200
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2013-07-13 11:42:27 -0700
commitc02527487f0c8feb578c0394ad481a97f26d3bd2 (patch)
tree19d353337d741fa5baf11087717ffcddd830970a /lib/crc-t10dif.c
parent312cf3e4cf531e1f729624464bce7542025f7cbe (diff)
cpufreq: Fix cpufreq regression after suspend/resume
commit f51e1eb63d9c28cec188337ee656a13be6980cfd upstream. Toralf Förster reported that the cpufreq ondemand governor behaves erratically (doesn't scale well) after a suspend/resume cycle. The problem was that the cpufreq subsystem's idea of the cpu frequencies differed from the actual frequencies set in the hardware after a suspend/resume cycle. Toralf bisected the problem to commit a66b2e5 (cpufreq: Preserve sysfs files across suspend/resume). Among other (harmless) things, that commit skipped the call to cpufreq_update_policy() in the resume path. But cpufreq_update_policy() plays an important role during resume, because it is responsible for checking if the BIOS changed the cpu frequencies behind our back and resynchronize the cpufreq subsystem's knowledge of the cpu frequencies, and update them accordingly. So, restore the call to cpufreq_update_policy() in the resume path to fix the cpufreq regression. Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/crc-t10dif.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions