diff options
author | Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> | 2010-04-22 11:47:51 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> | 2010-05-26 14:27:07 -0700 |
commit | 843447c62b771a9ad12f0e7f4a791804b4cc99f5 (patch) | |
tree | 46dff7ba661b3cb7a9abee96d29b7d6d1feac23a /kernel | |
parent | 0851f4563b9e0770d4b3c071e605cb5e150c6ed3 (diff) |
clockevent: Prevent dead lock on clockevents_lock
This is a merge of two mainline commits, intended
for stable@kernel.org submission for 2.6.27 kernel.
commit f833bab87fca5c3ce13778421b1365845843b976
and
commit 918aae42aa9b611a3663b16ae849fdedc67c2292
Changelog of both:
Currently clockevents_notify() is called with interrupts enabled at
some places and interrupts disabled at some other places.
This results in a deadlock in this scenario.
cpu A holds clockevents_lock in clockevents_notify() with irqs enabled
cpu B waits for clockevents_lock in clockevents_notify() with irqs disabled
cpu C doing set_mtrr() which will try to rendezvous of all the cpus.
This will result in C and A come to the rendezvous point and waiting
for B. B is stuck forever waiting for the spinlock and thus not
reaching the rendezvous point.
Fix the clockevents code so that clockevents_lock is taken with
interrupts disabled and thus avoid the above deadlock.
Also call lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast() on the destination cpu so
that we avoid calling smp_call_function() in the clockevents notifier
chain.
This issue left us wondering if we need to change the MTRR rendezvous
logic to use stop machine logic (instead of smp_call_function) or add
a check in spinlock debug code to see if there are other spinlocks
which gets taken under both interrupts enabled/disabled conditions.
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: "Brown Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
LKML-Reference: <1250544899.2709.210.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
I got following warning on ia64 box:
In function 'acpi_processor_power_verify':
642: warning: passing argument 2 of 'smp_call_function_single' from
incompatible pointer type
This smp_call_function_single() was introduced by a commit
f833bab87fca5c3ce13778421b1365845843b976:
The problem is that the lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast() has 2 versions:
One is real code that modified in the above commit, and the other is NOP
code that used when !ARCH_APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3:
static void lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast(struct acpi_processor *pr) { }
So I got warning because of !ARCH_APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3.
We really want to do nothing here on !ARCH_APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3, so
modify lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast() of real version to use
smp_call_function_single() in it.
Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/time/clockevents.c | 16 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 7 |
2 files changed, 13 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/time/clockevents.c b/kernel/time/clockevents.c index f8d968063ce..ae51d5e22c2 100644 --- a/kernel/time/clockevents.c +++ b/kernel/time/clockevents.c @@ -124,11 +124,12 @@ int clockevents_program_event(struct clock_event_device *dev, ktime_t expires, */ int clockevents_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb) { + unsigned long flags; int ret; - spin_lock(&clockevents_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&clockevents_lock, flags); ret = raw_notifier_chain_register(&clockevents_chain, nb); - spin_unlock(&clockevents_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clockevents_lock, flags); return ret; } @@ -165,6 +166,8 @@ static void clockevents_notify_released(void) */ void clockevents_register_device(struct clock_event_device *dev) { + unsigned long flags; + BUG_ON(dev->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED); /* * A nsec2cyc multiplicator of 0 is invalid and we'd crash @@ -175,13 +178,13 @@ void clockevents_register_device(struct clock_event_device *dev) WARN_ON(1); } - spin_lock(&clockevents_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&clockevents_lock, flags); list_add(&dev->list, &clockevent_devices); clockevents_do_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_ADD, dev); clockevents_notify_released(); - spin_unlock(&clockevents_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clockevents_lock, flags); } /* @@ -228,8 +231,9 @@ void clockevents_exchange_device(struct clock_event_device *old, void clockevents_notify(unsigned long reason, void *arg) { struct list_head *node, *tmp; + unsigned long flags; - spin_lock(&clockevents_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&clockevents_lock, flags); clockevents_do_notify(reason, arg); switch (reason) { @@ -244,7 +248,7 @@ void clockevents_notify(unsigned long reason, void *arg) default: break; } - spin_unlock(&clockevents_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clockevents_lock, flags); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clockevents_notify); #endif diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c index cb01cd8f919..d1b32166be6 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c @@ -205,11 +205,11 @@ static void tick_handle_periodic_broadcast(struct clock_event_device *dev) * Powerstate information: The system enters/leaves a state, where * affected devices might stop */ -static void tick_do_broadcast_on_off(void *why) +static void tick_do_broadcast_on_off(unsigned long *reason) { struct clock_event_device *bc, *dev; struct tick_device *td; - unsigned long flags, *reason = why; + unsigned long flags; int cpu, bc_stopped; spin_lock_irqsave(&tick_broadcast_lock, flags); @@ -276,8 +276,7 @@ void tick_broadcast_on_off(unsigned long reason, int *oncpu) printk(KERN_ERR "tick-broadcast: ignoring broadcast for " "offline CPU #%d\n", *oncpu); else - smp_call_function_single(*oncpu, tick_do_broadcast_on_off, - &reason, 1); + tick_do_broadcast_on_off(&reason); } /* |