diff options
author | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2012-05-14 08:41:20 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2012-05-14 08:41:46 +0200 |
commit | 2d84e023cb5ec00403ff5d447533c6fd58fcc7ff (patch) | |
tree | cb10d9a568ebb4be8593821a6f205efedf2f4ddd /kernel/rcutree.c | |
parent | 9ff00d58a915b6747ba2e843ab2d04c712b4dc32 (diff) | |
parent | dc36be4419311fd57becdf54bfeef6bd04a6741d (diff) |
Merge branch 'rcu/next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu into core/rcu
Pull the v3.5 RCU tree from Paul E. McKenney:
1) A set of improvements and fixes to the RCU_FAST_NO_HZ feature
(with more on the way for 3.6). Posted to LKML:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/23/324 (commits 1-3 and 5),
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/16/611 (commit 4),
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/30/390 (commit 6), and
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/4/410 (commit 7, combined with
the other commits for the convenience of the tester).
2) Changes to make rcu_barrier() avoid disrupting execution of CPUs
that have no RCU callbacks. Posted to LKML:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/23/322.
3) A couple of commits that improve the efficiency of the interaction
between preemptible RCU and the scheduler, these two being all
that survived an abortive attempt to allow preemptible RCU's
__rcu_read_lock() to be inlined. The full set was posted to
LKML at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/14/143, and the first and
third patches of that set remain.
4) Lai Jiangshan's algorithmic implementation of SRCU, which includes
call_srcu() and srcu_barrier(). A major feature of this new
implementation is that synchronize_srcu() no longer disturbs
the execution of other CPUs. This work is based on earlier
implementations by Peter Zijlstra and Paul E. McKenney. Posted to
LKML: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/22/82.
5) A number of miscellaneous bug fixes and improvements which were
posted to LKML at: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/23/353 with
subsequent updates posted to LKML.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/rcutree.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/rcutree.c | 332 |
1 files changed, 244 insertions, 88 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c index d0c5baf1ab1..0da7b88d92d 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree.c +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ static struct lock_class_key rcu_node_class[NUM_RCU_LVLS]; .gpnum = -300, \ .completed = -300, \ .onofflock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&structname##_state.onofflock), \ + .orphan_nxttail = &structname##_state.orphan_nxtlist, \ + .orphan_donetail = &structname##_state.orphan_donelist, \ .fqslock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&structname##_state.fqslock), \ .n_force_qs = 0, \ .n_force_qs_ngp = 0, \ @@ -145,6 +147,13 @@ static void invoke_rcu_callbacks(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp); unsigned long rcutorture_testseq; unsigned long rcutorture_vernum; +/* State information for rcu_barrier() and friends. */ + +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_head, rcu_barrier_head) = {NULL}; +static atomic_t rcu_barrier_cpu_count; +static DEFINE_MUTEX(rcu_barrier_mutex); +static struct completion rcu_barrier_completion; + /* * Return true if an RCU grace period is in progress. The ACCESS_ONCE()s * permit this function to be invoked without holding the root rcu_node @@ -192,7 +201,6 @@ void rcu_note_context_switch(int cpu) { trace_rcu_utilization("Start context switch"); rcu_sched_qs(cpu); - rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(cpu); trace_rcu_utilization("End context switch"); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_note_context_switch); @@ -1311,95 +1319,133 @@ rcu_check_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp) #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU /* - * Move a dying CPU's RCU callbacks to online CPU's callback list. - * Also record a quiescent state for this CPU for the current grace period. - * Synchronization and interrupt disabling are not required because - * this function executes in stop_machine() context. Therefore, cleanup - * operations that might block must be done later from the CPU_DEAD - * notifier. - * - * Note that the outgoing CPU's bit has already been cleared in the - * cpu_online_mask. This allows us to randomly pick a callback - * destination from the bits set in that mask. + * Send the specified CPU's RCU callbacks to the orphanage. The + * specified CPU must be offline, and the caller must hold the + * ->onofflock. */ -static void rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp) +static void +rcu_send_cbs_to_orphanage(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, + struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp) { int i; - unsigned long mask; - int receive_cpu = cpumask_any(cpu_online_mask); - struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda); - struct rcu_data *receive_rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, receive_cpu); - RCU_TRACE(struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode); /* For dying CPU. */ - /* First, adjust the counts. */ + /* + * Orphan the callbacks. First adjust the counts. This is safe + * because ->onofflock excludes _rcu_barrier()'s adoption of + * the callbacks, thus no memory barrier is required. + */ if (rdp->nxtlist != NULL) { - receive_rdp->qlen_lazy += rdp->qlen_lazy; - receive_rdp->qlen += rdp->qlen; + rsp->qlen_lazy += rdp->qlen_lazy; + rsp->qlen += rdp->qlen; + rdp->n_cbs_orphaned += rdp->qlen; rdp->qlen_lazy = 0; rdp->qlen = 0; } /* - * Next, move ready-to-invoke callbacks to be invoked on some - * other CPU. These will not be required to pass through another - * grace period: They are done, regardless of CPU. + * Next, move those callbacks still needing a grace period to + * the orphanage, where some other CPU will pick them up. + * Some of the callbacks might have gone partway through a grace + * period, but that is too bad. They get to start over because we + * cannot assume that grace periods are synchronized across CPUs. + * We don't bother updating the ->nxttail[] array yet, instead + * we just reset the whole thing later on. */ - if (rdp->nxtlist != NULL && - rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL] != &rdp->nxtlist) { - struct rcu_head *oldhead; - struct rcu_head **oldtail; - struct rcu_head **newtail; - - oldhead = rdp->nxtlist; - oldtail = receive_rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL]; - rdp->nxtlist = *rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL]; - *rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL] = *oldtail; - *receive_rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL] = oldhead; - newtail = rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL]; - for (i = RCU_DONE_TAIL; i < RCU_NEXT_SIZE; i++) { - if (receive_rdp->nxttail[i] == oldtail) - receive_rdp->nxttail[i] = newtail; - if (rdp->nxttail[i] == newtail) - rdp->nxttail[i] = &rdp->nxtlist; - } + if (*rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL] != NULL) { + *rsp->orphan_nxttail = *rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL]; + rsp->orphan_nxttail = rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL]; + *rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL] = NULL; } /* - * Finally, put the rest of the callbacks at the end of the list. - * The ones that made it partway through get to start over: We - * cannot assume that grace periods are synchronized across CPUs. - * (We could splice RCU_WAIT_TAIL into RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL, but - * this does not seem compelling. Not yet, anyway.) + * Then move the ready-to-invoke callbacks to the orphanage, + * where some other CPU will pick them up. These will not be + * required to pass though another grace period: They are done. */ if (rdp->nxtlist != NULL) { - *receive_rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = rdp->nxtlist; - receive_rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = - rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL]; - receive_rdp->n_cbs_adopted += rdp->qlen; - rdp->n_cbs_orphaned += rdp->qlen; - - rdp->nxtlist = NULL; - for (i = 0; i < RCU_NEXT_SIZE; i++) - rdp->nxttail[i] = &rdp->nxtlist; + *rsp->orphan_donetail = rdp->nxtlist; + rsp->orphan_donetail = rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL]; } + /* Finally, initialize the rcu_data structure's list to empty. */ + rdp->nxtlist = NULL; + for (i = 0; i < RCU_NEXT_SIZE; i++) + rdp->nxttail[i] = &rdp->nxtlist; +} + +/* + * Adopt the RCU callbacks from the specified rcu_state structure's + * orphanage. The caller must hold the ->onofflock. + */ +static void rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp) +{ + int i; + struct rcu_data *rdp = __this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda); + /* - * Record a quiescent state for the dying CPU. This is safe - * only because we have already cleared out the callbacks. - * (Otherwise, the RCU core might try to schedule the invocation - * of callbacks on this now-offline CPU, which would be bad.) + * If there is an rcu_barrier() operation in progress, then + * only the task doing that operation is permitted to adopt + * callbacks. To do otherwise breaks rcu_barrier() and friends + * by causing them to fail to wait for the callbacks in the + * orphanage. */ - mask = rdp->grpmask; /* rnp->grplo is constant. */ + if (rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress && + rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress != current) + return; + + /* Do the accounting first. */ + rdp->qlen_lazy += rsp->qlen_lazy; + rdp->qlen += rsp->qlen; + rdp->n_cbs_adopted += rsp->qlen; + rsp->qlen_lazy = 0; + rsp->qlen = 0; + + /* + * We do not need a memory barrier here because the only way we + * can get here if there is an rcu_barrier() in flight is if + * we are the task doing the rcu_barrier(). + */ + + /* First adopt the ready-to-invoke callbacks. */ + if (rsp->orphan_donelist != NULL) { + *rsp->orphan_donetail = *rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL]; + *rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL] = rsp->orphan_donelist; + for (i = RCU_NEXT_SIZE - 1; i >= RCU_DONE_TAIL; i--) + if (rdp->nxttail[i] == rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL]) + rdp->nxttail[i] = rsp->orphan_donetail; + rsp->orphan_donelist = NULL; + rsp->orphan_donetail = &rsp->orphan_donelist; + } + + /* And then adopt the callbacks that still need a grace period. */ + if (rsp->orphan_nxtlist != NULL) { + *rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = rsp->orphan_nxtlist; + rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = rsp->orphan_nxttail; + rsp->orphan_nxtlist = NULL; + rsp->orphan_nxttail = &rsp->orphan_nxtlist; + } +} + +/* + * Trace the fact that this CPU is going offline. + */ +static void rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp) +{ + RCU_TRACE(unsigned long mask); + RCU_TRACE(struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda)); + RCU_TRACE(struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode); + + RCU_TRACE(mask = rdp->grpmask); trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rnp->gpnum + 1 - !!(rnp->qsmask & mask), "cpuofl"); - rcu_report_qs_rdp(smp_processor_id(), rsp, rdp, rsp->gpnum); - /* Note that rcu_report_qs_rdp() might call trace_rcu_grace_period(). */ } /* * The CPU has been completely removed, and some other CPU is reporting - * this fact from process context. Do the remainder of the cleanup. + * this fact from process context. Do the remainder of the cleanup, + * including orphaning the outgoing CPU's RCU callbacks, and also + * adopting them, if there is no _rcu_barrier() instance running. * There can only be one CPU hotplug operation at a time, so no other * CPU can be attempting to update rcu_cpu_kthread_task. */ @@ -1409,17 +1455,21 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp) unsigned long mask; int need_report = 0; struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu); - struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode; /* Outgoing CPU's rnp. */ + struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode; /* Outgoing CPU's rdp & rnp. */ /* Adjust any no-longer-needed kthreads. */ rcu_stop_cpu_kthread(cpu); rcu_node_kthread_setaffinity(rnp, -1); - /* Remove the dying CPU from the bitmasks in the rcu_node hierarchy. */ + /* Remove the dead CPU from the bitmasks in the rcu_node hierarchy. */ /* Exclude any attempts to start a new grace period. */ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rsp->onofflock, flags); + /* Orphan the dead CPU's callbacks, and adopt them if appropriate. */ + rcu_send_cbs_to_orphanage(cpu, rsp, rnp, rdp); + rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(rsp); + /* Remove the outgoing CPU from the masks in the rcu_node hierarchy. */ mask = rdp->grpmask; /* rnp->grplo is constant. */ do { @@ -1456,6 +1506,10 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp) #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */ +static void rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp) +{ +} + static void rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp) { } @@ -1524,9 +1578,6 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp) rcu_is_callbacks_kthread()); /* Update count, and requeue any remaining callbacks. */ - rdp->qlen_lazy -= count_lazy; - rdp->qlen -= count; - rdp->n_cbs_invoked += count; if (list != NULL) { *tail = rdp->nxtlist; rdp->nxtlist = list; @@ -1536,6 +1587,10 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp) else break; } + smp_mb(); /* List handling before counting for rcu_barrier(). */ + rdp->qlen_lazy -= count_lazy; + rdp->qlen -= count; + rdp->n_cbs_invoked += count; /* Reinstate batch limit if we have worked down the excess. */ if (rdp->blimit == LONG_MAX && rdp->qlen <= qlowmark) @@ -1823,11 +1878,14 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu), rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda); /* Add the callback to our list. */ - *rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = head; - rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = &head->next; rdp->qlen++; if (lazy) rdp->qlen_lazy++; + else + rcu_idle_count_callbacks_posted(); + smp_mb(); /* Count before adding callback for rcu_barrier(). */ + *rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = head; + rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = &head->next; if (__is_kfree_rcu_offset((unsigned long)func)) trace_rcu_kfree_callback(rsp->name, head, (unsigned long)func, @@ -1893,6 +1951,38 @@ void call_rcu_bh(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu)) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_bh); +/* + * Because a context switch is a grace period for RCU-sched and RCU-bh, + * any blocking grace-period wait automatically implies a grace period + * if there is only one CPU online at any point time during execution + * of either synchronize_sched() or synchronize_rcu_bh(). It is OK to + * occasionally incorrectly indicate that there are multiple CPUs online + * when there was in fact only one the whole time, as this just adds + * some overhead: RCU still operates correctly. + * + * Of course, sampling num_online_cpus() with preemption enabled can + * give erroneous results if there are concurrent CPU-hotplug operations. + * For example, given a demonic sequence of preemptions in num_online_cpus() + * and CPU-hotplug operations, there could be two or more CPUs online at + * all times, but num_online_cpus() might well return one (or even zero). + * + * However, all such demonic sequences require at least one CPU-offline + * operation. Furthermore, rcu_blocking_is_gp() giving the wrong answer + * is only a problem if there is an RCU read-side critical section executing + * throughout. But RCU-sched and RCU-bh read-side critical sections + * disable either preemption or bh, which prevents a CPU from going offline. + * Therefore, the only way that rcu_blocking_is_gp() can incorrectly return + * that there is only one CPU when in fact there was more than one throughout + * is when there were no RCU readers in the system. If there are no + * RCU readers, the grace period by definition can be of zero length, + * regardless of the number of online CPUs. + */ +static inline int rcu_blocking_is_gp(void) +{ + might_sleep(); /* Check for RCU read-side critical section. */ + return num_online_cpus() <= 1; +} + /** * synchronize_sched - wait until an rcu-sched grace period has elapsed. * @@ -2166,11 +2256,10 @@ static int rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(int cpu) rcu_preempt_cpu_has_callbacks(cpu); } -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_head, rcu_barrier_head) = {NULL}; -static atomic_t rcu_barrier_cpu_count; -static DEFINE_MUTEX(rcu_barrier_mutex); -static struct completion rcu_barrier_completion; - +/* + * RCU callback function for _rcu_barrier(). If we are last, wake + * up the task executing _rcu_barrier(). + */ static void rcu_barrier_callback(struct rcu_head *notused) { if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count)) @@ -2200,27 +2289,94 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp, void (*call_rcu_func)(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head))) { - BUG_ON(in_interrupt()); + int cpu; + unsigned long flags; + struct rcu_data *rdp; + struct rcu_head rh; + + init_rcu_head_on_stack(&rh); + /* Take mutex to serialize concurrent rcu_barrier() requests. */ mutex_lock(&rcu_barrier_mutex); - init_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion); + + smp_mb(); /* Prevent any prior operations from leaking in. */ + /* - * Initialize rcu_barrier_cpu_count to 1, then invoke - * rcu_barrier_func() on each CPU, so that each CPU also has - * incremented rcu_barrier_cpu_count. Only then is it safe to - * decrement rcu_barrier_cpu_count -- otherwise the first CPU - * might complete its grace period before all of the other CPUs - * did their increment, causing this function to return too - * early. Note that on_each_cpu() disables irqs, which prevents - * any CPUs from coming online or going offline until each online - * CPU has queued its RCU-barrier callback. + * Initialize the count to one rather than to zero in order to + * avoid a too-soon return to zero in case of a short grace period + * (or preemption of this task). Also flag this task as doing + * an rcu_barrier(). This will prevent anyone else from adopting + * orphaned callbacks, which could cause otherwise failure if a + * CPU went offline and quickly came back online. To see this, + * consider the following sequence of events: + * + * 1. We cause CPU 0 to post an rcu_barrier_callback() callback. + * 2. CPU 1 goes offline, orphaning its callbacks. + * 3. CPU 0 adopts CPU 1's orphaned callbacks. + * 4. CPU 1 comes back online. + * 5. We cause CPU 1 to post an rcu_barrier_callback() callback. + * 6. Both rcu_barrier_callback() callbacks are invoked, awakening + * us -- but before CPU 1's orphaned callbacks are invoked!!! */ + init_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion); atomic_set(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count, 1); - on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)call_rcu_func, 1); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rsp->onofflock, flags); + rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress = current; + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->onofflock, flags); + + /* + * Force every CPU with callbacks to register a new callback + * that will tell us when all the preceding callbacks have + * been invoked. If an offline CPU has callbacks, wait for + * it to either come back online or to finish orphaning those + * callbacks. + */ + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + preempt_disable(); + rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu); + if (cpu_is_offline(cpu)) { + preempt_enable(); + while (cpu_is_offline(cpu) && ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen)) + schedule_timeout_interruptible(1); + } else if (ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen)) { + smp_call_function_single(cpu, rcu_barrier_func, + (void *)call_rcu_func, 1); + preempt_enable(); + } else { + preempt_enable(); + } + } + + /* + * Now that all online CPUs have rcu_barrier_callback() callbacks + * posted, we can adopt all of the orphaned callbacks and place + * an rcu_barrier_callback() callback after them. When that is done, + * we are guaranteed to have an rcu_barrier_callback() callback + * following every callback that could possibly have been + * registered before _rcu_barrier() was called. + */ + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rsp->onofflock, flags); + rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(rsp); + rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress = NULL; + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->onofflock, flags); + atomic_inc(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count); + smp_mb__after_atomic_inc(); /* Ensure atomic_inc() before callback. */ + call_rcu_func(&rh, rcu_barrier_callback); + + /* + * Now that we have an rcu_barrier_callback() callback on each + * CPU, and thus each counted, remove the initial count. + */ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count)) complete(&rcu_barrier_completion); + + /* Wait for all rcu_barrier_callback() callbacks to be invoked. */ wait_for_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion); + + /* Other rcu_barrier() invocations can now safely proceed. */ mutex_unlock(&rcu_barrier_mutex); + + destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rh); } /** @@ -2417,7 +2573,7 @@ static void __init rcu_init_levelspread(struct rcu_state *rsp) for (i = NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1; i > 0; i--) rsp->levelspread[i] = CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT; - rsp->levelspread[0] = RCU_FANOUT_LEAF; + rsp->levelspread[0] = CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF; } #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT */ static void __init rcu_init_levelspread(struct rcu_state *rsp) |