diff options
author | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> | 2012-02-24 20:07:11 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2012-02-29 16:31:23 -0800 |
commit | 7741374fa2e5b7fa48f674bdbac6e1d5edf55c5a (patch) | |
tree | acdaa6011b09339e65098fcb2766b8026e3c769b /fs | |
parent | a93a91746fe70854f5301c526d1eec16312bebc3 (diff) |
epoll: introduce POLLFREE to flush ->signalfd_wqh before kfree()
commit d80e731ecab420ddcb79ee9d0ac427acbc187b4b upstream.
This patch is intentionally incomplete to simplify the review.
It ignores ep_unregister_pollwait() which plays with the same wqh.
See the next change.
epoll assumes that the EPOLL_CTL_ADD'ed file controls everything
f_op->poll() needs. In particular it assumes that the wait queue
can't go away until eventpoll_release(). This is not true in case
of signalfd, the task which does EPOLL_CTL_ADD uses its ->sighand
which is not connected to the file.
This patch adds the special event, POLLFREE, currently only for
epoll. It expects that init_poll_funcptr()'ed hook should do the
necessary cleanup. Perhaps it should be defined as EPOLLFREE in
eventpoll.
__cleanup_sighand() is changed to do wake_up_poll(POLLFREE) if
->signalfd_wqh is not empty, we add the new signalfd_cleanup()
helper.
ep_poll_callback(POLLFREE) simply does list_del_init(task_list).
This make this poll entry inconsistent, but we don't care. If you
share epoll fd which contains our sigfd with another process you
should blame yourself. signalfd is "really special". I simply do
not know how we can define the "right" semantics if it used with
epoll.
The main problem is, epoll calls signalfd_poll() once to establish
the connection with the wait queue, after that signalfd_poll(NULL)
returns the different/inconsistent results depending on who does
EPOLL_CTL_MOD/signalfd_read/etc. IOW: apart from sigmask, signalfd
has nothing to do with the file, it works with the current thread.
In short: this patch is the hack which tries to fix the symptoms.
It also assumes that nobody can take tasklist_lock under epoll
locks, this seems to be true.
Note:
- we do not have wake_up_all_poll() but wake_up_poll()
is fine, poll/epoll doesn't use WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE.
- signalfd_cleanup() uses POLLHUP along with POLLFREE,
we need a couple of simple changes in eventpoll.c to
make sure it can't be "lost".
Reported-by: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/eventpoll.c | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | fs/signalfd.c | 11 |
2 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c index 828e750af23..ede66ad0fea 100644 --- a/fs/eventpoll.c +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c @@ -827,6 +827,10 @@ static int ep_poll_callback(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *k struct epitem *epi = ep_item_from_wait(wait); struct eventpoll *ep = epi->ep; + /* the caller holds eppoll_entry->whead->lock */ + if ((unsigned long)key & POLLFREE) + list_del_init(&wait->task_list); + spin_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags); /* diff --git a/fs/signalfd.c b/fs/signalfd.c index 492465b451d..79c1eea98a3 100644 --- a/fs/signalfd.c +++ b/fs/signalfd.c @@ -30,6 +30,17 @@ #include <linux/signalfd.h> #include <linux/syscalls.h> +void signalfd_cleanup(struct sighand_struct *sighand) +{ + wait_queue_head_t *wqh = &sighand->signalfd_wqh; + + if (likely(!waitqueue_active(wqh))) + return; + + /* wait_queue_t->func(POLLFREE) should do remove_wait_queue() */ + wake_up_poll(wqh, POLLHUP | POLLFREE); +} + struct signalfd_ctx { sigset_t sigmask; }; |