Btrfs: handle a bogus chunk tree nicely

If you restore a btrfs-image file system and try to mount that file system we'll
panic.  That's because btrfs-image restores and just makes one big chunk to
envelope the whole disk, since they are really only meant to be messed with by
our btrfs-progs.  So fix up btrfs_rmap_block and the callers of it for mount so
that we no longer panic but instead just return an error and fail to mount.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

2 files changed, 42 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 350b9b18140..a8ff25aedca 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -257,7 +257,8 @@ static int exclude_super_stripes(struct btrfs_root *root,
 		cache->bytes_super += stripe_len;
 		ret = add_excluded_extent(root, cache->key.objectid,
 					  stripe_len);
-		BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM */
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX; i++) {
@@ -265,13 +266,17 @@ static int exclude_super_stripes(struct btrfs_root *root,
 		ret = btrfs_rmap_block(&root->fs_info->mapping_tree,
 				       cache->key.objectid, bytenr,
 				       0, &logical, &nr, &stripe_len);
-		BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM */
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 
 		while (nr--) {
 			cache->bytes_super += stripe_len;
 			ret = add_excluded_extent(root, logical[nr],
 						  stripe_len);
-			BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM */
+			if (ret) {
+				kfree(logical);
+				return ret;
+			}
 		}
 
 		kfree(logical);
@@ -7964,7 +7969,17 @@ int btrfs_read_block_groups(struct btrfs_root *root)
 		 * info has super bytes accounted for, otherwise we'll think
 		 * we have more space than we actually do.
 		 */
-		exclude_super_stripes(root, cache);
+		ret = exclude_super_stripes(root, cache);
+		if (ret) {
+			/*
+			 * We may have excluded something, so call this just in
+			 * case.
+			 */
+			free_excluded_extents(root, cache);
+			kfree(cache->free_space_ctl);
+			kfree(cache);
+			goto error;
+		}
 
 		/*
 		 * check for two cases, either we are full, and therefore
@@ -8106,7 +8121,17 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 
 	cache->last_byte_to_unpin = (u64)-1;
 	cache->cached = BTRFS_CACHE_FINISHED;
-	exclude_super_stripes(root, cache);
+	ret = exclude_super_stripes(root, cache);
+	if (ret) {
+		/*
+		 * We may have excluded something, so call this just in
+		 * case.
+		 */
+		free_excluded_extents(root, cache);
+		kfree(cache->free_space_ctl);
+		kfree(cache);
+		return ret;
+	}
 
 	add_new_free_space(cache, root->fs_info, chunk_offset,
 			   chunk_offset + size);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 5989a92236f..2854c824ab6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -4935,7 +4935,18 @@ int btrfs_rmap_block(struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree,
 	em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, chunk_start, 1);
 	read_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
 
-	BUG_ON(!em || em->start != chunk_start);
+	if (!em) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs: couldn't find em for chunk %Lu\n",
+		       chunk_start);
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+
+	if (em->start != chunk_start) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs: bad chunk start, em=%Lu, wanted=%Lu\n",
+		       em->start, chunk_start);
+		free_extent_map(em);
+		return -EIO;
+	}
 	map = (struct map_lookup *)em->bdev;
 
 	length = em->len;