diff options
| author | Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> | 2012-10-10 11:51:09 +0530 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2012-10-28 10:14:12 -0700 |
| commit | d39bd2701f0f414aba1376ae61202b526ec7e128 (patch) | |
| tree | 6d47662cb049804b9dc88064caaea4f0e4ca8fc2 /fs | |
| parent | 2807664df50419f56b596aa49da8a22102c0e0a3 (diff) | |
nohz: Fix idle ticks in cpu summary line of /proc/stat
commit 7386cdbf2f57ea8cff3c9fde93f206e58b9fe13f upstream.
Git commit 09a1d34f8535ecf9 "nohz: Make idle/iowait counter update
conditional" introduced a bug in regard to cpu hotplug. The effect is
that the number of idle ticks in the cpu summary line in /proc/stat is
still counting ticks for offline cpus.
Reproduction is easy, just start a workload that keeps all cpus busy,
switch off one or more cpus and then watch the idle field in top.
On a dual-core with one cpu 100% busy and one offline cpu you will get
something like this:
%Cpu(s): 48.7 us, 1.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 50.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si,
%0.0 st
The problem is that an offline cpu still has ts->idle_active == 1.
To fix this we should make sure that the cpu is online when calling
get_cpu_idle_time_us and get_cpu_iowait_time_us.
[Srivatsa: Rebased to current mainline]
Reported-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20121010061820.8999.57245.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com
Cc: deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/proc/stat.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/fs/proc/stat.c b/fs/proc/stat.c index 64c3b317236..e296572c73e 100644 --- a/fs/proc/stat.c +++ b/fs/proc/stat.c @@ -45,10 +45,13 @@ static cputime64_t get_iowait_time(int cpu) static u64 get_idle_time(int cpu) { - u64 idle, idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL); + u64 idle, idle_time = -1ULL; + + if (cpu_online(cpu)) + idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL); if (idle_time == -1ULL) - /* !NO_HZ so we can rely on cpustat.idle */ + /* !NO_HZ or cpu offline so we can rely on cpustat.idle */ idle = kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[CPUTIME_IDLE]; else idle = usecs_to_cputime64(idle_time); @@ -58,10 +61,13 @@ static u64 get_idle_time(int cpu) static u64 get_iowait_time(int cpu) { - u64 iowait, iowait_time = get_cpu_iowait_time_us(cpu, NULL); + u64 iowait, iowait_time = -1ULL; + + if (cpu_online(cpu)) + iowait_time = get_cpu_iowait_time_us(cpu, NULL); if (iowait_time == -1ULL) - /* !NO_HZ so we can rely on cpustat.iowait */ + /* !NO_HZ or cpu offline so we can rely on cpustat.iowait */ iowait = kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[CPUTIME_IOWAIT]; else iowait = usecs_to_cputime64(iowait_time); |