diff options
| author | Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> | 2008-10-05 13:31:21 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> | 2008-10-07 17:41:33 -0400 |
| commit | 076f1fc94c44be2664172c63b4a2b51ae2d265ea (patch) | |
| tree | a2b0c6b28deb0d283ff754df90801cc1483ec41d /fs | |
| parent | 4dc05efb86239321d43a9d74fd2ecd5c21bfc2ad (diff) | |
NFS: Don't clear nfsi->cache_validity in nfs_check_inode_attributes()
If we're merely checking the inode attributes because we suspect that the
'updated' attributes returned by the RPC call are stale, then we shouldn't
be doing weak cache consistency updates or clearing the cache_validity
flags.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/nfs/inode.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c index 697157c1fdd..a2f54154d82 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c @@ -905,9 +905,6 @@ static int nfs_check_inode_attributes(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fat return -EIO; } - /* Do atomic weak cache consistency updates */ - nfs_wcc_update_inode(inode, fattr); - if ((fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_V4) != 0 && nfsi->change_attr != fattr->change_attr) invalid |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR|NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE; @@ -936,10 +933,6 @@ static int nfs_check_inode_attributes(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fat if (invalid != 0) nfsi->cache_validity |= invalid; - else - nfsi->cache_validity &= ~(NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR - | NFS_INO_INVALID_ATIME - | NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE); nfsi->read_cache_jiffies = fattr->time_start; return 0; |