xfs: fix failed write truncation handling.

Since the move to the new truncate sequence we call xfs_setattr to
truncate down excessively instanciated blocks.  As shown by the testcase
in kernel.org BZ #22452 that doesn't work too well.  Due to the confusion
of the internal inode size, and the VFS inode i_size it zeroes data that
it shouldn't.

But full blown truncate seems like overkill here.  We only instanciate
delayed allocations in the write path, and given that we never released
the iolock we can't have converted them to real allocations yet either.

The only nasty case is pre-existing preallocation which we need to skip.
We already do this for page discard during writeback, so make the delayed
allocation block punching a generic function and call it from the failed
write path as well as xfs_aops_discard_page. The callers are
responsible for ensuring that partial blocks are not truncated away,
and that they hold the ilock.

Based on a fix originally from Christoph Hellwig. This version used
filesystem blocks as the range unit.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

1 files changed, 76 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c
index 8abd12e32e1..08b179fa9e8 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c
@@ -6070,3 +6070,79 @@ xfs_bmap_disk_count_leaves(
 		*count += xfs_bmbt_disk_get_blockcount(frp);
 	}
 }
+
+/*
+ * dead simple method of punching delalyed allocation blocks from a range in
+ * the inode. Walks a block at a time so will be slow, but is only executed in
+ * rare error cases so the overhead is not critical. This will alays punch out
+ * both the start and end blocks, even if the ranges only partially overlap
+ * them, so it is up to the caller to ensure that partial blocks are not
+ * passed in.
+ */
+int
+xfs_bmap_punch_delalloc_range(
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
+	xfs_fileoff_t		start_fsb,
+	xfs_fileoff_t		length)
+{
+	xfs_fileoff_t		remaining = length;
+	int			error = 0;
+
+	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
+
+	do {
+		int		done;
+		xfs_bmbt_irec_t	imap;
+		int		nimaps = 1;
+		xfs_fsblock_t	firstblock;
+		xfs_bmap_free_t flist;
+
+		/*
+		 * Map the range first and check that it is a delalloc extent
+		 * before trying to unmap the range. Otherwise we will be
+		 * trying to remove a real extent (which requires a
+		 * transaction) or a hole, which is probably a bad idea...
+		 */
+		error = xfs_bmapi(NULL, ip, start_fsb, 1,
+				XFS_BMAPI_ENTIRE,  NULL, 0, &imap,
+				&nimaps, NULL);
+
+		if (error) {
+			/* something screwed, just bail */
+			if (!XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount)) {
+				xfs_fs_cmn_err(CE_ALERT, ip->i_mount,
+			"Failed delalloc mapping lookup ino %lld fsb %lld.",
+						ip->i_ino, start_fsb);
+			}
+			break;
+		}
+		if (!nimaps) {
+			/* nothing there */
+			goto next_block;
+		}
+		if (imap.br_startblock != DELAYSTARTBLOCK) {
+			/* been converted, ignore */
+			goto next_block;
+		}
+		WARN_ON(imap.br_blockcount == 0);
+
+		/*
+		 * Note: while we initialise the firstblock/flist pair, they
+		 * should never be used because blocks should never be
+		 * allocated or freed for a delalloc extent and hence we need
+		 * don't cancel or finish them after the xfs_bunmapi() call.
+		 */
+		xfs_bmap_init(&flist, &firstblock);
+		error = xfs_bunmapi(NULL, ip, start_fsb, 1, 0, 1, &firstblock,
+					&flist, &done);
+		if (error)
+			break;
+
+		ASSERT(!flist.xbf_count && !flist.xbf_first);
+next_block:
+		start_fsb++;
+		remaining--;
+	} while(remaining > 0);
+
+	return error;
+}