aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/ubifs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>2011-05-02 22:34:39 +0300
committerArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>2011-05-13 19:23:57 +0300
commit45cd5cddbfbdf0993dbc76d06ed77d0bf547b421 (patch)
tree90fb0e0924d94de9b6a5d2dc3b27841fd882c5d5 /fs/ubifs
parent69f8a75a7d9db05a7ee708514d605ab74956c73e (diff)
UBIFS: fix debugging FS checking failure
When the debugging self-checks are enabled, we go trough whole file-system after mount and check/validate every single node referred to by the index. This is implemented by the 'dbg_check_filesystem()' function. However, this function fails if we mount "unclean" file-system, i.e., if we mount the file-system after a power cut. It fails with the following symptoms: UBIFS DBG (pid 8171): ubifs_recover_size: ino 937 size 3309925 -> 3317760 UBIFS: recovery deferred UBIFS error (pid 8171): check_leaf: data node at LEB 1000:0 is not within inode size 3309925 The reason of failure is that recovery fixed up the inode size in memory, but not on the flash so far. So the value on the flash is incorrect so far, and would be corrected when we re-mount R/W. But 'check_leaf()' ignores this fact and tries to validate the size of the on-flash inode, which is incorrect, so it fails. This patch teaches the checking code to look at the VFS inode cache first, and if there is the inode in question, use that inode instead of the inode on the flash media. This fixes the issue. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/ubifs')
-rw-r--r--fs/ubifs/debug.c41
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/debug.c b/fs/ubifs/debug.c
index f7515bd38b4..b5ba2ea5b62 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/debug.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/debug.c
@@ -1818,6 +1818,8 @@ static struct fsck_inode *add_inode(struct ubifs_info *c,
struct rb_node **p, *parent = NULL;
struct fsck_inode *fscki;
ino_t inum = key_inum_flash(c, &ino->key);
+ struct inode *inode;
+ struct ubifs_inode *ui;
p = &fsckd->inodes.rb_node;
while (*p) {
@@ -1841,19 +1843,46 @@ static struct fsck_inode *add_inode(struct ubifs_info *c,
if (!fscki)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ inode = ilookup(c->vfs_sb, inum);
+
fscki->inum = inum;
- fscki->nlink = le32_to_cpu(ino->nlink);
- fscki->size = le64_to_cpu(ino->size);
- fscki->xattr_cnt = le32_to_cpu(ino->xattr_cnt);
- fscki->xattr_sz = le32_to_cpu(ino->xattr_size);
- fscki->xattr_nms = le32_to_cpu(ino->xattr_names);
- fscki->mode = le32_to_cpu(ino->mode);
+ /*
+ * If the inode is present in the VFS inode cache, use it instead of
+ * the on-flash inode which might be out-of-date. E.g., the size might
+ * be out-of-date. If we do not do this, the following may happen, for
+ * example:
+ * 1. A power cut happens
+ * 2. We mount the file-system R/O, the replay process fixes up the
+ * inode size in the VFS cache, but on on-flash.
+ * 3. 'check_leaf()' fails because it hits a data node beyond inode
+ * size.
+ */
+ if (!inode) {
+ fscki->nlink = le32_to_cpu(ino->nlink);
+ fscki->size = le64_to_cpu(ino->size);
+ fscki->xattr_cnt = le32_to_cpu(ino->xattr_cnt);
+ fscki->xattr_sz = le32_to_cpu(ino->xattr_size);
+ fscki->xattr_nms = le32_to_cpu(ino->xattr_names);
+ fscki->mode = le32_to_cpu(ino->mode);
+ } else {
+ ui = ubifs_inode(inode);
+ fscki->nlink = inode->i_nlink;
+ fscki->size = inode->i_size;
+ fscki->xattr_cnt = ui->xattr_cnt;
+ fscki->xattr_sz = ui->xattr_size;
+ fscki->xattr_nms = ui->xattr_names;
+ fscki->mode = inode->i_mode;
+ iput(inode);
+ }
+
if (S_ISDIR(fscki->mode)) {
fscki->calc_sz = UBIFS_INO_NODE_SZ;
fscki->calc_cnt = 2;
}
+
rb_link_node(&fscki->rb, parent, p);
rb_insert_color(&fscki->rb, &fsckd->inodes);
+
return fscki;
}