UBIFS: introduce new flag for RO due to errors

The R/O state may have various reasons:

1. The UBI volume is R/O
2. The FS is mounted R/O
3. The FS switched to R/O mode because of an error

However, in UBIFS we have only one variable which represents cases
1 and 3 - 'c->ro_media'. Indeed, we set this to 1 if we switch to
R/O mode due to an error, and then we test it in many places to
make sure that we stop writing as soon as the error happens.

But this is very unclean. One consequence of this, for example, is
that in 'ubifs_remount_fs()' we use 'c->ro_media' to check whether
we are in R/O mode because on an error, and we print a message
in this case. However, if we are in R/O mode because the media
is R/O, our message is bogus.

This patch introduces new flag - 'c->ro_error' which is set when
we switch to R/O mode because of an error. It also changes all
"if (c->ro_media)" checks to "if (c->ro_error)" checks, because
this is what the checks actually mean. We do not need to check
for 'c->ro_media' because if the UBI volume is in R/O mode, we
do not allow R/W mounting, and now writes can happen. This is
guaranteed by VFS. But it is good to double-check this, so this
patch also adds many "ubifs_assert(!c->ro_media)" checks.

In the 'ubifs_remount_fs()' function this patch makes a bit more
changes - it fixes the error messages as well.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/io.c b/fs/ubifs/io.c
index 9432431bf59..18a4b8d7c84 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/io.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/io.c
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@
  */
 void ubifs_ro_mode(struct ubifs_info *c, int err)
 {
-	if (!c->ro_media) {
-		c->ro_media = 1;
+	if (!c->ro_error) {
+		c->ro_error = 1;
 		c->no_chk_data_crc = 0;
 		c->vfs_sb->s_flags |= MS_RDONLY;
 		ubifs_warn("switched to read-only mode, error %d", err);
@@ -359,8 +359,9 @@ int ubifs_wbuf_sync_nolock(struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf)
 	ubifs_assert(!(c->vfs_sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY));
 	ubifs_assert(!(wbuf->avail & 7));
 	ubifs_assert(wbuf->offs + c->min_io_size <= c->leb_size);
+	ubifs_assert(!c->ro_media);
 
-	if (c->ro_media)
+	if (c->ro_error)
 		return -EROFS;
 
 	ubifs_pad(c, wbuf->buf + wbuf->used, wbuf->avail);
@@ -440,11 +441,12 @@ int ubifs_bg_wbufs_sync(struct ubifs_info *c)
 {
 	int err, i;
 
+	ubifs_assert(!c->ro_media);
 	if (!c->need_wbuf_sync)
 		return 0;
 	c->need_wbuf_sync = 0;
 
-	if (c->ro_media) {
+	if (c->ro_error) {
 		err = -EROFS;
 		goto out_timers;
 	}
@@ -519,6 +521,7 @@ int ubifs_wbuf_write_nolock(struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf, void *buf, int len)
 	ubifs_assert(!(wbuf->offs & 7) && wbuf->offs <= c->leb_size);
 	ubifs_assert(wbuf->avail > 0 && wbuf->avail <= c->min_io_size);
 	ubifs_assert(mutex_is_locked(&wbuf->io_mutex));
+	ubifs_assert(!c->ro_media);
 
 	if (c->leb_size - wbuf->offs - wbuf->used < aligned_len) {
 		err = -ENOSPC;
@@ -527,7 +530,7 @@ int ubifs_wbuf_write_nolock(struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf, void *buf, int len)
 
 	cancel_wbuf_timer_nolock(wbuf);
 
-	if (c->ro_media)
+	if (c->ro_error)
 		return -EROFS;
 
 	if (aligned_len <= wbuf->avail) {
@@ -663,8 +666,9 @@ int ubifs_write_node(struct ubifs_info *c, void *buf, int len, int lnum,
 	       buf_len);
 	ubifs_assert(lnum >= 0 && lnum < c->leb_cnt && offs >= 0);
 	ubifs_assert(offs % c->min_io_size == 0 && offs < c->leb_size);
+	ubifs_assert(!c->ro_media);
 
-	if (c->ro_media)
+	if (c->ro_error)
 		return -EROFS;
 
 	ubifs_prepare_node(c, buf, len, 1);