diff options
| author | Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org> | 2010-08-15 22:51:10 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> | 2010-10-04 21:10:10 +0200 |
| commit | db71922217a214e5c9268448e537b54fc1f301ea (patch) | |
| tree | 9c9afbf29411547891f6968e5ade29ce59d66c07 /fs/smbfs | |
| parent | 899611ee7d373e5eeda08e9a8632684e1ebbbf00 (diff) | |
BKL: Explicitly add BKL around get_sb/fill_super
This patch is a preparation necessary to remove the BKL from do_new_mount().
It explicitly adds calls to lock_kernel()/unlock_kernel() around
get_sb/fill_super operations for filesystems that still uses the BKL.
I've read through all the code formerly covered by the BKL inside
do_kern_mount() and have satisfied myself that it doesn't need the BKL
any more.
do_kern_mount() is already called without the BKL when mounting the rootfs
and in nfsctl. do_kern_mount() calls vfs_kern_mount(), which is called
from various places without BKL: simple_pin_fs(), nfs_do_clone_mount()
through nfs_follow_mountpoint(), afs_mntpt_do_automount() through
afs_mntpt_follow_link(). Both later functions are actually the filesystems
follow_link inode operation. vfs_kern_mount() is calling the specified
get_sb function and lets the filesystem do its job by calling the given
fill_super function.
Therefore I think it is safe to push down the BKL from the VFS to the
low-level filesystems get_sb/fill_super operation.
[arnd: do not add the BKL to those file systems that already
don't use it elsewhere]
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/smbfs')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/smbfs/inode.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/smbfs/inode.c b/fs/smbfs/inode.c index 450c9194198..8fc5e50e142 100644 --- a/fs/smbfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/smbfs/inode.c @@ -501,6 +501,8 @@ static int smb_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *raw_data, int silent) void *mem; static int warn_count; + lock_kernel(); + if (warn_count < 5) { warn_count++; printk(KERN_EMERG "smbfs is deprecated and will be removed" @@ -621,6 +623,7 @@ static int smb_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *raw_data, int silent) smb_new_dentry(sb->s_root); + unlock_kernel(); return 0; out_no_root: @@ -643,9 +646,11 @@ out_wrong_data: out_no_data: printk(KERN_ERR "smb_fill_super: missing data argument\n"); out_fail: + unlock_kernel(); return -EINVAL; out_no_server: printk(KERN_ERR "smb_fill_super: cannot allocate struct smb_sb_info\n"); + unlock_kernel(); return -ENOMEM; } |