[JFFS2] Quiet lockdep false positive.

Don't hold f->sem while calling into jffs2_do_create(). It makes lockdep
unhappy, and we don't really need it -- the _reason_ it's a false
positive is because nobody else can see this inode yet and so nobody
will be trying to lock it anyway.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/fs/jffs2/write.c b/fs/jffs2/write.c
index 665fce9797d..87891bdd791 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/write.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/write.c
@@ -438,10 +438,10 @@ int jffs2_do_create(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, struct jffs2_inode_info *dir_f, str
 	ret = jffs2_reserve_space(c, sizeof(*ri), &alloclen, ALLOC_NORMAL,
 				JFFS2_SUMMARY_INODE_SIZE);
 	D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "jffs2_do_create(): reserved 0x%x bytes\n", alloclen));
-	if (ret) {
-		mutex_unlock(&f->sem);
+	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-	}
+
+	mutex_lock(&f->sem);
 
 	ri->data_crc = cpu_to_je32(0);
 	ri->node_crc = cpu_to_je32(crc32(0, ri, sizeof(*ri)-8));