diff options
| author | Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> | 2013-07-09 22:36:45 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> | 2013-07-09 22:36:45 +0800 |
| commit | a8855990e382fc81c04187c5fdb48743307baf32 (patch) | |
| tree | e15bfdcd0a629be344d09113991dd2e613b747b7 /fs/block_dev.c | |
| parent | 8bb495e3f02401ee6f76d1b1d77f3ac9f079e376 (diff) | |
writeback: Do not sort b_io list only because of block device inode
It is very likely that block device inode will be part of BDI dirty list
as well. However it doesn't make sence to sort inodes on the b_io list
just because of this inode (as it contains buffers all over the device
anyway). So save some CPU cycles which is valuable since we hold relatively
contented wb->list_lock.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/block_dev.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/block_dev.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c index 2091db8cdd7..25623309820 100644 --- a/fs/block_dev.c +++ b/fs/block_dev.c @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static struct block_device *bd_acquire(struct inode *inode) return bdev; } -static inline int sb_is_blkdev_sb(struct super_block *sb) +int sb_is_blkdev_sb(struct super_block *sb) { return sb == blockdev_superblock; } |