diff options
author | Anand Avati <avati@redhat.com> | 2014-06-26 20:21:57 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2014-07-28 08:08:20 -0700 |
commit | 6e6dac54a24f12231915b527b20bd6a085d08dc7 (patch) | |
tree | 9550576eb5c8d1a699dea180f7ffff24dc2dad78 /fs/binfmt_som.c | |
parent | 67c53262040235888e8e8fa5e991f90f3551ca01 (diff) |
fuse: ignore entry-timeout on LOOKUP_REVAL
commit 154210ccb3a871e631bf39fdeb7a8731d98af87b upstream.
The following test case demonstrates the bug:
sh# mount -t glusterfs localhost:meta-test /mnt/one
sh# mount -t glusterfs localhost:meta-test /mnt/two
sh# echo stuff > /mnt/one/file; rm -f /mnt/two/file; echo stuff > /mnt/one/file
bash: /mnt/one/file: Stale file handle
sh# echo stuff > /mnt/one/file; rm -f /mnt/two/file; sleep 1; echo stuff > /mnt/one/file
On the second open() on /mnt/one, FUSE would have used the old
nodeid (file handle) trying to re-open it. Gluster is returning
-ESTALE. The ESTALE propagates back to namei.c:filename_lookup()
where lookup is re-attempted with LOOKUP_REVAL. The right
behavior now, would be for FUSE to ignore the entry-timeout and
and do the up-call revalidation. Instead FUSE is ignoring
LOOKUP_REVAL, succeeding the revalidation (because entry-timeout
has not passed), and open() is again retried on the old file
handle and finally the ESTALE is going back to the application.
Fix: if revalidation is happening with LOOKUP_REVAL, then ignore
entry-timeout and always do the up-call.
Signed-off-by: Anand Avati <avati@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/binfmt_som.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions