aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/firmware/cxgb3/t3b_psram-1.1.0.bin.ihex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>2011-03-03 11:01:37 -0500
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>2011-03-23 13:03:39 -0700
commit41fa53b856d81a90f41a26135369fb8f4f901214 (patch)
tree308db5fbbb0974d3bfc1126383fc54c85c1e7d46 /firmware/cxgb3/t3b_psram-1.1.0.bin.ihex
parent1bb392f30a34dfb18d72750fd9898f71b9ed7923 (diff)
x86: stop_machine_text_poke() should issue sync_core()
commit 0e00f7aed6af21fc09b2a94d28bc34e449bd3a53 upstream. Intel Archiecture Software Developer's Manual section 7.1.3 specifies that a core serializing instruction such as "cpuid" should be executed on _each_ core before the new instruction is made visible. Failure to do so can lead to unspecified behavior (Intel XMC erratas include General Protection Fault in the list), so we should avoid this at all cost. This problem can affect modified code executed by interrupt handlers after interrupt are re-enabled at the end of stop_machine, because no core serializing instruction is executed between the code modification and the moment interrupts are reenabled. Because stop_machine_text_poke performs the text modification from the first CPU decrementing stop_machine_first, modified code executed in thread context is also affected by this problem. To explain why, we have to split the CPUs in two categories: the CPU that initiates the text modification (calls text_poke_smp) and all the others. The scheduler, executed on all other CPUs after stop_machine, issues an "iret" core serializing instruction, and therefore handles core serialization for all these CPUs. However, the text modification initiator can continue its execution on the same thread and access the modified text without any scheduler call. Given that the CPU that initiates the code modification is not guaranteed to be the one actually performing the code modification, it falls into the XMC errata. Q: Isn't this executed from an IPI handler, which will return with IRET (a serializing instruction) anyway? A: No, now stop_machine uses per-cpu workqueue, so that handler will be executed from worker threads. There is no iret anymore. Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> LKML-Reference: <20110303160137.GB1590@Krystal> Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'firmware/cxgb3/t3b_psram-1.1.0.bin.ihex')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions