pinctrl: spawn U300 pinctrl from the COH901 GPIO

This solves the riddle on how the U300 pin controller shall be
able to reference the struct gpio_chip even though these are
two separate drivers: spawn the pinctrl child from the GPIO
driver and pass in the struct gpio_chip as platform data.
In the process we rename the U300 "pinmux-u300" to
"pinctrl-u300" so as not to confuse.

Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

2 files changed, 21 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-coh901.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-coh901.c
index eba232a46a8..b90c01144fe 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-coh901.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-coh901.c
@@ -705,7 +705,6 @@ static inline void u300_gpio_free_ports(struct u300_gpio *gpio)
 	list_for_each_safe(p, n, &gpio->port_list) {
 		port = list_entry(p, struct u300_gpio_port, node);
 		list_del(&port->node);
-		free_irq(port->irq, port);
 		kfree(port);
 	}
 }
@@ -861,10 +860,18 @@ static int __init u300_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto err_no_chip;
 	}
 
+	/* Spawn pin controller device as child of the GPIO, pass gpio chip */
+	plat->pinctrl_device->dev.platform_data = &gpio->chip;
+	err = platform_device_register(plat->pinctrl_device);
+	if (err)
+		goto err_no_pinctrl;
+
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gpio);
 
 	return 0;
 
+err_no_pinctrl:
+	err = gpiochip_remove(&gpio->chip);
 err_no_chip:
 err_no_port:
 	u300_gpio_free_ports(gpio);
@@ -919,7 +926,6 @@ static struct platform_driver u300_gpio_driver = {
 	.remove		= __exit_p(u300_gpio_remove),
 };
 
-
 static int __init u300_gpio_init(void)
 {
 	return platform_driver_probe(&u300_gpio_driver, u300_gpio_probe);
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-u300.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-u300.c
index c8d02f1c2b5..fc4a281caba 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-u300.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-u300.c
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
 #define U300_SYSCON_PMC4R_APP_MISC_16_APP_UART1_CTS		0x0100
 #define U300_SYSCON_PMC4R_APP_MISC_16_EMIF_1_STATIC_CS5_N	0x0200
 
-#define DRIVER_NAME "pinmux-u300"
+#define DRIVER_NAME "pinctrl-u300"
 
 /*
  * The DB3350 has 467 pads, I have enumerated the pads clockwise around the
@@ -1053,13 +1053,16 @@ static struct pinctrl_desc u300_pmx_desc = {
 	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
 };
 
-static int __init u300_pmx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int __devinit u300_pmx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct u300_pmx *upmx;
 	struct resource *res;
+	struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
 	int ret;
 	int i;
 
+	pr_err("U300 PMX PROBE\n");
+
 	/* Create state holders etc for this driver */
 	upmx = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*upmx), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!upmx)
@@ -1095,12 +1098,14 @@ static int __init u300_pmx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	/* We will handle a range of GPIO pins */
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(u300_gpio_ranges); i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(u300_gpio_ranges); i++) {
+		u300_gpio_ranges[i].gc = gpio_chip;
 		pinctrl_add_gpio_range(upmx->pctl, &u300_gpio_ranges[i]);
+	}
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, upmx);
 
-	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "initialized U300 pinmux driver\n");
+	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "initialized U300 pin control driver\n");
 
 	return 0;
 
@@ -1115,7 +1120,7 @@ out_no_resource:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int __exit u300_pmx_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int __devexit u300_pmx_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct u300_pmx *upmx = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 	int i;
@@ -1136,12 +1141,13 @@ static struct platform_driver u300_pmx_driver = {
 		.name = DRIVER_NAME,
 		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
 	},
-	.remove = __exit_p(u300_pmx_remove),
+	.probe = u300_pmx_probe,
+	.remove = __devexit_p(u300_pmx_remove),
 };
 
 static int __init u300_pmx_init(void)
 {
-	return platform_driver_probe(&u300_pmx_driver, u300_pmx_probe);
+	return platform_driver_register(&u300_pmx_driver);
 }
 arch_initcall(u300_pmx_init);