diff options
| author | Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> | 2009-10-18 23:51:09 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> | 2009-10-19 00:29:36 +0200 |
| commit | 84897fc0524d7cbfc81d0bdf9f92ade6e3c3816b (patch) | |
| tree | e24975ac12a1947c1a74dde7d23e795e27c41146 /drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c | |
| parent | 30514ccfc5651b0b1eb27d5ac1cb580b152cd85f (diff) | |
pcmcia: pccard_read_tuple and TUPLE_RETURN_COMMON cleanup
pccard_read_tuple(), which is only used by the PCMCIA core, should
handle TUPLE_RETURN_COMMON more sensibly: If a specific function (which
may be 0) is requested, set tuple.Attributes = 0 as was done in all
PCMCIA drivers. If, however, BIND_FN_ALL is requested, return the
"common" tuple. As to the callers of pccard_read_tuple():
- All calls to pcmcia_validate_cis() had set the "function" parameter to
BIND_FN_ALL. Therefore, remove the "function" parameter and make the
parameter to pccard_read_tuple explicit.
- Calls to CISTPL_VERS_1 and CISTPL_MANFID now set BIND_FN_ALL. This was
already the case for calls to CISTPL_LONGLINK_MFC.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c | 20 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c b/drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c index 4a110b7b267..6c4a4fc8363 100644 --- a/drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c @@ -1463,7 +1463,9 @@ int pccard_read_tuple(struct pcmcia_socket *s, unsigned int function, cisdata_t return -ENOMEM; } tuple.DesiredTuple = code; - tuple.Attributes = TUPLE_RETURN_COMMON; + tuple.Attributes = 0; + if (function == BIND_FN_ALL) + tuple.Attributes = TUPLE_RETURN_COMMON; ret = pccard_get_first_tuple(s, function, &tuple); if (ret != 0) goto done; @@ -1490,7 +1492,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pccard_read_tuple); ======================================================================*/ -int pccard_validate_cis(struct pcmcia_socket *s, unsigned int function, unsigned int *info) +int pccard_validate_cis(struct pcmcia_socket *s, unsigned int *info) { tuple_t *tuple; cisparse_t *p; @@ -1515,30 +1517,30 @@ int pccard_validate_cis(struct pcmcia_socket *s, unsigned int function, unsigned count = reserved = 0; tuple->DesiredTuple = RETURN_FIRST_TUPLE; tuple->Attributes = TUPLE_RETURN_COMMON; - ret = pccard_get_first_tuple(s, function, tuple); + ret = pccard_get_first_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, tuple); if (ret != 0) goto done; /* First tuple should be DEVICE; we should really have either that or a CFTABLE_ENTRY of some sort */ if ((tuple->TupleCode == CISTPL_DEVICE) || - (pccard_read_tuple(s, function, CISTPL_CFTABLE_ENTRY, p) == 0) || - (pccard_read_tuple(s, function, CISTPL_CFTABLE_ENTRY_CB, p) == 0)) + (pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_CFTABLE_ENTRY, p) == 0) || + (pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_CFTABLE_ENTRY_CB, p) == 0)) dev_ok++; /* All cards should have a MANFID tuple, and/or a VERS_1 or VERS_2 tuple, for card identification. Certain old D-Link and Linksys cards have only a broken VERS_2 tuple; hence the bogus test. */ - if ((pccard_read_tuple(s, function, CISTPL_MANFID, p) == 0) || - (pccard_read_tuple(s, function, CISTPL_VERS_1, p) == 0) || - (pccard_read_tuple(s, function, CISTPL_VERS_2, p) != -ENOSPC)) + if ((pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_MANFID, p) == 0) || + (pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_VERS_1, p) == 0) || + (pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_VERS_2, p) != -ENOSPC)) ident_ok++; if (!dev_ok && !ident_ok) goto done; for (count = 1; count < MAX_TUPLES; count++) { - ret = pccard_get_next_tuple(s, function, tuple); + ret = pccard_get_next_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, tuple); if (ret != 0) break; if (((tuple->TupleCode > 0x23) && (tuple->TupleCode < 0x40)) || |