md/raid5: Add support for new layouts for raid5 and raid6.

DDF uses different layouts for P and Q blocks than current md/raid6
so add those that are missing.
Also add support for RAID6 layouts that are identical to various
raid5 layouts with the simple addition of one device to hold all of
the 'Q' blocks.
Finally add 'raid5' layouts to match raid4.
These last to will allow online level conversion.

Note that this does not provide correct support for DDF/raid6 yet
as the order in which data blocks are summed to produce the Q block
is significant and different between current md code and DDF
requirements.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

1 files changed, 57 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.h b/drivers/md/raid5.h
index 0c7375ad12b..633d7928961 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.h
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.h
@@ -394,9 +394,62 @@ typedef struct raid5_private_data raid5_conf_t;
 /*
  * Our supported algorithms
  */
-#define ALGORITHM_LEFT_ASYMMETRIC	0
-#define ALGORITHM_RIGHT_ASYMMETRIC	1
-#define ALGORITHM_LEFT_SYMMETRIC	2
-#define ALGORITHM_RIGHT_SYMMETRIC	3
+#define ALGORITHM_LEFT_ASYMMETRIC	0 /* Rotating Parity N with Data Restart */
+#define ALGORITHM_RIGHT_ASYMMETRIC	1 /* Rotating Parity 0 with Data Restart */
+#define ALGORITHM_LEFT_SYMMETRIC	2 /* Rotating Parity N with Data Continuation */
+#define ALGORITHM_RIGHT_SYMMETRIC	3 /* Rotating Parity 0 with Data Continuation */
 
+/* Define non-rotating (raid4) algorithms.  These allow
+ * conversion of raid4 to raid5.
+ */
+#define ALGORITHM_PARITY_0		4 /* P or P,Q are initial devices */
+#define ALGORITHM_PARITY_N		5 /* P or P,Q are final devices. */
+
+/* DDF RAID6 layouts differ from md/raid6 layouts in two ways.
+ * Firstly, the exact positioning of the parity block is slightly
+ * different between the 'LEFT_*' modes of md and the "_N_*" modes
+ * of DDF.
+ * Secondly, or order of datablocks over which the Q syndrome is computed
+ * is different.
+ * Consequently we have different layouts for DDF/raid6 than md/raid6.
+ * These layouts are from the DDFv1.2 spec.
+ * Interestingly DDFv1.2-Errata-A does not specify N_CONTINUE but
+ * leaves RLQ=3 as 'Vendor Specific'
+ */
+
+#define ALGORITHM_ROTATING_ZERO_RESTART	8 /* DDF PRL=6 RLQ=1 */
+#define ALGORITHM_ROTATING_N_RESTART	9 /* DDF PRL=6 RLQ=2 */
+#define ALGORITHM_ROTATING_N_CONTINUE	10 /*DDF PRL=6 RLQ=3 */
+
+
+/* For every RAID5 algorithm we define a RAID6 algorithm
+ * with exactly the same layout for data and parity, and
+ * with the Q block always on the last device (N-1).
+ * This allows trivial conversion from RAID5 to RAID6
+ */
+#define ALGORITHM_LEFT_ASYMMETRIC_6	16
+#define ALGORITHM_RIGHT_ASYMMETRIC_6	17
+#define ALGORITHM_LEFT_SYMMETRIC_6	18
+#define ALGORITHM_RIGHT_SYMMETRIC_6	19
+#define ALGORITHM_PARITY_0_6		20
+#define ALGORITHM_PARITY_N_6		ALGORITHM_PARITY_N
+
+static inline int algorithm_valid_raid5(int layout)
+{
+	return (layout >= 0) &&
+		(layout <= 5);
+}
+static inline int algorithm_valid_raid6(int layout)
+{
+	return (layout >= 0 && layout <= 5)
+		||
+		(layout == 8 || layout == 10)
+		||
+		(layout >= 16 && layout <= 20);
+}
+
+static inline int algorithm_is_DDF(int layout)
+{
+	return layout >= 8 && layout <= 10;
+}
 #endif