diff options
author | Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> | 2012-09-21 22:47:34 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> | 2012-09-22 21:15:08 +0200 |
commit | 6f3c77b040fc24708228607bba504878de5236d1 (patch) | |
tree | 7959e694191ba0b0daa5a238b0e3dd65a7de7159 /drivers/base | |
parent | 5698bd757d55b1bb87edd1a9744ab09c142abfc2 (diff) |
PM / Runtime: let rpm_resume() succeed if RPM_ACTIVE, even when disabled, v2
There are several drivers where the return value of
pm_runtime_get_sync() is used to decide whether or not it is safe to
access hardware and that don't provide .suspend() callbacks for system
suspend (but may use late/noirq callbacks.) If such a driver happens
to call pm_runtime_get_sync() during system suspend, after the core
has disabled runtime PM, it will get the error code and will decide
that the hardware should not be accessed, although this may be a wrong
conclusion, depending on the state of the device when runtime PM was
disabled.
Drivers might work around this problem by using a test like:
ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
if (!ret || (ret == -EACCES && driver_private_data(dev)->suspended)) {
/* access hardware */
}
where driver_private_data(dev)->suspended is a flag set by the
driver's .suspend() method (that would have to be added for this
purpose). However, that potentially would need to be done by multiple
drivers which means quite a lot of duplicated code and bloat.
To avoid that we can use the observation that the core sets
dev->power.is_suspended before disabling runtime PM and use that
instead of the driver's private flag. Still, potentially many drivers
would need to repeat that same check in quite a few places, so it's
better to let the core do it.
Then we can be a bit smarter and check whether or not runtime PM was
disabled by the core only (disable_depth == 1) or by someone else in
addition to the core (disable_depth > 1). In the former case
rpm_resume() can return 1 if the runtime PM status is RPM_ACTIVE,
because it means the device was active when the core disabled runtime
PM. In the latter case it should still return -EACCES, because it
isn't clear why runtime PM has been disabled.
Tested on AM3730/Beagle-xM where a wakeup IRQ firing during the late
suspend phase triggers runtime PM activity in the I2C driver since the
wakeup IRQ is on an I2C-connected PMIC.
[rjw: Modified whitespace to follow the file's convention.]
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/base')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c index 7d9c1cb1c39..3148b10dc2e 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c @@ -509,6 +509,9 @@ static int rpm_resume(struct device *dev, int rpmflags) repeat: if (dev->power.runtime_error) retval = -EINVAL; + else if (dev->power.disable_depth == 1 && dev->power.is_suspended + && dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_ACTIVE) + retval = 1; else if (dev->power.disable_depth > 0) retval = -EACCES; if (retval) |