aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>2010-02-13 10:33:12 +0200
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>2010-04-26 07:41:28 -0700
commite422a4a5d60c8dbef19df3ea16aaf7556cd26223 (patch)
tree2599c1c38c709a66f49b4126ef4b01a03b7306d0 /arch
parentf9a05e26cad0db0dd9299bb43443319e79a6de7e (diff)
x86-64, rwsem: Avoid store forwarding hazard in __downgrade_write
commit 0d1622d7f526311d87d7da2ee7dd14b73e45d3fc upstream. The Intel Architecture Optimization Reference Manual states that a short load that follows a long store to the same object will suffer a store forwading penalty, particularly if the two accesses use different addresses. Trivially, a long load that follows a short store will also suffer a penalty. __downgrade_write() in rwsem incurs both penalties: the increment operation will not be able to reuse a recently-loaded rwsem value, and its result will not be reused by any recently-following rwsem operation. A comment in the code states that this is because 64-bit immediates are special and expensive; but while they are slightly special (only a single instruction allows them), they aren't expensive: a test shows that two loops, one loading a 32-bit immediate and one loading a 64-bit immediate, both take 1.5 cycles per iteration. Fix this by changing __downgrade_write to use the same add instruction on i386 and on x86_64, so that it uses the same operand size as all the other rwsem functions. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> LKML-Reference: <1266049992-17419-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h25
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
index 10204a25bf9..606ede12697 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -232,34 +232,19 @@ static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
*/
static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-# if RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS != -0x100000000
-# error "This code assumes RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS == -2^32"
-# endif
-
- /* 64-bit immediates are special and expensive, and not needed here */
- asm volatile("# beginning __downgrade_write\n\t"
- LOCK_PREFIX "incl 4(%1)\n\t"
- /* transitions 0xZZZZZZZZ00000001 -> 0xYYYYYYYY00000001 */
- " jns 1f\n\t"
- " call call_rwsem_downgrade_wake\n"
- "1:\n\t"
- "# ending __downgrade_write\n"
- : "+m" (sem->count)
- : "a" (sem)
- : "memory", "cc");
-#else
asm volatile("# beginning __downgrade_write\n\t"
LOCK_PREFIX _ASM_ADD "%2,(%1)\n\t"
- /* transitions 0xZZZZ0001 -> 0xYYYY0001 */
+ /*
+ * transitions 0xZZZZ0001 -> 0xYYYY0001 (i386)
+ * 0xZZZZZZZZ00000001 -> 0xYYYYYYYY00000001 (x86_64)
+ */
" jns 1f\n\t"
" call call_rwsem_downgrade_wake\n"
"1:\n\t"
"# ending __downgrade_write\n"
: "+m" (sem->count)
- : "a" (sem), "i" (-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
+ : "a" (sem), "er" (-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
: "memory", "cc");
-#endif
}
/*