diff options
| author | Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> | 2009-03-30 18:50:19 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> | 2009-05-02 10:23:38 -0700 |
| commit | 512378cd937c9b7692b8382cbfe10f6b6504086b (patch) | |
| tree | e8b9a6b833d61fada517c6a3b418e0e6087cbec9 /arch/x86/pci/i386.c | |
| parent | 1a2c1f821c51cbd2afd86f752b9bd510607a3695 (diff) | |
x86, PAT, PCI: Change vma prot in pci_mmap to reflect inherited prot
upstream commit: 9cdec049389ce2c324fd1ec508a71528a27d4a07
While looking at the issue in the thread:
http://marc.info/?l=dri-devel&m=123606627824556&w=2
noticed a bug in pci PAT code and memory type setting.
PCI mmap code did not set the proper protection in vma, when it
inherited protection in reserve_memtype. This bug only affects
the case where there exists a WC mapping before X does an mmap
with /proc or /sys pci interface. This will cause X userlevel
mmap from /proc or /sysfs to fail on fork.
Reported-by: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <20090323190720.GA16831@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/pci/i386.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/pci/i386.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c index 8791fc55e71..b4b899a8ffc 100644 --- a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c +++ b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c @@ -326,6 +326,9 @@ int pci_mmap_page_range(struct pci_dev *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma, return -EINVAL; } flags = new_flags; + vma->vm_page_prot = __pgprot( + (pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) & ~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK) | + flags); } if (((vma->vm_pgoff < max_low_pfn_mapped) || |