diff options
| author | Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> | 2009-04-09 18:48:34 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2009-04-09 19:28:24 +0200 |
| commit | 36cd3c9f925b9307236505ae7ad1ad7ac4d4357c (patch) | |
| tree | d9be68502d0f11b2259427e9ee8320891367143c /arch/Kconfig | |
| parent | 022624a758dc9489388a99ad29577b4c8c09237c (diff) | |
mutex: have non-spinning mutexes on s390 by default
Impact: performance regression fix for s390
The adaptive spinning mutexes will not always do what one would expect on
virtualized architectures like s390. Especially the cpu_relax() loop in
mutex_spin_on_owner might hurt if the mutex holding cpu has been scheduled
away by the hypervisor.
We would end up in a cpu_relax() loop when there is no chance that the
state of the mutex changes until the target cpu has been scheduled again by
the hypervisor.
For that reason we should change the default behaviour to no-spin on s390.
We do have an instruction which allows to yield the current cpu in favour of
a different target cpu. Also we have an instruction which allows us to figure
out if the target cpu is physically backed.
However we need to do some performance tests until we can come up with
a solution that will do the right thing on s390.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090409184834.7a0df7b2@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/Kconfig')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/Kconfig | 3 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig index dc81b34c5d8..78a35e9dc10 100644 --- a/arch/Kconfig +++ b/arch/Kconfig @@ -109,3 +109,6 @@ config HAVE_CLK config HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG bool + +config HAVE_DEFAULT_NO_SPIN_MUTEXES + bool |