Merge branch 'origin'

Conflicts:
	Documentation/video4linux/CARDLIST.cx88
	drivers/media/video/cx88/Kconfig
	drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-video.c
	drivers/media/video/saa7134/saa7134-dvb.c

Resolved as in the original merge by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

46 files changed, 3606 insertions, 530 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt b/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt
index fcbcbc35b12..6221464d1a7 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt
@@ -90,16 +90,20 @@ at OLS.  The resulting abundance of RCU patches was presented the
 following year [McKenney02a], and use of RCU in dcache was first
 described that same year [Linder02a].
 
-Also in 2002, Michael [Michael02b,Michael02a] presented techniques
-that defer the destruction of data structures to simplify non-blocking
-synchronization (wait-free synchronization, lock-free synchronization,
-and obstruction-free synchronization are all examples of non-blocking
-synchronization).  In particular, this technique eliminates locking,
-reduces contention, reduces memory latency for readers, and parallelizes
-pipeline stalls and memory latency for writers.  However, these
-techniques still impose significant read-side overhead in the form of
-memory barriers.  Researchers at Sun worked along similar lines in the
-same timeframe [HerlihyLM02,HerlihyLMS03].
+Also in 2002, Michael [Michael02b,Michael02a] presented "hazard-pointer"
+techniques that defer the destruction of data structures to simplify
+non-blocking synchronization (wait-free synchronization, lock-free
+synchronization, and obstruction-free synchronization are all examples of
+non-blocking synchronization).  In particular, this technique eliminates
+locking, reduces contention, reduces memory latency for readers, and
+parallelizes pipeline stalls and memory latency for writers.  However,
+these techniques still impose significant read-side overhead in the
+form of memory barriers.  Researchers at Sun worked along similar lines
+in the same timeframe [HerlihyLM02,HerlihyLMS03].  These techniques
+can be thought of as inside-out reference counts, where the count is
+represented by the number of hazard pointers referencing a given data
+structure (rather than the more conventional counter field within the
+data structure itself).
 
 In 2003, the K42 group described how RCU could be used to create
 hot-pluggable implementations of operating-system functions.  Later that
@@ -113,7 +117,6 @@ number of operating-system kernels [PaulEdwardMcKenneyPhD], a paper
 describing how to make RCU safe for soft-realtime applications [Sarma04c],
 and a paper describing SELinux performance with RCU [JamesMorris04b].
 
-
 2005 has seen further adaptation of RCU to realtime use, permitting
 preemption of RCU realtime critical sections [PaulMcKenney05a,
 PaulMcKenney05b].
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
index e118a7c1a09..49e27cc1938 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
@@ -177,3 +177,9 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
 
 	If you want to wait for some of these other things, you might
 	instead need to use synchronize_irq() or synchronize_sched().
+
+12.	Any lock acquired by an RCU callback must be acquired elsewhere
+	with irq disabled, e.g., via spin_lock_irqsave().  Failing to
+	disable irq on a given acquisition of that lock will result in
+	deadlock as soon as the RCU callback happens to interrupt that
+	acquisition's critical section.
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
index f8a54fa0d8a..1fd175368a8 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ entry does not exist.  For this to be helpful, the search function must
 return holding the per-entry spinlock, as ipc_lock() does in fact do.
 
 Quick Quiz:  Why does the search function need to return holding the
-per-entry lock for this deleted-flag technique to be helpful?
+	per-entry lock for this deleted-flag technique to be helpful?
 
 If the system-call audit module were to ever need to reject stale data,
 one way to accomplish this would be to add a "deleted" flag and a "lock"
@@ -275,8 +275,8 @@ flag under the spinlock as follows:
 	{
 		struct audit_entry  *e;
 
-		/* Do not use the _rcu iterator here, since this is the only
-		 * deletion routine. */
+		/* Do not need to use the _rcu iterator here, since this
+		 * is the only deletion routine. */
 		list_for_each_entry(e, list, list) {
 			if (!audit_compare_rule(rule, &e->rule)) {
 				spin_lock(&e->lock);
@@ -304,9 +304,12 @@ function to reject newly deleted data.
 
 
 Answer to Quick Quiz
-
-If the search function drops the per-entry lock before returning, then
-the caller will be processing stale data in any case.  If it is really
-OK to be processing stale data, then you don't need a "deleted" flag.
-If processing stale data really is a problem, then you need to hold the
-per-entry lock across all of the code that uses the value looked up.
+	Why does the search function need to return holding the per-entry
+	lock for this deleted-flag technique to be helpful?
+
+	If the search function drops the per-entry lock before returning,
+	then the caller will be processing stale data in any case.  If it
+	is really OK to be processing stale data, then you don't need a
+	"deleted" flag.  If processing stale data really is a problem,
+	then you need to hold the per-entry lock across all of the code
+	that uses the value that was returned.
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt
index 6fa09225158..02e27bf1d36 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt
@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ o	What are all these files in this directory?
 
 		You are reading it!
 
+	rcuref.txt
+
+		Describes how to combine use of reference counts
+		with RCU.
+
 	whatisRCU.txt
 
 		Overview of how the RCU implementation works.  Along
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rcuref.txt b/Documentation/RCU/rcuref.txt
index 3f60db41b2f..451de2ad832 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/rcuref.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/rcuref.txt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-Refcounter design for elements of lists/arrays protected by RCU.
+Reference-count design for elements of lists/arrays protected by RCU.
 
-Refcounting on elements of  lists which are protected by traditional
-reader/writer spinlocks or semaphores are straight forward as in:
+Reference counting on elements of lists which are protected by traditional
+reader/writer spinlocks or semaphores are straightforward:
 
 1.				2.
 add()				search_and_reference()
@@ -28,12 +28,12 @@ release_referenced()			delete()
 					    ...
 					}
 
-If this list/array is made lock free using rcu as in changing the
-write_lock in add() and delete() to spin_lock and changing read_lock
+If this list/array is made lock free using RCU as in changing the
+write_lock() in add() and delete() to spin_lock and changing read_lock
 in search_and_reference to rcu_read_lock(), the atomic_get in
 search_and_reference could potentially hold reference to an element which
-has already been deleted from the list/array.  atomic_inc_not_zero takes
-care of this scenario. search_and_reference should look as;
+has already been deleted from the list/array.  Use atomic_inc_not_zero()
+in this scenario as follows:
 
 1.					2.
 add()					search_and_reference()
@@ -51,17 +51,16 @@ add()					search_and_reference()
 release_referenced()			delete()
 {					{
     ...					    write_lock(&list_lock);
-    atomic_dec(&el->rc, relfunc)	    ...
-    ...					    delete_element
-}					    write_unlock(&list_lock);
- 					    ...
+    if (atomic_dec_and_test(&el->rc))       ...
+        call_rcu(&el->head, el_free);       delete_element
+    ...                                     write_unlock(&list_lock);
+} 					    ...
 					    if (atomic_dec_and_test(&el->rc))
 					        call_rcu(&el->head, el_free);
 					    ...
 					}
 
-Sometimes, reference to the element need to be obtained in the
-update (write) stream.  In such cases, atomic_inc_not_zero might be an
-overkill since the spinlock serialising list updates are held. atomic_inc
-is to be used in such cases.
-
+Sometimes, a reference to the element needs to be obtained in the
+update (write) stream.  In such cases, atomic_inc_not_zero() might be
+overkill, since we hold the update-side spinlock.  One might instead
+use atomic_inc() in such cases.
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
index 15da16861fa..5ed85af8878 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
@@ -200,10 +200,11 @@ rcu_assign_pointer()
 	the new value, and also executes any memory-barrier instructions
 	required for a given CPU architecture.
 
-	Perhaps more important, it serves to document which pointers
-	are protected by RCU.  That said, rcu_assign_pointer() is most
-	frequently used indirectly, via the _rcu list-manipulation
-	primitives such as list_add_rcu().
+	Perhaps just as important, it serves to document (1) which
+	pointers are protected by RCU and (2) the point at which a
+	given structure becomes accessible to other CPUs.  That said,
+	rcu_assign_pointer() is most frequently used indirectly, via
+	the _rcu list-manipulation primitives such as list_add_rcu().
 
 rcu_dereference()
 
@@ -258,9 +259,11 @@ rcu_dereference()
 	locking.
 
 	As with rcu_assign_pointer(), an important function of
-	rcu_dereference() is to document which pointers are protected
-	by RCU.  And, again like rcu_assign_pointer(), rcu_dereference()
-	is typically used indirectly, via the _rcu list-manipulation
+	rcu_dereference() is to document which pointers are protected by
+	RCU, in particular, flagging a pointer that is subject to changing
+	at any time, including immediately after the rcu_dereference().
+	And, again like rcu_assign_pointer(), rcu_dereference() is
+	typically used indirectly, via the _rcu list-manipulation
 	primitives, such as list_for_each_entry_rcu().
 
 The following diagram shows how each API communicates among the
@@ -327,7 +330,7 @@ for specialized uses, but are relatively uncommon.
 3.  WHAT ARE SOME EXAMPLE USES OF CORE RCU API?
 
 This section shows a simple use of the core RCU API to protect a
-global pointer to a dynamically allocated structure.  More typical
+global pointer to a dynamically allocated structure.  More-typical
 uses of RCU may be found in listRCU.txt, arrayRCU.txt, and NMI-RCU.txt.
 
 	struct foo {
@@ -410,6 +413,8 @@ o	Use synchronize_rcu() -after- removing a data element from an
 	data item.
 
 See checklist.txt for additional rules to follow when using RCU.
+And again, more-typical uses of RCU may be found in listRCU.txt,
+arrayRCU.txt, and NMI-RCU.txt.
 
 
 4.  WHAT IF MY UPDATING THREAD CANNOT BLOCK?
@@ -513,7 +518,7 @@ production-quality implementation, and see:
 
 for papers describing the Linux kernel RCU implementation.  The OLS'01
 and OLS'02 papers are a good introduction, and the dissertation provides
-more details on the current implementation.
+more details on the current implementation as of early 2004.
 
 
 5A.  "TOY" IMPLEMENTATION #1: LOCKING
@@ -768,7 +773,6 @@ RCU pointer/list traversal:
 	rcu_dereference
 	list_for_each_rcu		(to be deprecated in favor of
 					 list_for_each_entry_rcu)
-	list_for_each_safe_rcu		(deprecated, not used)
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu
 	list_for_each_continue_rcu	(to be deprecated in favor of new
 					 list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu)
@@ -807,7 +811,8 @@ Quick Quiz #1:	Why is this argument naive?  How could a deadlock
 Answer:		Consider the following sequence of events:
 
 		1.	CPU 0 acquires some unrelated lock, call it
-			"problematic_lock".
+			"problematic_lock", disabling irq via
+			spin_lock_irqsave().
 
 		2.	CPU 1 enters synchronize_rcu(), write-acquiring
 			rcu_gp_mutex.
@@ -894,7 +899,7 @@ Answer:		Just as PREEMPT_RT permits preemption of spinlock
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
 My thanks to the people who helped make this human-readable, including
-Jon Walpole, Josh Triplett, Serge Hallyn, and Suzanne Wood.
+Jon Walpole, Josh Triplett, Serge Hallyn, Suzanne Wood, and Alan Stern.
 
 
 For more information, see http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU.
diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
index 08c5d04f308..57a09f99ecb 100644
--- a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
 			Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>
 		ia64/x86_64:
 			Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
+		s390:
+			Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
 
 Authors: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
 Lots of feedback: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@austin.ibm.com>,
@@ -44,9 +46,28 @@ maxcpus=n    Restrict boot time cpus to n. Say if you have 4 cpus, using
              maxcpus=2 will only boot 2. You can choose to bring the
              other cpus later online, read FAQ's for more info.
 
-additional_cpus=n	[x86_64 only] use this to limit hotpluggable cpus.
-                        This option sets
-			cpu_possible_map = cpu_present_map + additional_cpus
+additional_cpus*=n	Use this to limit hotpluggable cpus. This option sets
+  			cpu_possible_map = cpu_present_map + additional_cpus
+
+(*) Option valid only for following architectures
+- x86_64, ia64, s390
+
+ia64 and x86_64 use the number of disabled local apics in ACPI tables MADT
+to determine the number of potentially hot-pluggable cpus. The implementation
+should only rely on this to count the #of cpus, but *MUST* not rely on the
+apicid values in those tables for disabled apics. In the event BIOS doesnt
+mark such hot-pluggable cpus as disabled entries, one could use this
+parameter "additional_cpus=x" to represent those cpus in the cpu_possible_map.
+
+s390 uses the number of cpus it detects at IPL time to also the number of bits
+in cpu_possible_map. If it is desired to add additional cpus at a later time
+the number should be specified using this option or the possible_cpus option.
+
+possible_cpus=n		[s390 only] use this to set hotpluggable cpus.
+			This option sets possible_cpus bits in
+			cpu_possible_map. Thus keeping the numbers of bits set
+			constant even if the machine gets rebooted.
+			This option overrides additional_cpus.
 
 CPU maps and such
 -----------------
diff --git a/Documentation/cpusets.txt b/Documentation/cpusets.txt
index 990998ee10b..30c41459953 100644
--- a/Documentation/cpusets.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cpusets.txt
@@ -4,8 +4,9 @@
 Copyright (C) 2004 BULL SA.
 Written by Simon.Derr@bull.net
 
-Portions Copyright (c) 2004 Silicon Graphics, Inc.
+Portions Copyright (c) 2004-2006 Silicon Graphics, Inc.
 Modified by Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
+Modified by Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
 
 CONTENTS:
 =========
@@ -90,7 +91,8 @@ This can be especially valuable on:
 
 These subsets, or "soft partitions" must be able to be dynamically
 adjusted, as the job mix changes, without impacting other concurrently
-executing jobs.
+executing jobs. The location of the running jobs pages may also be moved
+when the memory locations are changed.
 
 The kernel cpuset patch provides the minimum essential kernel
 mechanisms required to efficiently implement such subsets.  It
@@ -102,8 +104,8 @@ memory allocator code.
 1.3 How are cpusets implemented ?
 ---------------------------------
 
-Cpusets provide a Linux kernel (2.6.7 and above) mechanism to constrain
-which CPUs and Memory Nodes are used by a process or set of processes.
+Cpusets provide a Linux kernel mechanism to constrain which CPUs and
+Memory Nodes are used by a process or set of processes.
 
 The Linux kernel already has a pair of mechanisms to specify on which
 CPUs a task may be scheduled (sched_setaffinity) and on which Memory
@@ -371,22 +373,17 @@ cpusets memory placement policy 'mems' subsequently changes.
 If the cpuset flag file 'memory_migrate' is set true, then when
 tasks are attached to that cpuset, any pages that task had
 allocated to it on nodes in its previous cpuset are migrated
-to the tasks new cpuset.  Depending on the implementation,
-this migration may either be done by swapping the page out,
-so that the next time the page is referenced, it will be paged
-into the tasks new cpuset, usually on the node where it was
-referenced, or this migration may be done by directly copying
-the pages from the tasks previous cpuset to the new cpuset,
-where possible to the same node, relative to the new cpuset,
-as the node that held the page, relative to the old cpuset.
+to the tasks new cpuset. The relative placement of the page within
+the cpuset is preserved during these migration operations if possible.
+For example if the page was on the second valid node of the prior cpuset
+then the page will be placed on the second valid node of the new cpuset.
+
 Also if 'memory_migrate' is set true, then if that cpusets
 'mems' file is modified, pages allocated to tasks in that
 cpuset, that were on nodes in the previous setting of 'mems',
-will be moved to nodes in the new setting of 'mems.'  Again,
-depending on the implementation, this might be done by swapping,
-or by direct copying.  In either case, pages that were not in
-the tasks prior cpuset, or in the cpusets prior 'mems' setting,
-will not be moved.
+will be moved to nodes in the new setting of 'mems.'
+Pages that were not in the tasks prior cpuset, or in the cpusets
+prior 'mems' setting, will not be moved.
 
 There is an exception to the above.  If hotplug functionality is used
 to remove all the CPUs that are currently assigned to a cpuset,
@@ -434,16 +431,6 @@ and then start a subshell 'sh' in that cpuset:
   # The next line should display '/Charlie'
   cat /proc/self/cpuset
 
-In the case that a change of cpuset includes wanting to move already
-allocated memory pages, consider further the work of IWAMOTO
-Toshihiro <iwamoto@valinux.co.jp> for page remapping and memory
-hotremoval, which can be found at:
-
-  http://people.valinux.co.jp/~iwamoto/mh.html
-
-The integration of cpusets with such memory migration is not yet
-available.
-
 In the future, a C library interface to cpusets will likely be
 available.  For now, the only way to query or modify cpusets is
 via the cpuset file system, using the various cd, mkdir, echo, cat,
diff --git a/Documentation/cputopology.txt b/Documentation/cputopology.txt
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ff280e2e161
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/cputopology.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+
+Export cpu topology info by sysfs. Items (attributes) are similar
+to /proc/cpuinfo.
+
+1) /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/physical_package_id:
+represent the physical package id of  cpu X;
+2) /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/core_id:
+represent the cpu core id to cpu X;
+3) /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/thread_siblings:
+represent the thread siblings to cpu X in the same core;
+4) /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/core_siblings:
+represent the thread siblings to cpu X in the same physical package;
+
+To implement it in an architecture-neutral way, a new source file,
+driver/base/topology.c, is to export the 5 attributes.
+
+If one architecture wants to support this feature, it just needs to
+implement 4 defines, typically in file include/asm-XXX/topology.h.
+The 4 defines are:
+#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu)
+#define topology_core_id(cpu)
+#define topology_thread_siblings(cpu)
+#define topology_core_siblings(cpu)
+
+The type of **_id is int.
+The type of siblings is cpumask_t.
+
+To be consistent on all architectures, the 4 attributes should have
+deafult values if their values are unavailable. Below is the rule.
+1) physical_package_id: If cpu has no physical package id, -1 is the
+default value.
+2) core_id: If cpu doesn't support multi-core, its core id is 0.
+3) thread_siblings: Just include itself, if the cpu doesn't support
+HT/multi-thread.
+4) core_siblings: Just include itself, if the cpu doesn't support
+multi-core and HT/Multi-thread.
+
+So be careful when declaring the 4 defines in include/asm-XXX/topology.h.
+
+If an attribute isn't defined on an architecture, it won't be exported.
+
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-model/overview.txt b/Documentation/driver-model/overview.txt
index 44662735cf8..ac4a7a737e4 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-model/overview.txt
+++ b/Documentation/driver-model/overview.txt
@@ -1,50 +1,43 @@
 The Linux Kernel Device Model
 
-Patrick Mochel	<mochel@osdl.org>
+Patrick Mochel	<mochel@digitalimplant.org>
 
-26 August 2002
+Drafted 26 August 2002
+Updated 31 January 2006
 
 
 Overview
 ~~~~~~~~
 
-This driver model is a unification of all the current, disparate driver models
-that are currently in the kernel. It is intended to augment the
+The Linux Kernel Driver Model is a unification of all the disparate driver
+models that were previously used in the kernel. It is intended to augment the
 bus-specific drivers for bridges and devices by consolidating a set of data
 and operations into globally accessible data structures.
 
-Current driver models implement some sort of tree-like structure (sometimes
-just a list) for the devices they control. But, there is no linkage between
-the different bus types.
+Traditional driver models implemented some sort of tree-like structure
+(sometimes just a list) for the devices they control. There wasn't any
+uniformity across the different bus types.
 
-A common data structure can provide this linkage with little overhead: when a
-bus driver discovers a particular device, it can insert it into the global
-tree as well as its local tree. In fact, the local tree becomes just a subset
-of the global tree.
-
-Common data fields can also be moved out of the local bus models into the
-global model. Some of the manipulations of these fields can also be
-consolidated. Most likely, manipulation functions will become a set
-of helper functions, which the bus drivers wrap around to include any
-bus-specific items.
-
-The common device and bridge interface currently reflects the goals of the
-modern PC: namely the ability to do seamless Plug and Play, power management,
-and hot plug. (The model dictated by Intel and Microsoft (read: ACPI) ensures
-us that any device in the system may fit any of these criteria.)
-
-In reality, not every bus will be able to support such operations. But, most
-buses will support a majority of those operations, and all future buses will.
-In other words, a bus that doesn't support an operation is the exception,
-instead of the other way around.
+The current driver model provides a comon, uniform data model for describing
+a bus and the devices that can appear under the bus. The unified bus
+model includes a set of common attributes which all busses carry, and a set
+of common callbacks, such as device discovery during bus probing, bus
+shutdown, bus power management, etc.
 
+The common device and bridge interface reflects the goals of the modern
+computer: namely the ability to do seamless device "plug and play", power
+management, and hot plug. In particular, the model dictated by Intel and
+Microsoft (namely ACPI) ensures that almost every device on almost any bus
+on an x86-compatible system can work within this paradigm.  Of course,
+not every bus is able to support all such operations, although most
+buses support a most of those operations.
 
 
 Downstream Access
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 Common data fields have been moved out of individual bus layers into a common
-data structure. But, these fields must still be accessed by the bus layers,
+data structure. These fields must still be accessed by the bus layers,
 and sometimes by the device-specific drivers.
 
 Other bus layers are encouraged to do what has been done for the PCI layer.
@@ -53,7 +46,7 @@ struct pci_dev now looks like this:
 struct pci_dev {
 	...
 
-	struct device device;
+	struct device dev;
 };
 
 Note first that it is statically allocated. This means only one allocation on
@@ -64,9 +57,9 @@ the two.
 
 The PCI bus layer freely accesses the fields of struct device. It knows about
 the structure of struct pci_dev, and it should know the structure of struct
-device. PCI devices that have been converted generally do not touch the fields
-of struct device. More precisely, device-specific drivers should not touch
-fields of struct device unless there is a strong compelling reason to do so.
+device. Individual PCI device drivers that have been converted the the current
+driver model generally do not and should not touch the fields of struct device,
+unless there is a strong compelling reason to do so.
 
 This abstraction is prevention of unnecessary pain during transitional phases.
 If the name of the field changes or is removed, then every downstream driver
diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index b4a1ea76269..81bc51369f5 100644
--- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
@@ -148,3 +148,44 @@ Why:	The 8250 serial driver now has the ability to deal with the differences
 	brother on Alchemy SOCs.  The loss of features is not considered an
 	issue.
 Who:	Ralf B