aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/pwm.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2012-07-30 09:22:37 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2012-07-30 09:22:37 -0700
commit9ec97169e7d6afe2f8206d694d1411fb3bb49853 (patch)
tree9d24c8cd440a312f96b70db5cdaaef1136787003 /Documentation/pwm.txt
parenta410963ba4c0c768302f0298e258b1ee940e8316 (diff)
parent19891b20e7c275feb92d669f4b1879861f7e8c25 (diff)
Merge branch 'for-3.6' of git://gitorious.org/linux-pwm/linux-pwm
Pull PWM subsystem from Thierry Reding: "The new PWM subsystem aims at collecting all implementations of the legacy PWM API and to eventually replace it completely. The subsystem has been in development for over half a year now and many drivers have already been converted. It has been in linux-next for a couple of weeks and there have been no major issues so I think it is ready for inclusion in your tree." Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>: "Very much Ack on the new subsystem. It uses the interface declarations as the previously separate pwm drivers, so nothing changes for now in the drivers using it, although it enables us to change those more easily in the future if we want to. This work is also one of the missing pieces that are required to eventually build ARM kernels for multiple platforms, which is currently prohibited (amongs other things) by the fact that you cannot have more than one driver exporting the pwm functions." Tested-and-acked-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Acked-by: Philip, Avinash <avinashphilip@ti.com> # TI's AM33xx platforms Acked-By: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@gmail.com> # LPC32XX Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> Fix up trivial conflicts with other cleanups and DT updates. * 'for-3.6' of git://gitorious.org/linux-pwm/linux-pwm: (36 commits) pwm: pwm-tiehrpwm: PWM driver support for EHRPWM pwm: pwm-tiecap: PWM driver support for ECAP APWM pwm: fix used-uninitialized warning in pwm_get() pwm: add lpc32xx PWM support pwm_backlight: pass correct brightness to callback pwm: Use pr_* functions in pwm-samsung.c file pwm: Convert pwm-samsung to use devm_* APIs pwm: Convert pwm-tegra to use devm_clk_get() pwm: pwm-mxs: Return proper error if pwmchip_remove() fails pwm: pwm-bfin: Return proper error if pwmchip_remove() fails pwm: pxa: Propagate pwmchip_remove() error pwm: Convert pwm-pxa to use devm_* APIs pwm: Convert pwm-vt8500 to use devm_* APIs pwm: Convert pwm-imx to use devm_* APIs pwm: Conflict with legacy PWM API pwm: pwm-mxs: add pinctrl support pwm: pwm-mxs: use devm_* managed functions pwm: pwm-mxs: use global reset function stmp_reset_block pwm: pwm-mxs: encode soc name in compatible string pwm: Take over maintainership of the PWM subsystem ...
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/pwm.txt')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/pwm.txt76
1 files changed, 76 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/pwm.txt b/Documentation/pwm.txt
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..554290ebab9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/pwm.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) interface
+
+This provides an overview about the Linux PWM interface
+
+PWMs are commonly used for controlling LEDs, fans or vibrators in
+cell phones. PWMs with a fixed purpose have no need implementing
+the Linux PWM API (although they could). However, PWMs are often
+found as discrete devices on SoCs which have no fixed purpose. It's
+up to the board designer to connect them to LEDs or fans. To provide
+this kind of flexibility the generic PWM API exists.
+
+Identifying PWMs
+----------------
+
+Users of the legacy PWM API use unique IDs to refer to PWM devices.
+
+Instead of referring to a PWM device via its unique ID, board setup code
+should instead register a static mapping that can be used to match PWM
+consumers to providers, as given in the following example:
+
+ static struct pwm_lookup board_pwm_lookup[] = {
+ PWM_LOOKUP("tegra-pwm", 0, "pwm-backlight", NULL),
+ };
+
+ static void __init board_init(void)
+ {
+ ...
+ pwm_add_table(board_pwm_lookup, ARRAY_SIZE(board_pwm_lookup));
+ ...
+ }
+
+Using PWMs
+----------
+
+Legacy users can request a PWM device using pwm_request() and free it
+after usage with pwm_free().
+
+New users should use the pwm_get() function and pass to it the consumer
+device or a consumer name. pwm_put() is used to free the PWM device.
+
+After being requested a PWM has to be configured using:
+
+int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns);
+
+To start/stop toggling the PWM output use pwm_enable()/pwm_disable().
+
+Implementing a PWM driver
+-------------------------
+
+Currently there are two ways to implement pwm drivers. Traditionally
+there only has been the barebone API meaning that each driver has
+to implement the pwm_*() functions itself. This means that it's impossible
+to have multiple PWM drivers in the system. For this reason it's mandatory
+for new drivers to use the generic PWM framework.
+
+A new PWM controller/chip can be added using pwmchip_add() and removed
+again with pwmchip_remove(). pwmchip_add() takes a filled in struct
+pwm_chip as argument which provides a description of the PWM chip, the
+number of PWM devices provider by the chip and the chip-specific
+implementation of the supported PWM operations to the framework.
+
+Locking
+-------
+
+The PWM core list manipulations are protected by a mutex, so pwm_request()
+and pwm_free() may not be called from an atomic context. Currently the
+PWM core does not enforce any locking to pwm_enable(), pwm_disable() and
+pwm_config(), so the calling context is currently driver specific. This
+is an issue derived from the former barebone API and should be fixed soon.
+
+Helpers
+-------
+
+Currently a PWM can only be configured with period_ns and duty_ns. For several
+use cases freq_hz and duty_percent might be better. Instead of calculating
+this in your driver please consider adding appropriate helpers to the framework.