diff options
author | Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> | 2010-12-22 14:18:50 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> | 2011-03-11 15:09:52 -0500 |
commit | 2e12978a9f7a7abd54e8eb9ce70a7718767b8b2c (patch) | |
tree | eb4f298e084b5bcc4922511237cd6ce2e158abdd | |
parent | a5abba989deceb731047425812d268daf7536575 (diff) |
futex,plist: Pass the real head of the priority list to plist_del()
Some plist_del()s in kernel/futex.c are passed a faked head of the
priority list.
It does not fail because the current code does not require the real head
in plist_del(). The current code of plist_del() just uses the head for checking,
so it will not cause a bad result even when we use a faked head.
But it is undocumented usage:
/**
* plist_del - Remove a @node from plist.
*
* @node: &struct plist_node pointer - entry to be removed
* @head: &struct plist_head pointer - list head
*/
The document says that the @head is the "list head" head of the priority list.
In futex code, several places use "plist_del(&q->list, &q->list.plist);",
they pass a fake head. We need to fix them all.
Thanks to Darren Hart for many suggestions.
Acked-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
LKML-Reference: <4D11984A.5030203@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/futex.c | 31 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c index b766d28accd..6feeea4f8f1 100644 --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -775,6 +775,24 @@ retry: return ret; } +/** + * __unqueue_futex() - Remove the futex_q from its futex_hash_bucket + * @q: The futex_q to unqueue + * + * The q->lock_ptr must not be NULL and must be held by the caller. + */ +static void __unqueue_futex(struct futex_q *q) +{ + struct futex_hash_bucket *hb; + + if (WARN_ON(!q->lock_ptr || !spin_is_locked(q->lock_ptr) + || plist_node_empty(&q->list))) + return; + + hb = container_of(q->lock_ptr, struct futex_hash_bucket, lock); + plist_del(&q->list, &hb->chain); +} + /* * The hash bucket lock must be held when this is called. * Afterwards, the futex_q must not be accessed. @@ -792,7 +810,7 @@ static void wake_futex(struct futex_q *q) */ get_task_struct(p); - plist_del(&q->list, &q->list.plist); + __unqueue_futex(q); /* * The waiting task can free the futex_q as soon as * q->lock_ptr = NULL is written, without taking any locks. A @@ -1100,8 +1118,7 @@ void requeue_pi_wake_futex(struct futex_q *q, union futex_key *key, get_futex_key_refs(key); q->key = *key; - WARN_ON(plist_node_empty(&q->list)); - plist_del(&q->list, &q->list.plist); + __unqueue_futex(q); WARN_ON(!q->rt_waiter); q->rt_waiter = NULL; @@ -1504,8 +1521,7 @@ retry: spin_unlock(lock_ptr); goto retry; } - WARN_ON(plist_node_empty(&q->list)); - plist_del(&q->list, &q->list.plist); + __unqueue_futex(q); BUG_ON(q->pi_state); @@ -1525,8 +1541,7 @@ retry: static void unqueue_me_pi(struct futex_q *q) __releases(q->lock_ptr) { - WARN_ON(plist_node_empty(&q->list)); - plist_del(&q->list, &q->list.plist); + __unqueue_futex(q); BUG_ON(!q->pi_state); free_pi_state(q->pi_state); @@ -2167,7 +2182,7 @@ int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, * We were woken prior to requeue by a timeout or a signal. * Unqueue the futex_q and determine which it was. */ - plist_del(&q->list, &q->list.plist); + plist_del(&q->list, &hb->chain); /* Handle spurious wakeups gracefully */ ret = -EWOULDBLOCK; |