diff options
| author | Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk> | 2009-03-29 23:03:01 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2009-04-02 01:33:50 -0700 |
| commit | 3943ac5d99ec024f97442e5f3def1034bb0b1bb0 (patch) | |
| tree | d3167de5bbe5d566f58f951381f2cbcde28cde90 | |
| parent | 9ba30d74446dd0629d797ecd038379725d351bc6 (diff) | |
Doc: Fix wrong API example usage of call_rcu().
At some point the API of call_rcu() changed from three parameters
to two parameters, correct the documentation.
One confusing thing in RCU/listRCU.txt, which is NOT fixed in this patch,
is that no reason or explaination is given for using call_rcu() instead of
the normal synchronize_rcu() call.
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt index 1fd175368a8..4349c1487e9 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ Following are the RCU equivalents for these two functions: list_for_each_entry(e, list, list) { if (!audit_compare_rule(rule, &e->rule)) { list_del_rcu(&e->list); - call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule, e); + call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule); return 0; } } @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ RCU ("read-copy update") its name. The RCU code is as follows: ne->rule.action = newaction; ne->rule.file_count = newfield_count; list_replace_rcu(e, ne); - call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule, e); + call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule); return 0; } } @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ flag under the spinlock as follows: list_del_rcu(&e->list); e->deleted = 1; spin_unlock(&e->lock); - call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule, e); + call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule); return 0; } } |