diff options
| author | Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> | 2012-06-06 14:52:51 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2012-06-06 16:52:25 +0200 |
| commit | 10717dcde10d09f9fcee53a12a4236af1a82b484 (patch) | |
| tree | ef7fa575d2bec5631201cd72c5764f042650e382 | |
| parent | ceb1cbac8eda66cf0f889def226b4e82f8ff857b (diff) | |
sched/numa: Load balance between remote nodes
Commit cb83b629b ("sched/numa: Rewrite the CONFIG_NUMA sched
domain support") removed the NODE sched domain and started checking
if the node distance in SLIT table is farther than REMOTE_DISTANCE,
if so, it will lose the load balance chance at exec/fork/wake_affine
points.
But actually, even the node distance is farther than REMOTE_DISTANCE.
Modern CPUs also has QPI like connections, which ensures that memory
access is not too slow between nodes. So the above change in behavior
on NUMA machine causes a performance regression on various benchmarks:
hackbench, tbench, netperf, oltp, etc.
This patch will recover the scheduler behavior to old mode on all my
Intel platforms: NHM EP/EX, WSM EP, SNB EP/EP4S, and thus fixes the
perfromance regressions. (all of them just have 2 kinds distance, 10, 21)
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1338965571-9812-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/core.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index c46958e2612..6546083af3e 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -6321,7 +6321,7 @@ static int sched_domains_curr_level; static inline int sd_local_flags(int level) { - if (sched_domains_numa_distance[level] > REMOTE_DISTANCE) + if (sched_domains_numa_distance[level] > RECLAIM_DISTANCE) return 0; return SD_BALANCE_EXEC | SD_BALANCE_FORK | SD_WAKE_AFFINE; |