CIFS: Fix oplock break handling (try #2)

commit 12fed00de963433128b5366a21a55808fab2f756 upstream.

When we get oplock break notification we should set the appropriate
value of OplockLevel field in oplock break acknowledge according to
the oplock level held by the client in this time. As we only can have
level II oplock or no oplock in the case of oplock break, we should be
aware only about clientCanCacheRead field in cifsInodeInfo structure.

Also fix bug connected with wrong interpretation of OplockLevel field
during oplock break notification processing.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

3 files changed, 13 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
index 05a9b776e1a..76d9f64692e 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ extern int CIFSSMBLock(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon,
 			const __u16 netfid, const __u64 len,
 			const __u64 offset, const __u32 numUnlock,
 			const __u32 numLock, const __u8 lockType,
-			const bool waitFlag);
+			const bool waitFlag, const __u8 oplock_level);
 extern int CIFSSMBPosixLock(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon,
 			const __u16 smb_file_id, const int get_flag,
 			const __u64 len, struct file_lock *,
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
index 4e6dbab8443..04b755ae1b3 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
@@ -1641,7 +1641,8 @@ int
 CIFSSMBLock(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon,
 	    const __u16 smb_file_id, const __u64 len,
 	    const __u64 offset, const __u32 numUnlock,
-	    const __u32 numLock, const __u8 lockType, const bool waitFlag)
+	    const __u32 numLock, const __u8 lockType,
+	    const bool waitFlag, const __u8 oplock_level)
 {
 	int rc = 0;
 	LOCK_REQ *pSMB = NULL;
@@ -1669,6 +1670,7 @@ CIFSSMBLock(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon,
 	pSMB->NumberOfLocks = cpu_to_le16(numLock);
 	pSMB->NumberOfUnlocks = cpu_to_le16(numUnlock);
 	pSMB->LockType = lockType;
+	pSMB->OplockLevel = oplock_level;
 	pSMB->AndXCommand = 0xFF;	/* none */
 	pSMB->Fid = smb_file_id; /* netfid stays le */
 
diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index 8639dd79bd3..99387a4e141 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -827,12 +827,12 @@ int cifs_lock(struct file *file, int cmd, struct file_lock *pfLock)
 
 		/* BB we could chain these into one lock request BB */
 		rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, netfid, length, pfLock->fl_start,
-				 0, 1, lockType, 0 /* wait flag */ );
+				 0, 1, lockType, 0 /* wait flag */, 0);
 		if (rc == 0) {
 			rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, netfid, length,
 					 pfLock->fl_start, 1 /* numUnlock */ ,
 					 0 /* numLock */ , lockType,
-					 0 /* wait flag */ );
+					 0 /* wait flag */, 0);
 			pfLock->fl_type = F_UNLCK;
 			if (rc != 0)
 				cERROR(1, ("Error unlocking previously locked "
@@ -875,8 +875,8 @@ int cifs_lock(struct file *file, int cmd, struct file_lock *pfLock)
 
 		if (numLock) {
 			rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, netfid, length,
-					pfLock->fl_start,
-					0, numLock, lockType, wait_flag);
+					 pfLock->fl_start, 0, numLock, lockType,
+					 wait_flag, 0);
 
 			if (rc == 0) {
 				/* For Windows locks we must store them. */
@@ -896,9 +896,9 @@ int cifs_lock(struct file *file, int cmd, struct file_lock *pfLock)
 						(pfLock->fl_start + length) >=
 						(li->offset + li->length)) {
 					stored_rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon,
-							netfid,
-							li->length, li->offset,
-							1, 0, li->type, false);
+							netfid, li->length,
+							li->offset, 1, 0,
+							li->type, false, 0);
 					if (stored_rc)
 						rc = stored_rc;
 
@@ -2316,7 +2316,8 @@ cifs_oplock_break(struct slow_work *work)
 	 */
 	if (!cfile->closePend && !cfile->oplock_break_cancelled) {
 		rc = CIFSSMBLock(0, cifs_sb->tcon, cfile->netfid, 0, 0, 0, 0,
-				 LOCKING_ANDX_OPLOCK_RELEASE, false);
+				 LOCKING_ANDX_OPLOCK_RELEASE, false,
+				 cinode->clientCanCacheRead ? 1 : 0);
 		cFYI(1, ("Oplock release rc = %d", rc));
 	}
 }