Merge tag 'pm-fixes-for-3.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm

Power management fixes for 3.3

Two fixes for regressions introduced during the merge window, one fix for
a long-standing obscure issue in the computation of hibernate image size
and two small PM documentation fixes.

* tag 'pm-fixes-for-3.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
  PM / Sleep: Fix read_unlock_usermodehelper() call.
  PM / Hibernate: Rewrite unlock_system_sleep() to fix s2disk regression
  PM / Hibernate: Correct additional pages number calculation
  PM / Documentation: Fix minor issue in freezing_of_tasks.txt
  PM / Documentation: Fix spelling mistake in basic-pm-debugging.txt

5 files changed, 25 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/power/basic-pm-debugging.txt b/Documentation/power/basic-pm-debugging.txt
index 40a4c65f380..262acf56fa7 100644
--- a/Documentation/power/basic-pm-debugging.txt
+++ b/Documentation/power/basic-pm-debugging.txt
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ test at least a couple of times in a row for confidence.  [This is necessary,
 because some problems only show up on a second attempt at suspending and
 resuming the system.]  Moreover, hibernating in the "reboot" and "shutdown"
 modes causes the PM core to skip some platform-related callbacks which on ACPI
-systems might be necessary to make hibernation work.  Thus, if you machine fails
+systems might be necessary to make hibernation work.  Thus, if your machine fails
 to hibernate or resume in the "reboot" mode, you should try the "platform" mode:
 
 # echo platform > /sys/power/disk
diff --git a/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt b/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
index 6ccb68f68da..ebd7490ef1d 100644
--- a/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
+++ b/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
@@ -120,10 +120,10 @@ So in practice, the 'at all' may become a 'why freeze kernel threads?' and
 freezing user threads I don't find really objectionable."
 
 Still, there are kernel threads that may want to be freezable.  For example, if
-a kernel that belongs to a device driver accesses the device directly, it in
-principle needs to know when the device is suspended, so that it doesn't try to
-access it at that time.  However, if the kernel thread is freezable, it will be
-frozen before the driver's .suspend() callback is executed and it will be
+a kernel thread that belongs to a device driver accesses the device directly, it
+in principle needs to know when the device is suspended, so that it doesn't try
+to access it at that time.  However, if the kernel thread is freezable, it will
+be frozen before the driver's .suspend() callback is executed and it will be
 thawed after the driver's .resume() callback has run, so it won't be accessing
 the device while it's suspended.
 
diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
index 26ab358dac6..6c9387d646e 100644
--- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
+++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
@@ -525,8 +525,7 @@ static int _request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p,
 	if (!firmware) {
 		dev_err(device, "%s: kmalloc(struct firmware) failed\n",
 			__func__);
-		retval = -ENOMEM;
-		goto out;
+		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
 	if (fw_get_builtin_firmware(firmware, name)) {
diff --git a/include/linux/suspend.h b/include/linux/suspend.h
index 95040cc3310..91784a4f860 100644
--- a/include/linux/suspend.h
+++ b/include/linux/suspend.h
@@ -357,14 +357,29 @@ extern bool pm_save_wakeup_count(unsigned int count);
 
 static inline void lock_system_sleep(void)
 {
-	freezer_do_not_count();
+	current->flags |= PF_FREEZER_SKIP;
 	mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
 }
 
 static inline void unlock_system_sleep(void)
 {
+	/*
+	 * Don't use freezer_count() because we don't want the call to
+	 * try_to_freeze() here.
+	 *
+	 * Reason:
+	 * Fundamentally, we just don't need it, because freezing condition
+	 * doesn't come into effect until we release the pm_mutex lock,
+	 * since the freezer always works with pm_mutex held.
+	 *
+	 * More importantly, in the case of hibernation,
+	 * unlock_system_sleep() gets called in snapshot_read() and
+	 * snapshot_write() when the freezing condition is still in effect.
+	 * Which means, if we use try_to_freeze() here, it would make them
+	 * enter the refrigerator, thus causing hibernation to lockup.
+	 */
+	current->flags &= ~PF_FREEZER_SKIP;
 	mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
-	freezer_count();
 }
 
 #else /* !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
diff --git a/kernel/power/snapshot.c b/kernel/power/snapshot.c
index 1cf88900ec4..6a768e53700 100644
--- a/kernel/power/snapshot.c
+++ b/kernel/power/snapshot.c
@@ -812,7 +812,8 @@ unsigned int snapshot_additional_pages(struct zone *zone)
 	unsigned int res;
 
 	res = DIV_ROUND_UP(zone->spanned_pages, BM_BITS_PER_BLOCK);
-	res += DIV_ROUND_UP(res * sizeof(struct bm_block), PAGE_SIZE);
+	res += DIV_ROUND_UP(res * sizeof(struct bm_block),
+			    LINKED_PAGE_DATA_SIZE);
 	return 2 * res;
 }