diff options
| author | Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> | 2014-02-11 09:24:27 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2014-02-21 21:27:10 +0100 |
| commit | 495163420ab5398c84af96ca3eae2c6aa4a140da (patch) | |
| tree | da1e39f0ddd9dfef62c8a4ede06a1a1451474a13 | |
| parent | e9e7cb38c21c80c82af4b16608bb4c8c5ec6a28e (diff) | |
sched/core: Make dl_b->lock IRQ safe
Fix this lockdep warning:
[ 44.804600] =========================================================
[ 44.805746] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
[ 44.805746] 3.14.0-rc2-test+ #14 Not tainted
[ 44.805746] ---------------------------------------------------------
[ 44.805746] bash/3674 just changed the state of lock:
[ 44.805746] (&dl_b->lock){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff8106ad15>] sched_rt_handler+0x132/0x248
[ 44.805746] but this lock was taken by another, HARDIRQ-safe lock in the past:
[ 44.805746] (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}
and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
[ 44.805746]
[ 44.805746] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 44.805746] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[ 44.805746]
[ 44.805746] CPU0 CPU1
[ 44.805746] ---- ----
[ 44.805746] lock(&dl_b->lock);
[ 44.805746] local_irq_disable();
[ 44.805746] lock(&rq->lock);
[ 44.805746] lock(&dl_b->lock);
[ 44.805746] <Interrupt>
[ 44.805746] lock(&rq->lock);
by making dl_b->lock acquiring always IRQ safe.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1392107067-19907-3-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/core.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 98d33c10525..33d030a133d 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -7422,6 +7422,7 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void) u64 period = global_rt_period(); u64 new_bw = to_ratio(period, runtime); int cpu, ret = 0; + unsigned long flags; /* * Here we want to check the bandwidth not being set to some @@ -7435,10 +7436,10 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void) for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu); - raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags); if (new_bw < dl_b->total_bw) ret = -EBUSY; - raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags); if (ret) break; @@ -7451,6 +7452,7 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void) { u64 new_bw = -1; int cpu; + unsigned long flags; def_dl_bandwidth.dl_period = global_rt_period(); def_dl_bandwidth.dl_runtime = global_rt_runtime(); @@ -7464,9 +7466,9 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void) for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu); - raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags); dl_b->bw = new_bw; - raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags); } } |