diff options
author | Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> | 2006-11-05 09:03:18 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> | 2006-11-05 09:03:18 +0100 |
commit | 0ac0a20823b92bf2bd39aa83c59c247b41ba3e44 (patch) | |
tree | b2f9b07ed8cd10abe80df85b6f004b2ce572e876 | |
parent | fe8187b80c7b4fee6fd5dfb0d68891230ae59dcb (diff) |
knfsd: Fix race that can disable NFS server.
This is a long standing bug that seems to have only recently become
apparent, presumably due to increasing use of NFS over TCP - many
distros seem to be making it the default.
The SK_CONN bit gets set when a listening socket may be ready
for an accept, just as SK_DATA is set when data may be available.
It is entirely possible for svc_tcp_accept to be called with neither
of these set. It doesn't happen often but there is a small race in
svc_sock_enqueue as SK_CONN and SK_DATA are tested outside the
spin_lock. They could be cleared immediately after the test and
before the lock is gained.
This normally shouldn't be a problem. The sockets are non-blocking so
trying to read() or accept() when ther is nothing to do is not a problem.
However: svc_tcp_recvfrom makes the decision "Should I accept() or
should I read()" based on whether SK_CONN is set or not. This usually
works but is not safe. The decision should be based on whether it is
a TCP_LISTEN socket or a TCP_CONNECTED socket.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
-rw-r--r-- | net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c index 50580620e89..b142e8c2cd2 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c @@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) return 0; } - if (test_bit(SK_CONN, &svsk->sk_flags)) { + if (svsk->sk_sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) { svc_tcp_accept(svsk); svc_sock_received(svsk); return 0; |