linux/scripts/generate_rust_analyzer.py, branch rpi-mipi

scripts: generate_rust_analyzer: Add ffi crate

2025-04-25T08:48:04Z

commit 05a2b0011c4b6cbbc9b577f6abebe4e9333b0cf6 upstream. Commit d072acda4862 ("rust: use custom FFI integer types") did not update rust-analyzer to include the new crate. To enable rust-analyzer support for these custom ffi types, add the `ffi` crate as a dependency to the `bindings`, `uapi` and `kernel` crates, which all directly depend on it. Fixes: d072acda4862 ("rust: use custom FFI integer types") Signed-off-by: Lukas Fischer Reviewed-by: Tamir Duberstein Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250404125150.85783-2-kernel@o1oo11oo.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

scripts: generate_rust_analyzer: add uapi crate

2025-03-22T19:54:27Z

[ Upstream commit a1eb95d6b5f4cf5cc7b081e85e374d1dd98a213b ] Commit 4e1746656839 ("rust: uapi: Add UAPI crate") did not update rust-analyzer to include the new crate. Add the missing definition to improve the developer experience. Fixes: 4e1746656839 ("rust: uapi: Add UAPI crate") Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210-rust-analyzer-bindings-include-v2-2-23dff845edc3@gmail.com [ Slightly reworded title. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

scripts: generate_rust_analyzer: add missing include_dirs

2025-03-22T19:54:27Z

[ Upstream commit d1f928052439cad028438a8b8b34c1f01bc06068 ] Commit 8c4555ccc55c ("scripts: add `generate_rust_analyzer.py`") specified OBJTREE for the bindings crate, and `source.include_dirs` for the kernel crate, likely in an attempt to support out-of-source builds for those crates where the generated files reside in `objtree` rather than `srctree`. This was insufficient because both bits of configuration are required for each crate; the result is that rust-analyzer is unable to resolve generated files for either crate in an out-of-source build. [ Originally we were not using `OBJTREE` in the `kernel` crate, but we did pass the variable anyway, so conceptually it could have been there since then. Regarding `include_dirs`, it started in `kernel` before being in mainline because we included the bindings directly there (i.e. there was no `bindings` crate). However, when that crate got created, we moved the `OBJTREE` there but not the `include_dirs`. Nowadays, though, we happen to need the `include_dirs` also in the `kernel` crate for `generated_arch_static_branch_asm.rs` which was not there back then -- Tamir confirms it is indeed required for that reason. - Miguel ] Add the missing bits to improve the developer experience. Fixes: 8c4555ccc55c ("scripts: add `generate_rust_analyzer.py`") Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210-rust-analyzer-bindings-include-v2-1-23dff845edc3@gmail.com [ Slightly reworded title. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

scripts: generate_rust_analyzer: add missing macros deps

2025-03-22T19:54:27Z

[ Upstream commit 2e0f91aba507a3cb59f7a12fc3ea2b7d4d6675b7 ] The macros crate has depended on std and proc_macro since its introduction in commit 1fbde52bde73 ("rust: add `macros` crate"). These dependencies were omitted from commit 8c4555ccc55c ("scripts: add `generate_rust_analyzer.py`") resulting in missing go-to-definition and autocomplete, and false-positive warnings emitted from rust-analyzer such as: [{ "resource": "/Users/tamird/src/linux/rust/macros/module.rs", "owner": "_generated_diagnostic_collection_name_#1", "code": { "value": "non_snake_case", "target": { "$mid": 1, "path": "/rustc/", "scheme": "https", "authority": "doc.rust-lang.org", "query": "search=non_snake_case" } }, "severity": 4, "message": "Variable `None` should have snake_case name, e.g. `none`", "source": "rust-analyzer", "startLineNumber": 123, "startColumn": 17, "endLineNumber": 123, "endColumn": 21 }] Add the missing dependencies to improve the developer experience. [ Fiona had a different approach (thanks!) at: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20241205115438.234221-1-me@kloenk.dev/ But Tamir and Fiona agreed to this one. - Miguel ] Fixes: 8c4555ccc55c ("scripts: add `generate_rust_analyzer.py`") Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens Diagnosed-by: Chayim Refael Friedman Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/17759#issuecomment-2646328275 Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210-rust-analyzer-macros-core-dep-v3-1-45eb4836f218@gmail.com [ Removed `return`. Changed tag name. Added Link. Slightly reworded. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

kbuild: rust: remove the `alloc` crate and `GlobalAlloc`

2025-03-13T12:01:47Z

commit 392e34b6bc22077ef63abf62387ea3e9f39418c1 upstream. Now that we have our own `Allocator`, `Box` and `Vec` types we can remove Rust's `alloc` crate and the `new_uninit` unstable feature. Also remove `Kmalloc`'s `GlobalAlloc` implementation -- we can't remove this in a separate patch, since the `alloc` crate requires a `#[global_allocator]` to set, that implements `GlobalAlloc`. Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241004154149.93856-29-dakr@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rust: Support latest version of `rust-analyzer`

2024-08-06T23:16:52Z

Sets the `sysroot` field in rust-project.json which is now needed in newer versions of rust-analyzer instead of the `sysroot_src` field. Till [1] `rust-analyzer` used to guess the `sysroot` based on the `sysroot_src` at [2]. Now `sysroot` is a required parameter for a `rust-project.json` file. It is required because `rust-analyzer` need it to find the proc-macro server [3]. In the current version of `rust-analyzer` the `sysroot_src` is only used to include the inbuilt library crates (std, core, alloc, etc) [4]. Since we already specify the core library to be included in the `rust-project.json` we don't need to define the `sysroot_src`. Code editors like VS Code try to use the latest version of rust-analyzer (which is updated every week) instead of the version of rust-analyzer that comes with the rustup toolchain (which is updated every six weeks along with the rust version). Without this change `rust-analyzer` is breaking for anyone using VS Code. As they are getting the latest version of `rust-analyzer` with the changes made in [1]. `rust-analyzer` will also start breaking for other developers as they update their rust version (assuming that also updates the rust-analyzer version on their system). This patch should work with every setup as there is no more guess work being done by `rust-analyzer`. [ Lukas, who leads the rust-analyzer team, says: `sysroot_src` is required now if you want to have the sysroot source libraries be loaded. I think we used to infer it as `{sysroot}/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library` before when only the `sysroot` field was given but that was since changed to make it possible in having a sysroot without the standard library sources (that is only have the binaries available). So if you want the library sources to be loaded by rust-analyzer you will have to set that field as well now. - Miguel ] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/17287 [1] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/blob/f372a8a1176ff8dd5f45ab2ddd45f3530db0374f/crates/project-model/src/workspace.rs#L367-L374 [2] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/blob/eeb192b79aeac47b40add66347022af17a74fbaf/crates/project-model/src/sysroot.rs#L180-L192 [3] Link: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3AVeykril%2Frust-analyzer%20src_root()&type=code [4] Tested-by: Dirk Behme Signed-off-by: Sarthak Singh Link: https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/291565-Help/topic/How.20to.20rust-analyzer.20correctly.20working Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240724172713.899399-1-sarthak.singh99@gmail.com [ Formatted comment, fixed typo and removed spurious empty line. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda

kbuild: use the upstream `alloc` crate

2024-04-16T20:03:14Z

Switch away from our fork of the `alloc` crate. We remove it altogether in the next commit. Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328013603.206764-4-wedsonaf@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda

scripts: generate_rust_analyzer: provide `cfg`s for `core` and `alloc`

2023-08-20T20:54:32Z

Both `core` and `alloc` have their `cfgs` (such as `no_rc`) missing in `rust-project.json`. To remedy this, pass the flags to `generate_rust_analyzer.py` for them to be added to a dictionary where each key corresponds to a crate and each value to a list of `cfg`s. The dictionary is then used to pass the `cfg`s to each crate in the generated file (for `core` and `alloc` only). Signed-off-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230804171448.54976-1-yakoyoku@gmail.com [ Removed `Suggested-by` as discussed in mailing list. ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda

scripts: `make rust-analyzer` for out-of-tree modules

2023-08-07T09:33:34Z

Adds support for out-of-tree rust modules to use the `rust-analyzer` make target to generate the rust-project.json file. The change involves adding an optional parameter `external_src` to the `generate_rust_analyzer.py` which expects the path to the out-of-tree module's source directory. When this parameter is passed, I have chosen not to add the non-core modules (samples and drivers) into the result since these are not expected to be used in third party modules. Related changes are also made to the Makefile and rust/Makefile allowing the `rust-analyzer` target to be used for out-of-tree modules as well. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/pull/914 Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/rust-out-of-tree-module/pull/2 Signed-off-by: Vinay Varma Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230411091714.130525-1-varmavinaym@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda

scripts: generate_rust_analyzer: Handle sub-modules with no Makefile

2023-04-06T22:53:34Z

More complex drivers might want to use modules to organize their Rust code, but those module folders do not need a Makefile. generate_rust_analyzer.py currently crashes on those. Fix it so that a missing Makefile is silently ignored. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/pull/883 Signed-off-by: Asahi Lina Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda