linux/fs/proc, branch v2.6.32.47

deal with races in /proc/*/{syscall,stack,personality}

2011-11-07T20:32:46Z

commit a9712bc12c40c172e393f85a9b2ba8db4bf59509 upstream. All of those are rw-r--r-- and all are broken for suid - if you open a file before the target does suid-root exec, you'll be still able to access it. For personality it's not a big deal, but for syscall and stack it's a real problem. Fix: check that task is tracable for you at the time of read(). Signed-off-by: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

kcore: fix test for end of list

2011-11-07T20:32:44Z

commit 4fd2c20d964a8fb9861045f1022475c9d200d684 upstream. "m" is never NULL here. We need a different test for the end of list condition. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Acked-by: WANG Cong Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Cc: Leonardo Chiquitto Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

proc: restrict access to /proc/PID/io

2011-08-08T17:23:19Z

commit 1d1221f375c94ef961ba8574ac4f85c8870ddd51 upstream. /proc/PID/io may be used for gathering private information. E.g. for openssh and vsftpd daemons wchars/rchars may be used to learn the precise password length. Restrict it to processes being able to ptrace the target process. ptrace_may_access() is needed to prevent keeping open file descriptor of "io" file, executing setuid binary and gathering io information of the setuid'ed process. Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

proc: do proper range check on readdir offset

2011-04-22T15:44:26Z

commit d8bdc59f215e62098bc5b4256fd9928bf27053a1 upstream. Rather than pass in some random truncated offset to the pid-related functions, check that the offset is in range up-front. This is just cleanup, the previous commit fixed the real problem. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

proc: protect mm start_code/end_code in /proc/pid/stat

2011-03-27T18:30:37Z

commit 5883f57ca0008ffc93e09cbb9847a1928e50c6f3 upstream. While mm->start_stack was protected from cross-uid viewing (commit f83ce3e6b02d5 ("proc: avoid information leaks to non-privileged processes")), the start_code and end_code values were not. This would allow the text location of a PIE binary to leak, defeating ASLR. Note that the value "1" is used instead of "0" for a protected value since "ps", "killall", and likely other readers of /proc/pid/stat, take start_code of "0" to mean a kernel thread and will misbehave. Thanks to Brad Spengler for pointing this out. Addresses CVE-2011-0726 Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Cc: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: David Howells Cc: Eugene Teo Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Brad Spengler Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

procfs: fix /proc//maps heap check

2011-03-27T18:30:36Z

commit 0db0c01b53a1a421513f91573241aabafb87802a upstream. The current code fails to print the "[heap]" marking if the heap is split into multiple mappings. Fix the check so that the marking is displayed in all possible cases: 1. vma matches exactly the heap 2. the heap vma is merged e.g. with bss 3. the heap vma is splitted e.g. due to locked pages Test cases. In all cases, the process should have mapping(s) with [heap] marking: (1) vma matches exactly the heap #include #include #include int main (void) { if (sbrk(4096) != (void *)-1) { printf("check /proc/%d/maps\n", (int)getpid()); while (1) sleep(1); } return 0; } # ./test1 check /proc/553/maps [1] + Stopped ./test1 # cat /proc/553/maps | head -4 00008000-00009000 r-xp 00000000 01:00 3113640 /test1 00010000-00011000 rw-p 00000000 01:00 3113640 /test1 00011000-00012000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [heap] 4006f000-40070000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 (2) the heap vma is merged #include #include #include char foo[4096] = "foo"; char bar[4096]; int main (void) { if (sbrk(4096) != (void *)-1) { printf("check /proc/%d/maps\n", (int)getpid()); while (1) sleep(1); } return 0; } # ./test2 check /proc/556/maps [2] + Stopped ./test2 # cat /proc/556/maps | head -4 00008000-00009000 r-xp 00000000 01:00 3116312 /test2 00010000-00012000 rw-p 00000000 01:00 3116312 /test2 00012000-00014000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [heap] 4004a000-4004b000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 (3) the heap vma is splitted (this fails without the patch) #include #include #include #include int main (void) { if ((sbrk(4096) != (void *)-1) && !mlockall(MCL_FUTURE) && (sbrk(4096) != (void *)-1)) { printf("check /proc/%d/maps\n", (int)getpid()); while (1) sleep(1); } return 0; } # ./test3 check /proc/559/maps [1] + Stopped ./test3 # cat /proc/559/maps|head -4 00008000-00009000 r-xp 00000000 01:00 3119108 /test3 00010000-00011000 rw-p 00000000 01:00 3119108 /test3 00011000-00012000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [heap] 00012000-00013000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [heap] It looks like the bug has been there forever, and since it only results in some information missing from a procfile, it does not fulfil the -stable "critical issue" criteria. Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

s390: remove task_show_regs

2011-03-02T14:46:49Z

commit 261cd298a8c363d7985e3482946edb4bfedacf98 upstream. task_show_regs used to be a debugging aid in the early bringup days of Linux on s390. /proc//status is a world readable file, it is not a good idea to show the registers of a process. The only correct fix is to remove task_show_regs. Reported-by: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

CRED: Fix get_task_cred() and task_state() to not resurrect dead credentials

2011-03-02T14:46:37Z

commit de09a9771a5346029f4d11e4ac886be7f9bfdd75 upstream. It's possible for get_task_cred() as it currently stands to 'corrupt' a set of credentials by incrementing their usage count after their replacement by the task being accessed. What happens is that get_task_cred() can race with commit_creds(): TASK_1 TASK_2 RCU_CLEANER -->get_task_cred(TASK_2) rcu_read_lock() __cred = __task_cred(TASK_2) -->commit_creds() old_cred = TASK_2->real_cred TASK_2->real_cred = ... put_cred(old_cred) call_rcu(old_cred) [__cred->usage == 0] get_cred(__cred) [__cred->usage == 1] rcu_read_unlock() -->put_cred_rcu() [__cred->usage == 1] panic() However, since a tasks credentials are generally not changed very often, we can reasonably make use of a loop involving reading the creds pointer and using atomic_inc_not_zero() to attempt to increment it if it hasn't already hit zero. If successful, we can safely return the credentials in the knowledge that, even if the task we're accessing has released them, they haven't gone to the RCU cleanup code. We then change task_state() in procfs to use get_task_cred() rather than calling get_cred() on the result of __task_cred(), as that suffers from the same problem. Without this change, a BUG_ON in __put_cred() or in put_cred_rcu() can be tripped when it is noticed that the usage count is not zero as it ought to be, for example: kernel BUG at kernel/cred.c:168! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP last sysfs file: /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run CPU 0 Pid: 2436, comm: master Not tainted 2.6.33.3-85.fc13.x86_64 #1 0HR330/OptiPlex 745 RIP: 0010:[] [] __put_cred+0xc/0x45 RSP: 0018:ffff88019e7e9eb8 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff880161514480 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: ffff880140c690c0 RDI: ffff880140c690c0 RBP: ffff88019e7e9eb8 R08: 00000000000000d0 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000040 R12: ffff880140c690c0 R13: ffff88019e77aea0 R14: 00007fff336b0a5c R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 00007f12f50d97c0(0000) GS:ffff880007400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f8f461bc000 CR3: 00000001b26ce000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Process master (pid: 2436, threadinfo ffff88019e7e8000, task ffff88019e77aea0) Stack: ffff88019e7e9ec8 ffffffff810698cd ffff88019e7e9ef8 ffffffff81069b45 <0> ffff880161514180 ffff880161514480 ffff880161514180 0000000000000000 <0> ffff88019e7e9f28 ffffffff8106aace 0000000000000001 0000000000000246 Call Trace: [] put_cred+0x13/0x15 [] commit_creds+0x16b/0x175 [] set_current_groups+0x47/0x4e [] sys_setgroups+0xf6/0x105 [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Code: 48 8d 71 ff e8 7e 4e 15 00 85 c0 78 0b 8b 75 ec 48 89 df e8 ef 4a 15 00 48 83 c4 18 5b c9 c3 55 8b 07 8b 07 48 89 e5 85 c0 74 04 <0f> 0b eb fe 65 48 8b 04 25 00 cc 00 00 48 3b b8 58 04 00 00 75 RIP [] __put_cred+0xc/0x45 RSP ---[ end trace df391256a100ebdd ]--- Signed-off-by: David Howells Acked-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: Move vma_stack_continue into mm.h

2010-10-29T04:44:18Z

commit 39aa3cb3e8250db9188a6f1e3fb62ffa1a717678 upstream. So it can be used by all that need to check for that. Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: fix up some user-visible effects of the stack guard page

2010-08-20T18:34:24Z

commit d7824370e26325c881b665350ce64fb0a4fde24a upstream. This commit makes the stack guard page somewhat less visible to user space. It does this by: - not showing the guard page in /proc//maps It looks like lvm-tools will actually read /proc/self/maps to figure out where all its mappings are, and effectively do a specialized "mlockall()" in user space. By not showing the guard page as part of the mapping (by just adding PAGE_SIZE to the start for grows-up pages), lvm-tools ends up not being aware of it. - by also teaching the _real_ mlock() functionality not to try to lock the guard page. That would just expand the mapping down to create a new guard page, so there really is no point in trying to lock it in place. It would perhaps be nice to show the guard page specially in /proc//maps (or at least mark grow-down segments some way), but let's not open ourselves up to more breakage by user space from programs that depends on the exact deails of the 'maps' file. Special thanks to Henrique de Moraes Holschuh for diving into lvm-tools source code to see what was going on with the whole new warning. Reported-and-tested-by: François Valenduc Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman