aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/TestingGuide.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/TestingGuide.rst')
-rw-r--r--docs/TestingGuide.rst227
1 files changed, 79 insertions, 148 deletions
diff --git a/docs/TestingGuide.rst b/docs/TestingGuide.rst
index 329003f089..f66cae1d14 100644
--- a/docs/TestingGuide.rst
+++ b/docs/TestingGuide.rst
@@ -46,23 +46,15 @@ Regression tests
----------------
The regression tests are small pieces of code that test a specific
-feature of LLVM or trigger a specific bug in LLVM. They are usually
-written in LLVM assembly language, but can be written in other languages
-if the test targets a particular language front end (and the appropriate
-``--with-llvmgcc`` options were used at ``configure`` time of the
-``llvm`` module). These tests are driven by the 'lit' testing tool,
-which is part of LLVM.
-
-These code fragments are not complete programs. The code generated from
-them is never executed to determine correct behavior.
-
-These code fragment tests are located in the ``llvm/test`` directory.
+feature of LLVM or trigger a specific bug in LLVM. The language they are
+written in depends on the part of LLVM being tested. These tests are driven by
+the :doc:`Lit <CommandGuide/lit>` testing tool (which is part of LLVM), and
+are located in the ``llvm/test`` directory.
Typically when a bug is found in LLVM, a regression test containing just
enough code to reproduce the problem should be written and placed
-somewhere underneath this directory. In most cases, this will be a small
-piece of LLVM assembly language code, often distilled from an actual
-application or benchmark.
+somewhere underneath this directory. For example, it can be a small
+piece of LLVM IR distilled from an actual application or benchmark.
``test-suite``
--------------
@@ -100,8 +92,8 @@ Quick start
The tests are located in two separate Subversion modules. The
regressions tests are in the main "llvm" module under the directory
-``llvm/test`` (so you get these tests for free with the main llvm tree).
-Use "make check-all" to run the regression tests after building LLVM.
+``llvm/test`` (so you get these tests for free with the main LLVM tree).
+Use ``make check-all`` to run the regression tests after building LLVM.
The more comprehensive test suite that includes whole programs in C and C++
is in the ``test-suite`` module. See :ref:`test-suite Quickstart
@@ -110,38 +102,37 @@ is in the ``test-suite`` module. See :ref:`test-suite Quickstart
Regression tests
----------------
-To run all of the LLVM regression tests, use master Makefile in the
-``llvm/test`` directory:
+To run all of the LLVM regression tests, use the master Makefile in the
+``llvm/test`` directory. LLVM Makefiles require GNU Make (read the :doc:`LLVM
+Makefile Guide <MakefileGuide>` for more details):
.. code-block:: bash
- % gmake -C llvm/test
+ % make -C llvm/test
-or
+or:
.. code-block:: bash
- % gmake check
+ % make check
If you have `Clang <http://clang.llvm.org/>`_ checked out and built, you
can run the LLVM and Clang tests simultaneously using:
-or
-
.. code-block:: bash
- % gmake check-all
+ % make check-all
To run the tests with Valgrind (Memcheck by default), just append
``VG=1`` to the commands above, e.g.:
.. code-block:: bash
- % gmake check VG=1
+ % make check VG=1
-To run individual tests or subsets of tests, you can use the 'llvm-lit'
+To run individual tests or subsets of tests, you can use the ``llvm-lit``
script which is built as part of LLVM. For example, to run the
-'Integer/BitPacked.ll' test by itself you can run:
+``Integer/BitPacked.ll`` test by itself you can run:
.. code-block:: bash
@@ -153,8 +144,8 @@ or to run all of the ARM CodeGen tests:
% llvm-lit ~/llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM
-For more information on using the 'lit' tool, see 'llvm-lit --help' or
-the 'lit' man page.
+For more information on using the :program:`lit` tool, see ``llvm-lit --help``
+or the :doc:`lit man page <CommandGuide/lit>`.
Debugging Information tests
---------------------------
@@ -172,36 +163,25 @@ These tests are already set up to run as part of clang regression tests.
Regression test structure
=========================
-The LLVM regression tests are driven by 'lit' and are located in the
+The LLVM regression tests are driven by :program:`lit` and are located in the
``llvm/test`` directory.
This directory contains a large array of small tests that exercise
various features of LLVM and to ensure that regressions do not occur.
The directory is broken into several sub-directories, each focused on a
-particular area of LLVM. A few of the important ones are:
-
-- ``Analysis``: checks Analysis passes.
-- ``Archive``: checks the Archive library.
-- ``Assembler``: checks Assembly reader/writer functionality.
-- ``Bitcode``: checks Bitcode reader/writer functionality.
-- ``CodeGen``: checks code generation and each target.
-- ``Features``: checks various features of the LLVM language.
-- ``Linker``: tests bitcode linking.
-- ``Transforms``: tests each of the scalar, IPO, and utility transforms
- to ensure they make the right transformations.
-- ``Verifier``: tests the IR verifier.
+particular area of LLVM.
Writing new regression tests
----------------------------
The regression test structure is very simple, but does require some
information to be set. This information is gathered via ``configure``
-and is written to a file, ``lit.site.cfg`` in ``llvm/test``. The
-``llvm/test`` Makefile does this work for you.
+and is written to a file, ``test/lit.site.cfg`` in the build directory.
+The ``llvm/test`` Makefile does this work for you.
In order for the regression tests to work, each directory of tests must
-have a ``lit.local.cfg`` file. Lit looks for this file to determine how
-to run the tests. This file is just Python code and thus is very
+have a ``lit.local.cfg`` file. :program:`lit` looks for this file to determine
+how to run the tests. This file is just Python code and thus is very
flexible, but we've standardized it for the LLVM regression tests. If
you're adding a directory of tests, just copy ``lit.local.cfg`` from
another directory to get running. The standard ``lit.local.cfg`` simply
@@ -209,28 +189,24 @@ specifies which files to look in for tests. Any directory that contains
only directories does not need the ``lit.local.cfg`` file. Read the :doc:`Lit
documentation <CommandGuide/lit>` for more information.
-The ``llvm-runtests`` function looks at each file that is passed to it
-and gathers any lines together that match "RUN:". These are the "RUN"
-lines that specify how the test is to be run. So, each test script must
-contain RUN lines if it is to do anything. If there are no RUN lines,
-the ``llvm-runtests`` function will issue an error and the test will
-fail.
+Each test file must contain lines starting with "RUN:" that tell :program:`lit`
+how to run it. If there are no RUN lines, :program:`lit` will issue an error
+while running a test.
RUN lines are specified in the comments of the test program using the
keyword ``RUN`` followed by a colon, and lastly the command (pipeline)
-to execute. Together, these lines form the "script" that
-``llvm-runtests`` executes to run the test case. The syntax of the RUN
-lines is similar to a shell's syntax for pipelines including I/O
-redirection and variable substitution. However, even though these lines
-may *look* like a shell script, they are not. RUN lines are interpreted
-directly by the Tcl ``exec`` command. They are never executed by a
-shell. Consequently the syntax differs from normal shell script syntax
-in a few ways. You can specify as many RUN lines as needed.
-
-lit performs substitution on each RUN line to replace LLVM tool names
+to execute. Together, these lines form the "script" that :program:`lit`
+executes to run the test case. The syntax of the RUN lines is similar to a
+shell's syntax for pipelines including I/O redirection and variable
+substitution. However, even though these lines may *look* like a shell
+script, they are not. RUN lines are interpreted by :program:`lit`.
+Consequently, the syntax differs from shell in a few ways. You can specify
+as many RUN lines as needed.
+
+:program:`lit` performs substitution on each RUN line to replace LLVM tool names
with the full paths to the executable built for each tool (in
-$(LLVM\_OBJ\_ROOT)/$(BuildMode)/bin). This ensures that lit does not
-invoke any stray LLVM tools in the user's path during testing.
+``$(LLVM_OBJ_ROOT)/$(BuildMode)/bin)``. This ensures that :program:`lit` does
+not invoke any stray LLVM tools in the user's path during testing.
Each RUN line is executed on its own, distinct from other lines unless
its last character is ``\``. This continuation character causes the RUN
@@ -238,8 +214,8 @@ line to be concatenated with the next one. In this way you can build up
long pipelines of commands without making huge line lengths. The lines
ending in ``\`` are concatenated until a RUN line that doesn't end in
``\`` is found. This concatenated set of RUN lines then constitutes one
-execution. Tcl will substitute variables and arrange for the pipeline to
-be executed. If any process in the pipeline fails, the entire line (and
+execution. :program:`lit` will substitute variables and arrange for the pipeline
+to be executed. If any process in the pipeline fails, the entire line (and
test case) fails too.
Below is an example of legal RUN lines in a ``.ll`` file:
@@ -250,103 +226,65 @@ Below is an example of legal RUN lines in a ``.ll`` file:
; RUN: llvm-dis < %s.bc-13 > %t2
; RUN: diff %t1 %t2
-As with a Unix shell, the RUN: lines permit pipelines and I/O
+As with a Unix shell, the RUN lines permit pipelines and I/O
redirection to be used. However, the usage is slightly different than
-for Bash. To check what's legal, see the documentation for the `Tcl
-exec <http://www.tcl.tk/man/tcl8.5/TclCmd/exec.htm#M2>`_ command and the
-`tutorial <http://www.tcl.tk/man/tcl8.5/tutorial/Tcl26.html>`_. The
-major differences are:
-
-- You can't do ``2>&1``. That will cause Tcl to write to a file named
- ``&1``. Usually this is done to get stderr to go through a pipe. You
- can do that in tcl with ``|&`` so replace this idiom:
+for Bash. In general, it's useful to read the code of other tests to figure out
+what you can use in yours. The major differences are:
+
+- You can't do ``2>&1``. That will cause :program:`lit` to write to a file
+ named ``&1``. Usually this is done to get stderr to go through a pipe. You
+ can do that with ``|&`` so replace this idiom:
``... 2>&1 | grep`` with ``... |& grep``
- You can only redirect to a file, not to another descriptor and not
from a here document.
-- tcl supports redirecting to open files with the @ syntax but you
- shouldn't use that here.
There are some quoting rules that you must pay attention to when writing
-your RUN lines. In general nothing needs to be quoted. Tcl won't strip
-off any quote characters so they will get passed to the invoked program.
+your RUN lines. In general nothing needs to be quoted. :program:`lit` won't
+strip off any quote characters so they will get passed to the invoked program.
For example:
.. code-block:: bash
... | grep 'find this string'
-This will fail because the ' characters are passed to grep. This would
-instruction grep to look for ``'find`` in the files ``this`` and
-``string'``. To avoid this use curly braces to tell Tcl that it should
-treat everything enclosed as one value. So our example would become:
+This will fail because the ``'`` characters are passed to ``grep``. This would
+make ``grep`` to look for ``'find`` in the files ``this`` and
+``string'``. To avoid this use curly braces to tell :program:`lit` that it
+should treat everything enclosed as one value. So our example would become:
.. code-block:: bash
... | grep {find this string}
-Additionally, the characters ``[`` and ``]`` are treated specially by
-Tcl. They tell Tcl to interpret the content as a command to execute.
-Since these characters are often used in regular expressions this can
-have disastrous results and cause the entire test run in a directory to
-fail. For example, a common idiom is to look for some basicblock number:
-
-.. code-block:: bash
-
- ... | grep bb[2-8]
-
-This, however, will cause Tcl to fail because its going to try to
-execute a program named "2-8". Instead, what you want is this:
-
-.. code-block:: bash
-
- ... | grep {bb\[2-8\]}
-
-Finally, if you need to pass the ``\`` character down to a program, then
-it must be doubled. This is another Tcl special character. So, suppose
-you had:
-
-.. code-block:: bash
-
- ... | grep 'i32\*'
-
-This will fail to match what you want (a pointer to i32). First, the
-``'`` do not get stripped off. Second, the ``\`` gets stripped off by
-Tcl so what grep sees is: ``'i32*'``. That's not likely to match
-anything. To resolve this you must use ``\\`` and the ``{}``, like this:
-
-.. code-block:: bash
-
- ... | grep {i32\\*}
-
-If your system includes GNU ``grep``, make sure that ``GREP_OPTIONS`` is
-not set in your environment. Otherwise, you may get invalid results
-(both false positives and false negatives).
+In general, you should strive to keep your RUN lines as simple as possible,
+using them only to run tools that generate the output you can then examine. The
+recommended way to examine output to figure out if the test passes it using the
+:doc:`FileCheck tool <CommandGuide/FileCheck>`. The usage of ``grep`` in RUN
+lines is discouraged.
The FileCheck utility
---------------------
-A powerful feature of the RUN: lines is that it allows any arbitrary
+A powerful feature of the RUN lines is that it allows any arbitrary
commands to be executed as part of the test harness. While standard
-(portable) unix tools like 'grep' work fine on run lines, as you see
-above, there are a lot of caveats due to interaction with Tcl syntax,
+(portable) unix tools like ``grep`` work fine on run lines, as you see
+above, there are a lot of caveats due to interaction with shell syntax,
and we want to make sure the run lines are portable to a wide range of
-systems. Another major problem is that grep is not very good at checking
+systems. Another major problem is that ``grep`` is not very good at checking
to verify that the output of a tools contains a series of different
-output in a specific order. The FileCheck tool was designed to help with
-these problems.
+output in a specific order. The :program:`FileCheck` tool was designed to
+help with these problems.
-FileCheck is designed to read a file to check from standard input, and the set
-of things to verify from a file specified as a command line argument.
-FileCheck is described in :doc:`the FileCheck man page
+:program:`FileCheck` is designed to read a file to check from standard input,
+and the set of things to verify from a file specified as a command line
+argument. :program:`FileCheck` is described in :doc:`the FileCheck man page
<CommandGuide/FileCheck>`.
Variables and substitutions
---------------------------
With a RUN line there are a number of substitutions that are permitted.
-In general, any Tcl variable that is available in the ``substitute``
-function (in ``test/lib/llvm.exp``) can be substituted into a RUN line.
-To make a substitution just write the variable's name preceded by a $.
+To make a substitution just write the variable's name preceded by a ``$``.
Additionally, for compatibility reasons with previous versions of the
test library, certain names can be accessed with an alternate syntax: a
% prefix. These alternates are deprecated and may go away in a future
@@ -357,15 +295,15 @@ parentheses.
``$test`` (``%s``)
The full path to the test case's source. This is suitable for passing on
- the command line as the input to an llvm tool.
+ the command line as the input to an LLVM tool.
``%(line)``, ``%(line+<number>)``, ``%(line-<number>)``
The number of the line where this variable is used, with an optional
- integer offset. This can be used in tests with multiple RUN: lines,
+ integer offset. This can be used in tests with multiple RUN lines,
which reference test file's line numbers.
``$srcdir``
- The source directory from where the "``make check``" was run.
+ The source directory from where the ``make check`` was run.
``objdir``
The object directory that corresponds to the ``$srcdir``.
@@ -398,23 +336,18 @@ parentheses.
``link`` (``%link``)
This full link command used to link LLVM executables. This has all the
- configured -I, -L and -l options.
+ configured ``-I``, ``-L`` and ``-l`` options.
``shlibext`` (``%shlibext``)
- The suffix for the host platforms share library (dll) files. This
+ The suffix for the host platforms shared library (DLL) files. This
includes the period as the first character.
-To add more variables, two things need to be changed. First, add a line
-in the ``test/Makefile`` that creates the ``site.exp`` file. This will
-"set" the variable as a global in the site.exp file. Second, in the
-``test/lib/llvm.exp`` file, in the substitute proc, add the variable
-name to the list of "global" declarations at the beginning of the proc.
-That's it, the variable can then be used in test scripts.
+To add more variables, look at ``test/lit.cfg``.
Other Features
--------------
-To make RUN line writing easier, there are several shell scripts located
+To make RUN line writing easier, there are several helper scripts and programs
in the ``llvm/test/Scripts`` directory. This directory is in the PATH
when running tests, so you can just call these scripts using their name.
For example:
@@ -428,9 +361,7 @@ For example:
purposefully ignoring the result code of the tool
``not``
This script runs its arguments and then inverts the result code from it.
- Zero result codes become 1. Non-zero result codes become 0. This is
- useful to invert the result of a grep. For example "not grep X" means
- succeed only if you don't find X in the input.
+ Zero result codes become 1. Non-zero result codes become 0.
Sometimes it is necessary to mark a test case as "expected fail" or
XFAIL. You can easily mark a test as XFAIL just by including ``XFAIL:``
@@ -450,7 +381,7 @@ line:
; XFAIL: darwin,sun
-To make the output more useful, the ``llvm_runtest`` function wil scan
+To make the output more useful, :program:`lit` will scan
the lines of the test case for ones that contain a pattern that matches
``PR[0-9]+``. This is the syntax for specifying a PR (Problem Report) number
that is related to the test case. The number after "PR" specifies the