diff options
author | Jim Grosbach <grosbach@apple.com> | 2013-05-01 00:25:27 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jim Grosbach <grosbach@apple.com> | 2013-05-01 00:25:27 +0000 |
commit | 10cc563bfe330cf4118b2f0db6706c244e77ebb3 (patch) | |
tree | 10bb99077f66c2aa389886f2f43633db0eeff196 /lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineVectorOps.cpp | |
parent | c147c1b994e1187cb471cdb7ee05f5f875eff4e0 (diff) |
Revert "InstCombine: Fold more shuffles of shuffles."
This reverts commit r180802
There's ongoing discussion about whether this is the right place to make
this transformation. Reverting for now while we figure it out.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@180834 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineVectorOps.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineVectorOps.cpp | 17 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineVectorOps.cpp b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineVectorOps.cpp index 56243059a6..de8a3acdbd 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineVectorOps.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineVectorOps.cpp @@ -614,16 +614,11 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitShuffleVectorInst(ShuffleVectorInst &SVI) { // we are absolutely afraid of producing a shuffle mask not in the input // program, because the code gen may not be smart enough to turn a merged // shuffle into two specific shuffles: it may produce worse code. As such, - // we only merge two shuffles if the result is a splat, one of the input - // input shuffle masks, or if there's only one input to the shuffle. - // In this case, merging the shuffles just removes one instruction, which - // we know is safe. This is good for things like + // we only merge two shuffles if the result is either a splat or one of the + // input shuffle masks. In this case, merging the shuffles just removes + // one instruction, which we know is safe. This is good for things like // turning: (splat(splat)) -> splat, or // merge(V[0..n], V[n+1..2n]) -> V[0..2n] - // - // FIXME: This is almost certainly far, far too conservative. We should - // have a better model. Perhaps a TargetTransformInfo hook to ask whether - // a shuffle is considered OK? ShuffleVectorInst* LHSShuffle = dyn_cast<ShuffleVectorInst>(LHS); ShuffleVectorInst* RHSShuffle = dyn_cast<ShuffleVectorInst>(RHS); if (LHSShuffle) @@ -748,10 +743,8 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitShuffleVectorInst(ShuffleVectorInst &SVI) { } // If the result mask is equal to one of the original shuffle masks, - // or is a splat, do the replacement. Similarly, if there is only one - // input vector, go ahead and do the folding. - if (isSplat || newMask == LHSMask || newMask == RHSMask || newMask == Mask || - isa<UndefValue>(RHS)) { + // or is a splat, do the replacement. + if (isSplat || newMask == LHSMask || newMask == RHSMask || newMask == Mask) { SmallVector<Constant*, 16> Elts; Type *Int32Ty = Type::getInt32Ty(SVI.getContext()); for (unsigned i = 0, e = newMask.size(); i != e; ++i) { |