diff options
author | Cameron Zwarich <zwarich@apple.com> | 2011-01-08 17:01:52 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Cameron Zwarich <zwarich@apple.com> | 2011-01-08 17:01:52 +0000 |
commit | 80f6a507d4e11ba066ad0e53e12ad25ad8cf07ba (patch) | |
tree | cb43916770bd152485052ddac344b01013b595a5 /lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp | |
parent | bea4626f93c830e31f82cc947df28fdae583cd09 (diff) |
Make more passes preserve dominators (or state that they preserve dominators if
they all ready do). This removes two dominator recomputations prior to isel,
which is a 1% improvement in total llc time for 403.gcc.
The only potentially suspect thing is making GCStrategy recompute dominators if
it used a custom lowering strategy.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123064 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp | 18 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp index 61dd7b1bc1..fcaee4208b 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #define DEBUG_TYPE "stack-protector" #include "llvm/CodeGen/Passes.h" +#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h" #include "llvm/Attributes.h" #include "llvm/Constants.h" #include "llvm/DerivedTypes.h" @@ -45,6 +46,8 @@ namespace { Function *F; Module *M; + DominatorTree* DT; + /// InsertStackProtectors - Insert code into the prologue and epilogue of /// the function. /// @@ -70,6 +73,10 @@ namespace { initializeStackProtectorPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()); } + virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { + AU.addPreserved<DominatorTree>(); + } + virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &Fn); }; } // end anonymous namespace @@ -85,6 +92,7 @@ FunctionPass *llvm::createStackProtectorPass(const TargetLowering *tli) { bool StackProtector::runOnFunction(Function &Fn) { F = &Fn; M = F->getParent(); + DT = getAnalysisIfAvailable<DominatorTree>(); if (!RequiresStackProtector()) return false; @@ -139,6 +147,7 @@ bool StackProtector::RequiresStackProtector() const { /// value. It calls __stack_chk_fail if they differ. bool StackProtector::InsertStackProtectors() { BasicBlock *FailBB = 0; // The basic block to jump to if check fails. + BasicBlock *FailBBDom = 0; // FailBB's dominator. AllocaInst *AI = 0; // Place on stack that stores the stack guard. Value *StackGuardVar = 0; // The stack guard variable. @@ -182,6 +191,8 @@ bool StackProtector::InsertStackProtectors() { // Create the basic block to jump to when the guard check fails. FailBB = CreateFailBB(); + if (DT) + FailBBDom = DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB) ? BB : 0; } // For each block with a return instruction, convert this: @@ -208,6 +219,10 @@ bool StackProtector::InsertStackProtectors() { // Split the basic block before the return instruction. BasicBlock *NewBB = BB->splitBasicBlock(RI, "SP_return"); + if (DT) { + DT->addNewBlock(NewBB, DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB) ? BB : 0); + FailBBDom = DT->findNearestCommonDominator(FailBBDom, BB); + } // Remove default branch instruction to the new BB. BB->getTerminator()->eraseFromParent(); @@ -227,6 +242,9 @@ bool StackProtector::InsertStackProtectors() { // statements in the function. if (!FailBB) return false; + if (DT) + DT->addNewBlock(FailBB, FailBBDom); + return true; } |