Switch TargetTransformInfo from an immutable analysis pass that requires

a TargetMachine to construct (and thus isn't always available), to an
analysis group that supports layered implementations much like
AliasAnalysis does. This is a pretty massive change, with a few parts
that I was unable to easily separate (sorry), so I'll walk through it.

The first step of this conversion was to make TargetTransformInfo an
analysis group, and to sink the nonce implementations in
ScalarTargetTransformInfo and VectorTargetTranformInfo into
a NoTargetTransformInfo pass. This allows other passes to add a hard
requirement on TTI, and assume they will always get at least on
implementation.

The TargetTransformInfo analysis group leverages the delegation chaining
trick that AliasAnalysis uses, where the base class for the analysis
group delegates to the previous analysis *pass*, allowing all but tho
NoFoo analysis passes to only implement the parts of the interfaces they
support. It also introduces a new trick where each pass in the group
retains a pointer to the top-most pass that has been initialized. This
allows passes to implement one API in terms of another API and benefit
when some other pass above them in the stack has more precise results
for the second API.

The second step of this conversion is to create a pass that implements
the TargetTransformInfo analysis using the target-independent
abstractions in the code generator. This replaces the
ScalarTargetTransformImpl and VectorTargetTransformImpl classes in
lib/Target with a single pass in lib/CodeGen called
BasicTargetTransformInfo. This class actually provides most of the TTI
functionality, basing it upon the TargetLowering abstraction and other
information in the target independent code generator.

The third step of the conversion adds support to all TargetMachines to
register custom analysis passes. This allows building those passes with
access to TargetLowering or other target-specific classes, and it also
allows each target to customize the set of analysis passes desired in
the pass manager. The baseline LLVMTargetMachine implements this
interface to add the BasicTTI pass to the pass manager, and all of the
tools that want to support target-aware TTI passes call this routine on
whatever target machine they end up with to add the appropriate passes.

The fourth step of the conversion created target-specific TTI analysis
passes for the X86 and ARM backends. These passes contain the custom
logic that was previously in their extensions of the
ScalarTargetTransformInfo and VectorTargetTransformInfo interfaces.
I separated them into their own file, as now all of the interface bits
are private and they just expose a function to create the pass itself.
Then I extended these target machines to set up a custom set of analysis
passes, first adding BasicTTI as a fallback, and then adding their
customized TTI implementations.

The fourth step required logic that was shared between the target
independent layer and the specific targets to move to a different
interface, as they no longer derive from each other. As a consequence,
a helper functions were added to TargetLowering representing the common
logic needed both in the target implementation and the codegen
implementation of the TTI pass. While technically this is the only
change that could have been committed separately, it would have been
a nightmare to extract.

The final step of the conversion was just to delete all the old
boilerplate. This got rid of the ScalarTargetTransformInfo and
VectorTargetTransformInfo classes, all of the support in all of the
targets for producing instances of them, and all of the support in the
tools for manually constructing a pass based around them.

Now that TTI is a relatively normal analysis group, two things become
straightforward. First, we can sink it into lib/Analysis which is a more
natural layer for it to live. Second, clients of this interface can
depend on it *always* being available which will simplify their code and
behavior. These (and other) simplifications will follow in subsequent
commits, this one is clearly big enough.

Finally, I'm very aware that much of the comments and documentation
needs to be updated. As soon as I had this working, and plausibly well
commented, I wanted to get it committed and in front of the build bots.
I'll be doing a few passes over documentation later if it sticks.

Commits to update DragonEgg and Clang will be made presently.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171681 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 97 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
index f63e226ff9..77732e04a2 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
@@ -1099,6 +1099,103 @@ TargetLowering::isOffsetFoldingLegal(const GlobalAddressSDNode *GA) const {
 }
 
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//  TargetTransformInfo Helpers
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+int TargetLowering::InstructionOpcodeToISD(unsigned Opcode) const {
+  enum InstructionOpcodes {
+#define HANDLE_INST(NUM, OPCODE, CLASS) OPCODE = NUM,
+#define LAST_OTHER_INST(NUM) InstructionOpcodesCount = NUM
+#include "llvm/IR/Instruction.def"
+  };
+  switch (static_cast<InstructionOpcodes>(Opcode)) {
+  case Ret:            return 0;
+  case Br:             return 0;
+  case Switch:         return 0;
+  case IndirectBr:     return 0;
+  case Invoke:         return 0;
+  case Resume:         return 0;
+  case Unreachable:    return 0;
+  case Add:            return ISD::ADD;
+  case FAdd:           return ISD::FADD;
+  case Sub:            return ISD::SUB;
+  case FSub:           return ISD::FSUB;
+  case Mul:            return ISD::MUL;
+  case FMul:           return ISD::FMUL;
+  case UDiv:           return ISD::UDIV;
+  case SDiv:           return ISD::UDIV;
+  case FDiv:           return ISD::FDIV;
+  case URem:           return ISD::UREM;
+  case SRem:           return ISD::SREM;
+  case FRem:           return ISD::FREM;
+  case Shl:            return ISD::SHL;
+  case LShr:           return ISD::SRL;
+  case AShr:           return ISD::SRA;
+  case And:            return ISD::AND;
+  case Or:             return ISD::OR;
+  case Xor:            return ISD::XOR;
+  case Alloca:         return 0;
+  case Load:           return ISD::LOAD;
+  case Store:          return ISD::STORE;
+  case GetElementPtr:  return 0;
+  case Fence:          return 0;
+  case AtomicCmpXchg:  return 0;
+  case AtomicRMW:      return 0;
+  case Trunc:          return ISD::TRUNCATE;
+  case ZExt:           return ISD::ZERO_EXTEND;
+  case SExt:           return ISD::SIGN_EXTEND;
+  case FPToUI:         return ISD::FP_TO_UINT;
+  case FPToSI:         return ISD::FP_TO_SINT;
+  case UIToFP:         return ISD::UINT_TO_FP;
+  case SIToFP:         return ISD::SINT_TO_FP;
+  case FPTrunc:        return ISD::FP_ROUND;
+  case FPExt:          return ISD::FP_EXTEND;
+  case PtrToInt:       return ISD::BITCAST;
+  case IntToPtr:       return ISD::BITCAST;
+  case BitCast:        return ISD::BITCAST;
+  case ICmp:           return ISD::SETCC;
+  case FCmp:           return ISD::SETCC;
+  case PHI:            return 0;
+  case Call:           return 0;
+  case Select:         return ISD::SELECT;
+  case UserOp1:        return 0;
+  case UserOp2:        return 0;
+  case VAArg:          return 0;
+  case ExtractElement: return ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT;
+  case InsertElement:  return ISD::INSERT_VECTOR_ELT;
+  case ShuffleVector:  return ISD::VECTOR_SHUFFLE;
+  case ExtractValue:   return ISD::MERGE_VALUES;
+  case InsertValue:    return ISD::MERGE_VALUES;
+  case LandingPad:     return 0;
+  }
+
+  llvm_unreachable("Unknown instruction type encountered!");
+}
+
+std::pair<unsigned, MVT>
+TargetLowering::getTypeLegalizationCost(Type *Ty) const {
+  LLVMContext &C = Ty->getContext();
+  EVT MTy = getValueType(Ty);
+
+  unsigned Cost = 1;
+  // We keep legalizing the type until we find a legal kind. We assume that
+  // the only operation that costs anything is the split. After splitting
+  // we need to handle two types.
+  while (true) {
+    LegalizeKind LK = getTypeConversion(C, MTy);
+
+    if (LK.first == TypeLegal)
+      return std::make_pair(Cost, MTy.getSimpleVT());
+
+    if (LK.first == TypeSplitVector || LK.first == TypeExpandInteger)
+      Cost *= 2;
+
+    // Keep legalizing the type.
+    MTy = LK.second;
+  }
+}
+
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 //  Optimization Methods
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//