aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.expl.spec/p2.cpp
blob: 7b505186055041943f8130e5a31e703f41078521 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
// RUN: clang-cc -fsyntax-only -verify %s

// This test creates cases where implicit instantiations of various entities
// would cause a diagnostic, but provides expliict specializations for those
// entities that avoid the diagnostic. The specializations are alternately
// declarations and definitions, and the intent of this test is to verify
// that we allow specializations only in the appropriate namespaces (and
// nowhere else).
struct NonDefaultConstructible {
  NonDefaultConstructible(int);
};


// C++ [temp.expl.spec]p1:
//   An explicit specialization of any of the following:

//     -- function template
namespace N0 {
  template<typename T> void f0(T) { // expected-note{{here}}
    T t;
  }

  template<> void f0(NonDefaultConstructible) { }

  void test_f0(NonDefaultConstructible NDC) {
    f0(NDC);
  }
  
  template<> void f0(int);
  template<> void f0(long);
}

template<> void N0::f0(int) { } // okay

namespace N1 {
  template<> void N0::f0(long) { } // expected-error{{not in a namespace enclosing}}
}

template<> void N0::f0(double) { } // expected-error{{originally be declared}}

//     -- class template
namespace N0 {
  
template<typename T>
struct X0 { // expected-note 2{{here}}
  static T member;
  
  void f1(T t) {
    t = 17;
  }
  
  struct Inner : public T { };
  
  template<typename U>
  struct InnerTemplate : public T { };
  
  template<typename U>
  void ft1(T t, U u);
};

}

template<typename T> 
template<typename U>
void N0::X0<T>::ft1(T t, U u) {
  t = u;
}

template<typename T> T N0::X0<T>::member;

template<> struct N0::X0<void> { }; // expected-error{{originally}}
N0::X0<void> test_X0;

namespace N1 {
  template<> struct N0::X0<const void> { }; // expected-error{{originally}}
}

namespace N0 {
  template<> struct X0<volatile void>;
}

template<> struct N0::X0<volatile void> { };

//     -- member function of a class template
// FIXME: this should complain about the scope of f1, but we don't seem
// to recognize it as a specialization. Hrm?
template<> void N0::X0<void*>::f1(void *) { }

void test_spec(N0::X0<void*> xvp, void *vp) {
  xvp.f1(vp);
}

#if 0
// FIXME: update the remainder of this test to check for scopes properly.
//     -- static data member of a class template
template<> 
NonDefaultConstructible X0<NonDefaultConstructible>::member = 17;

NonDefaultConstructible &get_static_member() {
  return X0<NonDefaultConstructible>::member;
}

//    -- member class of a class template
template<>
struct X0<void*>::Inner { };

X0<void*>::Inner inner0;

//    -- member class template of a class template
template<>
template<>
struct X0<void*>::InnerTemplate<int> { };

X0<void*>::InnerTemplate<int> inner_template0;

//    -- member function template of a class template
template<>
template<>
void X0<void*>::ft1(void*, const void*) { }

void test_func_template(X0<void *> xvp, void *vp, const void *cvp) {
  xvp.ft1(vp, cvp);
}
#endif