From e4e68d45f89ff4899d30cbd196603d09b7fbc150 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:33:52 +0000
Subject: When overload resolution picks an implicitly-deleted special member
 function, provide a specialized diagnostic that indicates the kind of special
 member function (default constructor, copy assignment operator, etc.) and
 that it was implicitly deleted. Add a hook where we can provide more detailed
 information later.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@150611 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---
 test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp')

diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp
index 559c3013f7..f8ee76727e 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp
@@ -54,10 +54,9 @@ namespace ExceptionSpecification {
 // The same problem arises in delayed parsing of default arguments,
 // which clang does not yet support.
 namespace DefaultArgument {
-  // FIXME: this diagnostic is completely wrong.
-  struct Default { // expected-note {{explicitly marked deleted here}}
+  struct Default { // expected-note {{defined here}}
     struct T {
-      T(int = ExceptionIf<noexcept(Default())::f()); // expected-error {{call to deleted constructor}}
+      T(int = ExceptionIf<noexcept(Default())::f()); // expected-error {{call to implicitly-deleted default constructor}}
     } t;
   };
 }
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2