From 4fe95f99a2693f1145785ea5835ba6937e49c730 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Douglas Gregor Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 19:04:08 +0000 Subject: Don't generate any code for an explicit call to a trivial destructor. Now that parsing, semantic analysis, and (I think) code generation of pseudo-destructor expressions and explicit destructor calls works, update the example-dynarray.cpp test to destroy the objects it allocates and update the test to actually compile + link. The code seems correct, but the Clang-compiled version dies with a malloc error. Time to debug! git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@81025 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp') diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp index 802df06b25..cde6e89d66 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp @@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ llvm::Constant *CodeGenModule::GetAddrOfFunction(GlobalDecl GD, // If there was no specific requested type, just convert it now. if (!Ty) Ty = getTypes().ConvertType(GD.getDecl()->getType()); - return GetOrCreateLLVMFunction(getMangledName(GD.getDecl()), Ty, GD); + return GetOrCreateLLVMFunction(getMangledName(GD), Ty, GD); } /// CreateRuntimeFunction - Create a new runtime function with the specified -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258