aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/SemaCXX/scope-check.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2013-02-15When a statement is dropped from the AST because it was invalid, make sureArgyrios Kyrtzidis
we don't do the scope checks otherwise we are going to hit assertion checks since a label may not have been actually added. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@175281 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-10-31Correctly reject gotos in function-level try blocks. PR14225.Eli Friedman
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@167184 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-10-28Fix invalid jump scopes again. This time without trying to find out if anRafael Espindola
incomplete type has a destructor or not. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@166895 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-10-27Revert 166876 while I debug a bootstrap problem.Rafael Espindola
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@166878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-10-27Reapply 166855 with an early exit on null QualTypes.Rafael Espindola
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@166876 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-10-27Revert r166855. I can reproduce the bootstrap failure and have a testcaseRafael Espindola
to reduce. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@166863 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-10-27Fix cases where we were not producing an error when a computed goto couldRafael Espindola
jump over destructor calls. Fixes pr13812. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@166855 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-09-11Fix namespace nesting and remove windows line endings.Rafael Espindola
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@163620 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2011-12-15Modify how the -verify flag works. Currently, the verification string andRichard Trieu
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case: // expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}} will match the following error messages from Clang: candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2) candidate function has different number of parameters It will also match these other error messages: candidate function function has different number of parameters number of parameters This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup: 87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings 70 - wording updates to diagnostics 40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes) 35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:) 18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@146619 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2011-10-13Update all tests other than Driver/std.cpp to use -std=c++11 rather thanRichard Smith
-std=c++0x. Patch by Ahmed Charles! git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@141900 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2011-09-16In Microsoft mode, warn if an indirect goto jump over a variable initialization.Francois Pichet
Also add a test case for the non Microsoft case because such test didn't exist. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@139971 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2011-07-29Make DiagnosticErrorTrap keep a count of the errors that occurred so multipleArgyrios Kyrtzidis
DiagnosticErrorTraps can be composed (e.g. a trap inside another trap). Fixes http://llvm.org/PR10462 & rdar://9852007. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@136447 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2011-04-22I concur with DPG here. This does indeed apply in 0x mode. Added testChandler Carruth
cases that demonstrates exactly why this does indeed apply in 0x mode. If isPOD is currently broken in 0x mode, we should fix that directly rather than papering over it here. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@130007 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-10-28Implement an indirect-goto optimization for goto *&&lbl and respect thisJohn McCall
in the scope checker. With that done, turn an indirect goto into a protected scope into a hard error; otherwise IR generation has to start worrying about declarations not dominating their scopes, as exemplified in PR8473. If this really affects anyone, I can probably adjust this to only hard-error on possible indirect gotos into VLA scopes rather than arbitrary scopes. But we'll see how people cope with the aggressive change on the marginal feature. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@117539 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-08-02Labels (and case statement) don't create independent scope parents for theJohn McCall
purposes of the jump checker. Also extend Ted's iteration fix to labels. Fixes PR7789. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@110082 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-08-01Don't consider all local variables in C++ to mandate scope-checking, justJohn McCall
those with initializers. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@109964 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-05-12When checking scopes for indirect goto, be more permissive (but still safe)John McCall
about the permitted scopes. Specifically: 1) Permit labels and gotos to appear after a prologue of variable initializations. 2) Permit indirect gotos to jump out of scopes that don't require cleanup. 3) Diagnose possible attempts to indirect-jump out of scopes that do require cleanup. This requires a substantial reinvention of the algorithm for checking indirect goto. The current algorithm is Omega(M*N), with M = the number of unique scopes being jumped from and N = the number of unique scopes being jumped to, with an additional factor that is probably (worst-case) linear in the depth of scopes. Thus the entire thing is likely cubic given some truly bizarre ill-formed code; on well-formed code the additional factor collapses to an amortized constant (when amortized over the entire function) and so the algorithm is quadratic. Even this requires every label to appear in its own scope, which would be very unusual for indirect-goto code (and extremely unlikely for well-formed code); it is far more likely that all labels will be in the same scope and so the algorithm becomes linear. For such a marginal feature, I am fairly happy with this result. (this is using JumpDiagnostic's definition of scope, where successive variables in a block appear in their own scope) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@103536 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8