aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2013-04-24[analyzer] Refactoring + explanatory comment.Anton Yartsev
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@180181 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-23[analyzer] Refactor BugReport::getLocation and ↵Anna Zaks
PathDiagnosticLocation::createEndOfPath for greater code reuse The 2 functions were computing the same location using different logic (each one had edge case bugs that the other one did not). Refactor them to rely on the same logic. The location of the warning reported in text/command line output format will now match that of the plist file. There is one change in the plist output as well. When reporting an error on a BinaryOperator, we use the location of the operator instead of the beginning of the BinaryOperator expression. This matches our output on command line and looks better in most cases. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@180165 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-22[analyzer] Treat reinterpret_cast like a base cast in certain cases.Jordan Rose
The analyzer represents all pointer-to-pointer bitcasts the same way, but this can be problematic if an implicit base cast gets layered on top of a manual base cast (performed with reinterpret_cast instead of static_cast). Fix this (and avoid a valid assertion) by looking through cast regions. Using reinterpret_cast this way is only valid if the base class is at the same offset as the derived class; this is checked by -Wreinterpret-base-class. In the interest of performance, the analyzer doesn't repeat this check anywhere; it will just silently do the wrong thing (use the wrong offsets for fields of the base class) if the user code is wrong. PR15394 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@180052 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-20C++1y: Allow aggregates to have default initializers.Richard Smith
Add a CXXDefaultInitExpr, analogous to CXXDefaultArgExpr, and use it both in CXXCtorInitializers and in InitListExprs to represent a default initializer. There's an additional complication here: because the default initializer can refer to the initialized object via its 'this' pointer, we need to make sure that 'this' points to the right thing within the evaluation. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179958 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-20[analyzer] Ensure BugReporterTracking works on regions with pointer arithmeticAnna Zaks
Introduce a new helper function, which computes the first symbolic region in the base region chain. The corresponding symbol has been used for assuming that a pointer is null. Now, it will also be used for checking if it is null. This ensures that we are tracking a null pointer correctly in the BugReporter. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179916 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-20[analyzer] Flip printPretty and printPrettyAsExpr as per suggestion from ↵Anna Zaks
Jordan (r179572) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179915 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-19[analyzer] Call proper callback for const regions escaped other then on call.Anton Yartsev
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179846 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-18[analyzer] Refine 'nil receiver' diagnostics to mention the name of the ↵Ted Kremenek
method not called. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179776 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-18[analyzer] "Force" LazyCompoundVals on bind when they are simple enough.Jordan Rose
The analyzer uses LazyCompoundVals to represent rvalues of aggregate types, most importantly structs and arrays. This allows us to efficiently copy around an entire struct, rather than doing a memberwise load every time a struct rvalue is encountered. This can also keep memory usage down by allowing several structs to "share" the same snapshotted bindings. However, /lookup/ through LazyCompoundVals can be expensive, especially since they can end up chaining back to the original value. While we try to reuse LazyCompoundVals whenever it's safe, and cache information about this transitivity, the fact is it's sometimes just not a good idea to perpetuate LazyCompoundVals -- the tradeoffs just aren't worth it. This commit changes RegionStore so that binding a LazyCompoundVal to struct will do a memberwise copy if the struct is simple enough. Today's definition of "simple enough" is "up to N scalar members" (see below), but that could easily be changed in the future. This is enough to bring the test case in PR15697 back down to a manageable analysis time (within 20% of its original time, in an unfair test where the new analyzer is not compiled with LTO). The actual value of "N" is controlled by a new -analyzer-config option, 'region-store-small-struct-limit'. It defaults to "2", meaning structs with zero, one, or two scalar members will be considered "simple enough" for this code path. It's worth noting that a more straightforward implementation would do this on load, not on bind, and make use of the structure we already have for this: CompoundVal. A long time ago, this was actually how RegionStore modeled aggregate-to-aggregate copies, but today it's only used for compound literals. Unfortunately, it seems that we've special-cased LazyCompoundVal in certain places (such as liveness checks) but failed to similarly special-case CompoundVal in all of them. Until we're confident that CompoundVal is handled properly everywhere, this solution is safer, since the entire optimization is just an implementation detail of RegionStore. <rdar://problem/13599304> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179767 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-18[analyzer] Don't crash if we cache out after making a temporary region.Jordan Rose
A C++ overloaded operator may be implemented as an instance method, and that instance method may be called on an rvalue object, which has no associated region. The analyzer handles this by creating a temporary region just for the evaluation of this call; however, it is possible that /by creating the region/, the analyzer ends up in a previously-explored state. In this case we don't need to continue along this path. This doesn't actually show any behavioral change now, but it starts being used with the next commit and prevents an assertion failure there. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179766 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-18[analyzer] Tweak getDerefExpr more to track DeclRefExprs to references.Anna Zaks
In the committed example, we now see a note that tells us when the pointer was assumed to be null. This is the only case in which getDerefExpr returned null (failed to get the dereferenced expr) throughout our regression tests. (There were multiple occurrences of this one.) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179736 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-17[analyzer] Improve dereferenced expression tracking for MemberExpr with a ↵Anna Zaks
dot and non-reference base git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179734 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-17[analyzer] Gain more precision retrieving the right SVal by specifying the ↵Anna Zaks
type of the expression. Thanks to Jordan for suggesting the fix. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179732 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-17[analyzer] Allow TrackConstraintBRVisitor to work when the value it’s ↵Anna Zaks
tracking is not live in the last node of the path We always register the visitor on a node in which the value we are tracking is live and constrained. However, the visitation can restart at a node, later on the path, in which the value is under constrained because it is no longer live. Previously, we just silently stopped tracking in that case. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179731 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-17[analyzer] Don't warn for returning void expressions in void blocks.Jordan Rose
This was slightly tricky because BlockDecls don't currently store an inferred return type. However, we can rely on the fact that blocks with inferred return types will have return statements that match the inferred type. <rdar://problem/13665798> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179699 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-16Implement CapturedStmt ASTTareq A. Siraj
CapturedStmt can be used to implement generic function outlining as described in http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-January/027540.html. CapturedStmt is not exposed to the C api. Serialization and template support are pending. Author: Wei Pan <wei.pan@intel.com> Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D370 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179615 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-16Basic support for Microsoft property declarations andJohn McCall
references thereto. Patch by Tong Shen! git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179585 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-15[analyzer] Do not crash when processing binary "?:" in C++Anna Zaks
When computing the value of ?: expression, we rely on the last expression in the previous basic block to be the resulting value of the expression. This is not the case for binary "?:" operator (GNU extension) in C++. As the last basic block has the expression for the condition subexpression, which is an R-value, whereas the true subexpression is the L-value. Note the operator evaluation just happens to work in C since the true subexpression is an R-value (like the condition subexpression). CFG is the same in C and C++ case, but the AST nodes are different, which the LValue to Rvalue conversion happening after the BinaryConditionalOperator evaluation. Changed the logic to only use the last expression from the predecessor only if it matches either true or false subexpression. Note, the logic needed fortification anyway: L and R were passed but not even used by the function. Also, change the conjureSymbolVal to correctly compute the type, when the expression is an LG-value. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179574 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-15[analyzer] Add pretty printing to CXXBaseObjectRegion.Anna Zaks
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179573 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-15[analyzer] Address code review for r179395Anna Zaks
Mostly refactoring + handle the nested fields by printing the innermost field only. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179572 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-15[analyzer] Add more specialized error messages for corner cases as per ↵Anna Zaks
Jordan's code review for r179396 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179571 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-15[analyzer] Don't assert on a temporary of pointer-to-member type.Jordan Rose
While we don't do anything intelligent with pointers-to-members today, it's perfectly legal to need a temporary of pointer-to-member type to, say, pass by const reference. Tweak an assertion to allow this. PR15742 and PR15747 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179563 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-15[analyzer] Be lazy about struct/array global invalidation too.Jordan Rose
Structs and arrays can take advantage of the single top-level global symbol optimization (described in the previous commit) just as well as scalars. No intended behavioral change. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179555 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-15[analyzer] Re-enable using global regions as a symbolic base.Jordan Rose
Now that we're invalidating global regions properly, we want to continue taking advantage of a particular optimization: if all global regions are invalidated together, we can represent the bindings of each region with a "derived region value" symbol. Essentially, this lazily links each global region with a single symbol created at invalidation time, rather than binding each region with a new symbolic value. We used to do this, but haven't been for a while; the previous commit re-enabled this code path, and this handles the fallout. <rdar://problem/13464044> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179554 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-15[analyzer] Properly invalidate global regions on opaque function calls.Jordan Rose
This fixes a regression where a call to a function we can't reason about would not actually invalidate global regions that had explicit bindings. void test_that_now_works() { globalInt = 42; clang_analyzer_eval(globalInt == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}} invalidateGlobals(); clang_analyzer_eval(globalInt == 42); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}} } This has probably been around since the initial "cluster" refactoring of RegionStore, if not longer. <rdar://problem/13464044> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179553 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-12[analyzer] Print a diagnostic note even if the region cannot be printed.Anna Zaks
There are few cases where we can track the region, but cannot print the note, which makes the testing limited. (Though, I’ve tested this manually by making all regions non-printable.) Even though the applicability is limited now, the enhancement will be more relevant as we start tracking more regions. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179396 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-12[analyzer]Print field region even when the base region is not printableAnna Zaks
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179395 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-12[analyzer] Show "Returning from ..." note at caller's depth, not callee's.Jordan Rose
Before: 1. Calling 'foo' 2. Doing something interesting 3. Returning from 'foo' 4. Some kind of error here After: 1. Calling 'foo' 2. Doing something interesting 3. Returning from 'foo' 4. Some kind of error here The location of the note is already in the caller, not the callee, so this just brings the "depth" attribute in line with that. This only affects plist diagnostic consumers (i.e. Xcode). It's necessary for Xcode to associate the control flow arrows with the right stack frame. <rdar://problem/13634363> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179351 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-12[analyzer] Don't emit extra context arrow after returning from an inlined call.Jordan Rose
In this code int getZero() { return 0; } void test() { int problem = 1 / getZero(); // expected-warning {{Division by zero}} } we generate these arrows: +-----------------+ | v int problem = 1 / getZero(); ^ | +---+ where the top one represents the control flow up to the first call, and the bottom one represents the flow to the division.* It turns out, however, that we were generating the top arrow twice, as if attempting to "set up context" after we had already returned from the call. This resulted in poor highlighting in Xcode. * Arguably the best location for the division is the '/', but that's a different problem. <rdar://problem/13326040> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179350 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-09[analyzer] Replace isIntegerType() with isIntegerOrEnumerationType().Jordan Rose
Previously, the analyzer used isIntegerType() everywhere, which uses the C definition of "integer". The C++ predicate with the same behavior is isIntegerOrUnscopedEnumerationType(). However, the analyzer is /really/ using this to ask if it's some sort of "integrally representable" type, i.e. it should include C++11 scoped enumerations as well. hasIntegerRepresentation() sounds like the right predicate, but that includes vectors, which the analyzer represents by its elements. This commit audits all uses of isIntegerType() and replaces them with the general isIntegerOrEnumerationType(), except in some specific cases where it makes sense to exclude scoped enumerations, or any enumerations. These cases now use isIntegerOrUnscopedEnumerationType() and getAs<BuiltinType>() plus BuiltinType::isInteger(). isIntegerType() is hereby banned in the analyzer - lib/StaticAnalysis and include/clang/StaticAnalysis. :-) Fixes real assertion failures. PR15703 / <rdar://problem/12350701> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179081 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-06[analyzer] When creating a trimmed graph, preserve whether a node is a sink.Jordan Rose
This is important because sometimes two nodes are identical, except the second one is a sink. This bug has probably been around for a while, but it wouldn't have been an issue in the old report graph algorithm. I'm ashamed to say I actually looked at this the first time around and thought it would never be a problem...and then didn't include an assertion to back that up. PR15684 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178944 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-05[analyzer] Remove another redundancy from trackNullOrUndefAnna Zaks
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178934 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-05[analyzer] Fix null tracking for the given test case, by using the proper ↵Anna Zaks
state and removing redundant code. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178933 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-05[analyzer] Show path diagnostic for C++ initializersAnna Zaks
Also had to modify the PostInitializer ProgramLocation to contain the field region. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178826 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-04[analyzer] Enable destructor inlining by default (c++-inlining=destructors).Jordan Rose
This turns on not only destructor inlining, but inlining of constructors for types with non-trivial destructors. Per r178516, we will still not inline the constructor or destructor of anything that looks like a container unless the analyzer-config option 'c++-container-inlining' is set to 'true'. In addition to the more precise path-sensitive model, this allows us to catch simple smart pointer issues: #include <memory> void test() { std::auto_ptr<int> releaser(new int[4]); } // memory allocated with 'new[]' should not be deleted with 'delete' <rdar://problem/12295363> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178805 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-03[analyzer] Allow tracknullOrUndef look through the ternary operator even ↵Anna Zaks
when condition is unknown Improvement of r178684 and r178685. Jordan has pointed out that I should not rely on the value of the condition to know which expression branch has been taken. It will not work in cases the branch condition is an unknown value (ex: we do not track the constraints for floats). The better way of doing this would be to find out if the current node is the right or left successor of the node that has the ternary operator as a terminator (which is how this is done in other places, like ConditionBRVisitor). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178701 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-03[analyzer] Correctly handle destructors for lifetime-extended temporaries.Jordan Rose
The lifetime of a temporary can be extended when it is immediately bound to a local reference: const Value &MyVal = Value("temporary"); In this case, the temporary object's lifetime is extended for the entire scope of the reference; at the end of the scope it is destroyed. The analyzer was modeling this improperly in two ways: - Since we don't model temporary constructors just yet, we create a fake temporary region when it comes time to "materialize" a temporary into a real object (lvalue). This wasn't taking base casts into account when the bindings being materialized was Unknown; now it always respects base casts except when the temporary region is itself a pointer. - When actually destroying the region, the analyzer did not actually load from the reference variable -- it was basically destroying the reference instead of its referent. Now it does do the load. This will be more useful whenever we finally start modeling temporaries, or at least those that get bound to local reference variables. <rdar://problem/13552274> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178697 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-03[analyzer] make peelOffOuterExpr in BugReporterVisitors recursively peel off ↵Anna Zaks
select Exprs git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178685 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-03[analyzer] Properly handle the ternary operator in trackNullOrUndefValueAnna Zaks
1) Look for the node where the condition expression is live when checking if it is constrained to true or false. 2) Fix a bug in ProgramState::isNull, which was masking the problem. When the expression is not a symbol (,which is the case when it is Unknown) return unconstrained value, instead of value constrained to “false”! (Thankfully other callers of isNull have not been effected by the bug.) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178684 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-03[analyzer] Fix typo.Anna Zaks
Thanks Jordan! git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178683 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-03[analyzer] Better model for copying of array fields in implicit copy ctors.Jordan Rose
- Find the correct region to represent the first array element when constructing a CXXConstructorCall. - If the array is trivial, model the copy with a primitive load/store. - Don't warn about the "uninitialized" subscript in the AST -- we don't use the helper variable that Sema provides. <rdar://problem/13091608> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178602 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-02Silencing warnings in MSVC due to duplicate identifiers.Aaron Ballman
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178591 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-02[analyzer] Teach invalidateRegions that regions within LazyCompoundVal need ↵Anna Zaks
to be invalidated Refactor invalidateRegions to take SVals instead of Regions as input and teach RegionStore about processing LazyCompoundVal as a top-level “escaping” value. This addresses several false positives that get triggered by the NewDelete checker, but the underlying issue is reproducible with other checkers as well (for example, MallocChecker). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178518 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-02[analyzer] For now, don't inline [cd]tors of C++ containers.Jordan Rose
This is a heuristic to make up for the fact that the analyzer doesn't model C++ containers very well. One example is modeling that 'std::distance(I, E) == 0' implies 'I == E'. In the future, it would be nice to model this explicitly, but for now it just results in a lot of false positives. The actual heuristic checks if the base type has a member named 'begin' or 'iterator'. If so, we treat the constructors and destructors of that type as opaque, rather than inlining them. This is intended to drastically reduce the number of false positives reported with experimental destructor support turned on. We can tweak the heuristic in the future, but we'd rather err on the side of false negatives for now. <rdar://problem/13497258> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178516 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-02[analyzer] Cache whether a function is generally inlineable.Jordan Rose
Certain properties of a function can determine ahead of time whether or not the function is inlineable, such as its kind, its signature, or its location. We can cache this value in the FunctionSummaries map to avoid rechecking these static properties for every call. Note that the analyzer may still decide not to inline a specific call to a function because of the particular dynamic properties of the call along the current path. No intended functionality change. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178515 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-02[analyzer] Use inline storage in the FunctionSummary DenseMap.Jordan Rose
The summaries lasted for the lifetime of the map anyway; no reason to include an extra allocation. Also, use SmallBitVector instead of BitVector to track the visited basic blocks -- most functions will have less than 64 basic blocks -- and use bitfields for the other fields to reduce the size of the structure. No functionality change. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178514 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-04-02[analyzer] Allow suppressing diagnostics reported within the 'std' namespaceJordan Rose
This is controlled by the 'suppress-c++-stdlib' analyzer-config flag. It is currently off by default. This is more suppression than we'd like to do, since obviously there can be user-caused issues within 'std', but it gives us the option to wield a large hammer to suppress false positives the user likely can't work around. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178513 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-03-30[analyzer] Restructure ExprEngine::VisitCXXNewExpr to do a bit less work.Jordan Rose
No functionality change. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178402 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-03-30[analyzer] Handle caching out while evaluating a C++ new expression.Jordan Rose
Evaluating a C++ new expression now includes generating an intermediate ExplodedNode, and this node could very well represent a previously- reachable state in the ExplodedGraph. If so, we can short-circuit the rest of the evaluation. Caught by the assertion a few lines later. <rdar://problem/13510065> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178401 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-03-29[analyzer] Address Jordan’s review of r178309 - do not register an extra ↵Anna Zaks
visitor for nil receiver We can check if the receiver is nil in the node that corresponds to the StmtPoint of the message send. At that point, the receiver is guaranteed to be live. We will find at least one unreclaimed node due to my previous commit (look for StmtPoint instead of PostStmt) and the fact that the nil receiver nodes are tagged. + a couple of extra tests. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178381 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8