| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
TemplateArgumentList. This avoids the need to pass around
pointer/length pairs of template arguments lists, and will eventually
make it easier to introduce member templates and variadic templates.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@71517 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
specialization" within a C++ template, and permit name lookup into the
current instantiation. For example, given:
template<typename T, typename U>
struct X {
typedef T type;
X* x1; // current instantiation
X<T, U> *x2; // current instantiation
X<U, T> *x3; // not current instantiation
::X<type, U> *x4; // current instantiation
X<typename X<type, U>::type, U>: *x5; // current instantiation
};
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@71471 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
declaration can now be NULL. Use cast_or_null appropriately
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@71412 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
template. The injected-class-name is either a type or a template,
depending on whether a '<' follows it. As a type, the
injected-class-name's template argument list contains its template
parameters in declaration order.
As part of this, add logic for canonicalizing declarations, and be
sure to canonicalize declarations used in template names and template
arguments.
A TagType is dependent if the declaration it references is dependent.
I'm not happy about the rather complicated protocol needed to use
ASTContext::getTemplateSpecializationType.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@71408 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@71405 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
specialization type for a dependent template name.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@71153 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
improves type identity with dependent types.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@71152 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
in C++. Fixes <rdar://problem/6815995>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@70784 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@70567 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
No functionality change (really).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68726 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68261 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
failures that involve malformed types, e.g., "typename X::foo" where
"foo" isn't a type, or "std::vector<void>" that doens't instantiate
properly.
Similarly, be a bit smarter in our handling of ambiguities that occur
in Sema::getTypeName, to eliminate duplicate error messages about
ambiguous name lookup.
This eliminates two XFAILs in test/SemaCXX, one of which was crying
out to us, trying to tell us that we were producing repeated error
messages.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68251 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
specifiers that terminate in a simple-template-id, e.g.,
typename MetaFun::template apply<T1, T2>
Also, implement template instantiation for dependent
nested-name-specifiers that involve unresolved identifiers, e.g.,
typename T::type::type
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68166 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
within nested-name-specifiers, e.g., for the "apply" in
typename MetaFun::template apply<T1, T2>::type
At present, we can't instantiate these nested-name-specifiers, so our
testing is sketchy.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68081 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
representation handles the various ways in which one can name a
template, including unqualified references ("vector"), qualified
references ("std::vector"), and dependent template names
("MetaFun::template apply").
One immediate effect of this change is that the representation of
nested-name-specifiers in type names for class template
specializations (e.g., std::vector<int>) is more accurate. Rather than
representing std::vector<int> as
std::(vector<int>)
we represent it as
(std::vector)<int>
which more closely follows the C++ grammar.
Additionally, templates are no longer represented as declarations
(DeclPtrTy) in Parse-Sema interactions. Instead, I've introduced a new
OpaquePtr type (TemplateTy) that holds the representation of a
TemplateName. This will simplify the handling of dependent
template-names, once we get there.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68074 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
pointer. Its purpose in life is to be a glorified void*, but which does not
implicitly convert to void* or other OpaquePtr's with a different UID.
Introduce Action::DeclPtrTy which is a typedef for OpaquePtr<0>. Change the
entire parser/sema interface to use DeclPtrTy instead of DeclTy*. This
makes the C++ compiler enforce that these aren't convertible to other opaque
types.
We should also convert ExprTy, StmtTy, TypeTy, AttrTy, BaseTy, etc,
but I don't plan to do that in the short term.
The one outstanding known problem with this patch is that we lose the
bitmangling optimization where ActionResult<DeclPtrTy> doesn't know how to
bitmangle the success bit into the low bit of DeclPtrTy. I will rectify
this with a subsequent patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67952 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
instantiation for C++ typename-specifiers such as
typename T::type
The parsing of typename-specifiers is relatively easy thanks to
annotation tokens. When we see the "typename", we parse the
typename-specifier and produce a typename annotation token. There are
only a few places where we need to handle this. We currently parse the
typename-specifier form that terminates in an identifier, but not the
simple-template-id form, e.g.,
typename T::template apply<U, V>
Parsing of nested-name-specifiers has a similar problem, since at this
point we don't have any representation of a class template
specialization whose template-name is unknown.
Semantic analysis is only partially complete, with some support for
template instantiation that works for simple examples.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67875 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67726 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
all the way down to ActOnClassTemplate.
Doug, Sebastian: Plz review! :)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67723 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
specializations can be treated as a template. Finally, we can parse
and process the first implementation of Fibonacci I wrote!
Note that this code does not handle all of the cases where
injected-class-names can be treated as templates. In particular,
there's an ambiguity case that we should be able to handle (but
can't), e.g.,
template <class T> struct Base { };
template <class T> struct Derived : Base<int>, Base<char> {
typename Derived::Base b; // error: ambiguous
typename Derived::Base<double> d; // OK
};
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67720 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
failure to perform a declaration. Instead, explicitly note semantic
failures that occur during template parsing with a DeclResult. Fixes
PR3872.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67659 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
of "object type" rather than the C definition of "object type". The
difference is that C's "object type" excludes incomplete types such as
struct X;
However, C's definition also makes it far too easy to use isObjectType
as a means to detect incomplete types when in fact we should use other
means (e.g., Sema::RequireCompleteType) that cope with C++ semantics,
including template instantiation.
I've already audited every use of isObjectType and isIncompleteType to
ensure that they are doing the right thing for both C and C++, so this
is patch does not change any functionality.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67648 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
types; add another use of RequireCompleteType.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67644 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
dependent qualified-ids such as
Fibonacci<N - 1>::value
where N is a template parameter. These references are "unresolved"
because the name is dependent and, therefore, cannot be resolved to a
declaration node (as we would do for a DeclRefExpr or
QualifiedDeclRefExpr). UnresolvedDeclRefExprs instantiate to
DeclRefExprs, QualifiedDeclRefExprs, etc.
Also, be a bit more careful about keeping only a single set of
specializations for a class template, and instantiating from the
definition of that template rather than a previous declaration. In
general, we need a better solution for this for all TagDecls, because
it's too easy to accidentally look at a declaration that isn't the
definition.
We can now process a simple Fibonacci computation described as a
template metaprogram.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67308 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
specialization names. This way, we keep track of sugared types like
std::vector<Real>
I believe we are now using QualifiedNameTypes everywhere we can. Next
step: QualifiedDeclRefExprs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67268 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
qualified name, e.g.,
foo::x
so that we retain the nested-name-specifier as written in the source
code and can reproduce that qualified name when printing the types
back (e.g., in diagnostics). This is PR3493, which won't be complete
until finished the other tasks mentioned near the end of this commit.
The parser's representation of nested-name-specifiers, CXXScopeSpec,
is now a bit fatter, because it needs to contain the scopes that
precede each '::' and keep track of whether the global scoping
operator '::' was at the beginning. For example, we need to keep track
of the leading '::', 'foo', and 'bar' in
::foo::bar::x
The Action's CXXScopeTy * is no longer a DeclContext *. It's now the
opaque version of the new NestedNameSpecifier, which contains a single
component of a nested-name-specifier (either a DeclContext * or a Type
*, bitmangled).
The new sugar type QualifiedNameType composes a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers with a representation of the type we're actually
referring to. At present, we only build QualifiedNameType nodes within
Sema::getTypeName. This will be extended to other type-constructing
actions (e.g., ActOnClassTemplateId).
Also on the way: QualifiedDeclRefExprs will also store a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers, so that we can print out the property
nested-name-specifier. I expect to also use this for handling
dependent names like Fibonacci<I - 1>::value.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67265 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
Type pointer. This allows our nested-name-specifiers to retain more
information about the actual spelling (e.g., which typedef did the
user name, or what exact template arguments were used in the
template-id?). It will also allow us to have dependent
nested-name-specifiers that don't map to any DeclContext.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67140 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
arguments. Eliminates a FIXME.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66993 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
uses the bitwidth and signedness of the template parameter
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66990 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
- C++ function casts, e.g., T(foo)
- sizeof(), alignof()
More importantly, this allows us to verify that we're performing
overload resolution during template instantiation, with
argument-dependent lookup and the "cached" results of name lookup from
the template definition.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66947 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
can more efficiently reconstruct an IntegerLiteral from it during template instantiation
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66833 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
context of a template-id for which we need to instantiate default
template arguments.
In the TextDiagnosticPrinter, don't suppress the caret diagnostic if
we are producing a non-note diagnostic that follows a note diagnostic
with the same location, because notes are (conceptually) a part of the
warning or error that comes before them.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66572 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
'struct A<double, int>'
In the "template instantiation depth exceeded" message, print
"-ftemplate-depth-N" rather than "-ftemplate-depth=N".
An unnamed tag type that is declared with a typedef, e.g.,
typedef struct { int x, y; } Point;
can be used as a template argument. Allow this, and check that we get
sensible pretty-printing for such things.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66560 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
such as replacing 'T' in vector<T>. There are a few aspects to this:
- Extend TemplateArgument to allow arbitrary expressions (an
Expr*), and switch ClassTemplateSpecializationType to store
TemplateArguments rather than it's own type-or-expression
representation.
- ClassTemplateSpecializationType can now store dependent types. In
that case, the canonical type is another
ClassTemplateSpecializationType (with default template arguments
expanded) rather than a declaration (we don't build Decls for
dependent types).
- Split ActOnClassTemplateId into ActOnClassTemplateId (called from
the parser) and CheckClassTemplateId (called from
ActOnClassTemplateId and InstantiateType). They're smart enough to
handle dependent types, now.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66509 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66422 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
response to attempts to diagnose an "incomplete" type. This will force
us to use DiagnoseIncompleteType more regularly (rather than looking at
isIncompleteType), but that's also a good thing.
Implicit instantiation is still very simplistic, and will create a new
definition for the class template specialization (as it should) but it
only actually instantiates the base classes and attaches
those. Actually instantiating class members will follow.
Also, instantiate the types of non-type template parameters before
checking them, allowing, e.g.,
template<typename T, T Value> struct Constant;
to work properly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65924 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
array types. Semantic checking for the construction of these types has
been factored out of GetTypeForDeclarator and into separate
subroutines (BuildPointerType, BuildReferenceType,
BuildArrayType). We'll be doing the same thing for all other types
(and declarations and expressions).
As part of this, moved the type-instantiation functions into a class
in an anonymous namespace.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65663 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
stubs for those types we don't yet know how to instantiate (everything
that isn't a template parameter!).
We now instantiate default arguments for template type parameters when
needed. This will be our testbed while I fill out the remaining
type-instantiation logic.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65649 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65641 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
nicely sugared type that shows how the user wrote the actual
specialization. This sugared type won't actually show up until we
start doing instantiations.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65577 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
know how to recover from an error, we can attach a hint to the
diagnostic that states how to modify the code, which can be one of:
- Insert some new code (a text string) at a particular source
location
- Remove the code within a given range
- Replace the code within a given range with some new code (a text
string)
Right now, we use these hints to annotate diagnostic information. For
example, if one uses the '>>' in a template argument in C++98, as in
this code:
template<int I> class B { };
B<1000 >> 2> *b1;
we'll warn that the behavior will change in C++0x. The fix is to
insert parenthese, so we use code insertion annotations to illustrate
where the parentheses go:
test.cpp:10:10: warning: use of right-shift operator ('>>') in template
argument will require parentheses in C++0x
B<1000 >> 2> *b1;
^
( )
Use of these annotations is partially implemented for HTML
diagnostics, but it's not (yet) producing valid HTML, which may be
related to PR2386, so it has been #if 0'd out.
In this future, we could consider hooking this mechanism up to the
rewriter to actually try to fix these problems during compilation (or,
after a compilation whose only errors have fixes). For now, however, I
suggest that we use these code modification hints whenever we can, so
that we get better diagnostics now and will have better coverage when
we find better ways to use this information.
This also fixes PR3410 by placing the complaint about missing tokens
just after the previous token (rather than at the location of the next
token).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65570 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
decls. Test and document the semantic location of class template
specialization definitions that occur within a scope enclosing the
scope of the class template.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65478 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
specializations. In particular:
- Make sure class template specializations have a "template<>"
header, and complain if they don't.
- Make sure class template specializations are declared/defined
within a valid context. (e.g., you can't declare a specialization
std::vector<MyType> in the global namespace).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65476 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
std::vector<int>::allocator_type
When we parse a template-id that names a type, it will become either a
template-id annotation (which is a parsed representation of a
template-id that has not yet been through semantic analysis) or a
typename annotation (where semantic analysis has resolved the
template-id to an actual type), depending on the context. We only
produce a type in contexts where we know that we only need type
information, e.g., in a type specifier. Otherwise, we create a
template-id annotation that can later be "upgraded" by transforming it
into a typename annotation when the parser needs a type. This occurs,
for example, when we've parsed "std::vector<int>" above and then see
the '::' after it. However, it means that when writing something like
this:
template<> class Outer::Inner<int> { ... };
We have two tokens to represent Outer::Inner<int>: one token for the
nested name specifier Outer::, and one template-id annotation token
for Inner<int>, which will be passed to semantic analysis to define
the class template specialization.
Most of the churn in the template tests in this patch come from an
improvement in our error recovery from ill-formed template-ids.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65467 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65169 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
(as GCC does), except when we've performed overload resolution and
found an unavailable function: in this case, we actually error.
Merge the checking of unavailable functions with the checking for
deprecated functions. This unifies a bit of code, and makes sure that
we're checking for unavailable functions in the right places. Also,
this check can cause an error. We may, eventually, want an option to
make "unavailable" warnings into errors.
Implement much of the logic needed for C++0x deleted functions, which
are effectively the same as "unavailable" functions (but always cause
an error when referenced). However, we don't have the syntax to
specify deleted functions yet :)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@64955 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
specialization of class templates, e.g.,
template<typename T> class X;
template<> class X<int> { /* blah */ };
Each specialization is a different *Decl node (naturally), and can
have different members. We keep track of forward declarations and
definitions as for other class/struct/union types.
This is only the basic framework: we still have to deal with checking
the template headers properly, improving recovery when there are
failures, handling nested name specifiers, etc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@64848 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
CXXRecordDecl that is used to represent class template
specializations. These are canonical declarations that can refer to
either an actual class template specialization in the code, e.g.,
template<> class vector<bool> { };
or to a template instantiation. However, neither of these features is
actually implemented yet, so really we're just using (and uniqing) the
declarations to make sure that, e.g., A<int> is a different type from
A<float>. Note that we carefully distinguish between what the user
wrote in the source code (e.g., "A<FLOAT>") and the semantic entity it
represents (e.g., "A<float, int>"); the former is in the sugared Type,
the latter is an actual Decl.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@64716 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@64337 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@64321 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
