| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
expression, or statement
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@82481 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@81346 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
then drop it on the floor.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@80989 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
x->Base::f
We no longer try to "enter" the context of the type that "x" points
to. Instead, we drag that object type through the parser and pass it
into the Sema routines that need to know how to perform lookup within
member access expressions.
We now implement most of the crazy name lookup rules in C++
[basic.lookup.classref] for non-templated code, including performing
lookup both in the context of the type referred to by the member
access and in the scope of the member access itself and then detecting
ambiguities when the two lookups collide (p1 and p4; p3 and p7 are
still TODO). This change also corrects our handling of name lookup
within template arguments of template-ids inside the
nested-name-specifier (p6; we used to look into the scope of the
object expression for them) and fixes PR4703.
I have disabled some tests that involve member access expressions
where the object expression has dependent type, because we don't yet
have the ability to describe dependent nested-name-specifiers starting
with an identifier.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@80843 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
their members, including member class template, member function
templates, and member classes and functions of member templates.
To actually parse the nested-name-specifiers that qualify the name of
an out-of-line definition of a member template, e.g.,
template<typename X> template<typename Y>
X Outer<X>::Inner1<Y>::foo(Y) {
return X();
}
we need to look for the template names (e.g., "Inner1") as a member of
the current instantiation (Outer<X>), even before we have entered the
scope of the current instantiation. Since we can't do this in general
(i.e., we should not be looking into all dependent
nested-name-specifiers as if they were the current instantiation), we
rely on the parser to tell us when it is parsing a declaration
specifier sequence, and, therefore, when we should consider the
current scope specifier to be a current instantiation.
Printing of complicated, dependent nested-name-specifiers may be
somewhat broken by this commit; I'll add tests for this issue and fix
the problem (if it still exists) in a subsequent commit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@80044 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@79962 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
member templates declared inside other templates. This allows us to
match out-of-line definitions of member function templates within
class templates to the declarations within the class template. We
still can't handle out-of-line definitions for member class templates,
however.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@79955 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@79912 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
elsewhere. Very slightly decouples DeclSpec users from knowing the exact
diagnostics to report, and makes it easier to provide different diagnostics in
some places.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@77990 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@77656 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
destruction of base/members for each destructor AST.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@76663 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
base/members.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@75849 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
out of line definition.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@75668 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
declaration in the AST.
The new ASTContext::getCommentForDecl function searches for a comment
that is attached to the given declaration, and returns that comment,
which may be composed of several comment blocks.
Comments are always available in an AST. However, to avoid harming
performance, we don't actually parse the comments. Rather, we keep the
source ranges of all of the comments within a large, sorted vector,
then lazily extract comments via a binary search in that vector only
when needed (which never occurs in a "normal" compile).
Comments are written to a precompiled header/AST file as a blob of
source ranges. That blob is only lazily loaded when one requests a
comment for a declaration (this never occurs in a "normal" compile).
The indexer testbed now supports comment extraction. When the
-point-at location points to a declaration with a Doxygen-style
comment, the indexer testbed prints the associated comment
block(s). See test/Index/comments.c for an example.
Some notes:
- We don't actually attempt to parse the comment blocks themselves,
beyond identifying them as Doxygen comment blocks to associate them
with a declaration.
- We won't find comment blocks that aren't adjacent to the
declaration, because we start our search based on the location of
the declaration.
- We don't go through the necessary hops to find, for example,
whether some redeclaration of a declaration has comments when our
current declaration does not. Similarly, we don't attempt to
associate a \param Foo marker in a function body comment with the
parameter named Foo (although that is certainly possible).
- Verification of my "no performance impact" claims is still "to be
done".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@74704 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
making sure we return true when annotating a function template with
explicit template arguments, but not when we don't annotate anything.)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@74383 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
it doesn't actually work yet; we just error out a bit more gracefully.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@74381 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
this case
but at least we don't crash :)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@74264 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
ActOnFunctionDeclarator for function template definitions
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@74040 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@72907 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
parser. Rather than placing all of the delayed member function
declarations and inline definitions into a single bucket corresponding
to the top-level class, we instead mirror the nesting structure of the
nested classes and place the delayed member functions into their
appropriate place. Then, when we actually parse the delayed member
function declarations, set up the scope stack the same way as it was
when we originally saw the declaration, so that we can find, e.g.,
template parameters that are in scope.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@72502 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
template class X<int>;
This also cleans up the propagation of template information through
declaration parsing, which is used to improve some diagnostics.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@71608 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
template parameters.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@71598 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
parse just a single declaration and provide a reasonable diagnostic
when the "only one declarator per template declaration" rule is
violated. This eliminates some ugly, ugly hackery where we used to
require thatn the layout of a DeclGroup of a single element be the
same as the layout of a single declaration.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@71596 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
can't track down.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@70155 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
of the range is now the ';' location. For something like this:
$ cat t2.c
#define bool int
void f(int x, int y) {
bool b = !x && y;
}
We used to produce:
$ clang-cc t2.c -ast-dump
typedef char *__builtin_va_list;
void f(int x, int y)
(CompoundStmt 0x2201f10 <t2.c:3:22, line:5:1>
(DeclStmt 0x2201ef0 <line:2:14> <----
0x2201a20 "int b =
(BinaryOperator 0x2201ed0 <line:4:10, col:16> 'int' '&&'
(UnaryOperator 0x2201e90 <col:10, col:11> 'int' prefix '!'
(DeclRefExpr 0x2201c90 <col:11> 'int' ParmVar='x' 0x2201a50))
(DeclRefExpr 0x2201eb0 <col:16> 'int' ParmVar='y' 0x2201e10))")
Now we produce:
$ clang-cc t2.c -ast-dump
typedef char *__builtin_va_list;
void f(int x, int y)
(CompoundStmt 0x2201f10 <t2.c:3:22, line:5:1>
(DeclStmt 0x2201ef0 <line:2:14, line:4:17> <------
0x2201a20 "int b =
(BinaryOperator 0x2201ed0 <col:10, col:16> 'int' '&&'
(UnaryOperator 0x2201e90 <col:10, col:11> 'int' prefix '!'
(DeclRefExpr 0x2201c90 <col:11> 'int' ParmVar='x' 0x2201a50))
(DeclRefExpr 0x2201eb0 <col:16> 'int' ParmVar='y' 0x2201e10))")
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68288 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68261 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
Plus, reword a extension warnings to avoid talking about "ISO C" when
the extension might also be available in C++ or C++0x.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68257 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
failures that involve malformed types, e.g., "typename X::foo" where
"foo" isn't a type, or "std::vector<void>" that doens't instantiate
properly.
Similarly, be a bit smarter in our handling of ambiguities that occur
in Sema::getTypeName, to eliminate duplicate error messages about
ambiguous name lookup.
This eliminates two XFAILs in test/SemaCXX, one of which was crying
out to us, trying to tell us that we were producing repeated error
messages.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68251 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
specifiers that terminate in a simple-template-id, e.g.,
typename MetaFun::template apply<T1, T2>
Also, implement template instantiation for dependent
nested-name-specifiers that involve unresolved identifiers, e.g.,
typename T::type::type
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68166 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
within nested-name-specifiers, e.g., for the "apply" in
typename MetaFun::template apply<T1, T2>::type
At present, we can't instantiate these nested-name-specifiers, so our
testing is sketchy.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68081 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
representation handles the various ways in which one can name a
template, including unqualified references ("vector"), qualified
references ("std::vector"), and dependent template names
("MetaFun::template apply").
One immediate effect of this change is that the representation of
nested-name-specifiers in type names for class template
specializations (e.g., std::vector<int>) is more accurate. Rather than
representing std::vector<int> as
std::(vector<int>)
we represent it as
(std::vector)<int>
which more closely follows the C++ grammar.
Additionally, templates are no longer represented as declarations
(DeclPtrTy) in Parse-Sema interactions. Instead, I've introduced a new
OpaquePtr type (TemplateTy) that holds the representation of a
TemplateName. This will simplify the handling of dependent
template-names, once we get there.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68074 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
into ParseSimpleDeclaration, and improve a diagnostic.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68009 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
productions (except the already broken ObjC cases like @class X,Y;) in
the parser that can produce more than one Decl return a DeclGroup instead
of a Decl, etc.
This allows elimination of the Decl::NextDeclarator field, and exposes
various clients that should look at all decls in a group, but which were
only looking at one (such as the dumper, printer, etc). These have been
fixed.
Still TODO:
1) there are some FIXME's in the code about potentially using
DeclGroup for better location info.
2) ParseObjCAtDirectives should return a DeclGroup due to @class etc.
3) I'm not sure what is going on with StmtIterator.cpp, or if it can
be radically simplified now.
4) I put a truly horrible hack in ParseTemplate.cpp.
I plan to bring up #3/4 on the mailing list, but don't plan to tackle
#1/2 in the short term.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68002 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
pointer. Its purpose in life is to be a glorified void*, but which does not
implicitly convert to void* or other OpaquePtr's with a different UID.
Introduce Action::DeclPtrTy which is a typedef for OpaquePtr<0>. Change the
entire parser/sema interface to use DeclPtrTy instead of DeclTy*. This
makes the C++ compiler enforce that these aren't convertible to other opaque
types.
We should also convert ExprTy, StmtTy, TypeTy, AttrTy, BaseTy, etc,
but I don't plan to do that in the short term.
The one outstanding known problem with this patch is that we lose the
bitmangling optimization where ActionResult<DeclPtrTy> doesn't know how to
bitmangle the success bit into the low bit of DeclPtrTy. I will rectify
this with a subsequent patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67952 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
instantiation for C++ typename-specifiers such as
typename T::type
The parsing of typename-specifiers is relatively easy thanks to
annotation tokens. When we see the "typename", we parse the
typename-specifier and produce a typename annotation token. There are
only a few places where we need to handle this. We currently parse the
typename-specifier form that terminates in an identifier, but not the
simple-template-id form, e.g.,
typename T::template apply<U, V>
Parsing of nested-name-specifiers has a similar problem, since at this
point we don't have any representation of a class template
specialization whose template-name is unknown.
Semantic analysis is only partially complete, with some support for
template instantiation that works for simple examples.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67875 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67800 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
all the way down to ActOnClassTemplate.
Doug, Sebastian: Plz review! :)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67723 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
line decls, such as:
class C {
C() { }
int a;
};
C::C() : a(10) { }
We also diagnose when initializers are used on declarations that aren't constructors:
t.cpp:1:10: error: only constructors take base initializers
void f() : a(10) { }
^
Doug and/or Sebastian: I'd appreciate a review, especially the nested-name-spec test results (from the looks of it we now match gcc in that test.)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67569 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
qualified name, e.g.,
foo::x
so that we retain the nested-name-specifier as written in the source
code and can reproduce that qualified name when printing the types
back (e.g., in diagnostics). This is PR3493, which won't be complete
until finished the other tasks mentioned near the end of this commit.
The parser's representation of nested-name-specifiers, CXXScopeSpec,
is now a bit fatter, because it needs to contain the scopes that
precede each '::' and keep track of whether the global scoping
operator '::' was at the beginning. For example, we need to keep track
of the leading '::', 'foo', and 'bar' in
::foo::bar::x
The Action's CXXScopeTy * is no longer a DeclContext *. It's now the
opaque version of the new NestedNameSpecifier, which contains a single
component of a nested-name-specifier (either a DeclContext * or a Type
*, bitmangled).
The new sugar type QualifiedNameType composes a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers with a representation of the type we're actually
referring to. At present, we only build QualifiedNameType nodes within
Sema::getTypeName. This will be extended to other type-constructing
actions (e.g., ActOnClassTemplateId).
Also on the way: QualifiedDeclRefExprs will also store a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers, so that we can print out the property
nested-name-specifier. I expect to also use this for handling
dependent names like Fibonacci<I - 1>::value.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67265 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66661 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66149 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
token.
For example:
Stack dump:
0. Program arguments: clang t.cpp
1. t.cpp:4:8: current parser token: ';'
2. t.cpp:3:1: parsing struct/union/class body 'x'
Abort
It is weird that the parser is always "underneath" any parse context
actions, but the parser is created first.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66148 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
locations that are the current tok loc. Note that inline C++ methods
have a big fixme that could cause a crash.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66113 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65645 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65641 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
useless to something more vague but hopefully more clear.
rdar://6624173
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65639 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
know how to recover from an error, we can attach a hint to the
diagnostic that states how to modify the code, which can be one of:
- Insert some new code (a text string) at a particular source
location
- Remove the code within a given range
- Replace the code within a given range with some new code (a text
string)
Right now, we use these hints to annotate diagnostic information. For
example, if one uses the '>>' in a template argument in C++98, as in
this code:
template<int I> class B { };
B<1000 >> 2> *b1;
we'll warn that the behavior will change in C++0x. The fix is to
insert parenthese, so we use code insertion annotations to illustrate
where the parentheses go:
test.cpp:10:10: warning: use of right-shift operator ('>>') in template
argument will require parentheses in C++0x
B<1000 >> 2> *b1;
^
( )
Use of these annotations is partially implemented for HTML
diagnostics, but it's not (yet) producing valid HTML, which may be
related to PR2386, so it has been #if 0'd out.
In this future, we could consider hooking this mechanism up to the
rewriter to actually try to fix these problems during compilation (or,
after a compilation whose only errors have fixes). For now, however, I
suggest that we use these code modification hints whenever we can, so
that we get better diagnostics now and will have better coverage when
we find better ways to use this information.
This also fixes PR3410 by placing the complaint about missing tokens
just after the previous token (rather than at the location of the next
token).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65570 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
std::vector<int>::allocator_type
When we parse a template-id that names a type, it will become either a
template-id annotation (which is a parsed representation of a
template-id that has not yet been through semantic analysis) or a
typename annotation (where semantic analysis has resolved the
template-id to an actual type), depending on the context. We only
produce a type in contexts where we know that we only need type
information, e.g., in a type specifier. Otherwise, we create a
template-id annotation that can later be "upgraded" by transforming it
into a typename annotation when the parser needs a type. This occurs,
for example, when we've parsed "std::vector<int>" above and then see
the '::' after it. However, it means that when writing something like
this:
template<> class Outer::Inner<int> { ... };
We have two tokens to represent Outer::Inner<int>: one token for the
nested name specifier Outer::, and one template-id annotation token
for Inner<int>, which will be passed to semantic analysis to define
the class template specialization.
Most of the churn in the template tests in this patch come from an
improvement in our error recovery from ill-formed template-ids.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65467 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
to a class template. For example, the template-id 'vector<int>' now
has a nice, sugary type in the type system. What we can do now:
- Parse template-ids like 'vector<int>' (where 'vector' names a
class template) and form proper types for them in the type system.
- Parse icky template-ids like 'A<5>' and 'A<(5 > 0)>' properly,
using (sadly) a bool in the parser to tell it whether '>' should
be treated as an operator or not.
This is a baby-step, with major problems and limitations:
- There are currently two ways that we handle template arguments
(whether they are types or expressions). These will be merged, and,
most likely, TemplateArg will disappear.
- We don't have any notion of the declaration of class template
specializations or of template instantiations, so all template-ids
are fancy names for 'int' :)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@64153 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
