1 files changed, 52 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/alignof.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/alignof.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a9de1ad07c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/alignof.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+// rdar://13784901
+
+struct S0 {
+  int x;
+  static const int test0 = __alignof__(x); // expected-error {{invalid application of 'alignof' to a field of a class still being defined}}
+  static const int test1 = __alignof__(S0::x); // expected-error {{invalid application of 'alignof' to a field of a class still being defined}}
+  auto test2() -> char(&)[__alignof__(x)]; // expected-error {{invalid application of 'alignof' to a field of a class still being defined}}
+};
+
+struct S1; // expected-note 5 {{forward declaration}}
+extern S1 s1;
+const int test3 = __alignof__(s1); // expected-error {{invalid application of 'alignof' to an incomplete type 'S1'}}
+
+struct S2 {
+  S2();
+  S1 &s;
+  int x;
+
+  int test4 = __alignof__(x); // ok
+  int test5 = __alignof__(s); // expected-error {{invalid application of 'alignof' to an incomplete type 'S1'}}
+};
+
+const int test6 = __alignof__(S2::x);
+const int test7 = __alignof__(S2::s); // expected-error {{invalid application of 'alignof' to an incomplete type 'S1'}}
+
+// Arguably, these should fail like the S1 cases do: the alignment of
+// 's2.x' should depend on the alignment of both x-within-S2 and
+// s2-within-S3 and thus require 'S3' to be complete.  If we start
+// doing the appropriate recursive walk to do that, we should make
+// sure that these cases don't explode.
+struct S3 {
+  S2 s2;
+
+  static const int test8 = __alignof__(s2.x);
+  static const int test9 = __alignof__(s2.s); // expected-error {{invalid application of 'alignof' to an incomplete type 'S1'}}
+  auto test10() -> char(&)[__alignof__(s2.x)];
+  static const int test11 = __alignof__(S3::s2.x);
+  static const int test12 = __alignof__(S3::s2.s); // expected-error {{invalid application of 'alignof' to an incomplete type 'S1'}}
+  auto test13() -> char(&)[__alignof__(s2.x)];
+};
+
+// Same reasoning as S3.
+struct S4 {
+  union {
+    int x;
+  };
+  static const int test0 = __alignof__(x);
+  static const int test1 = __alignof__(S0::x);
+  auto test2() -> char(&)[__alignof__(x)];
+};