4 files changed, 72 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/test/CodeGen/complex-init-list.c b/test/CodeGen/complex-init-list.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..819d4f9432
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/CodeGen/complex-init-list.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple=x86_64-apple-darwin10 | FileCheck %s
+
+// This file tests the clang extension which allows initializing the components
+// of a complex number individually using an initialization list.  (There is a
+// extensive description and test in test/Sema/complex-init-list.c.)
+
+_Complex float x = { 1.0f, 1.0f/0.0f };
+// CHECK: @x = global { float, float } { float 1.000000e+00, float 0x7FF0000000000000 }, align 4
+
+_Complex float f(float x, float y) { _Complex float z = { x, y }; return z; }
+// CHECK: define <2 x float> @f
+// CHECK: alloca { float, float }
+\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/test/Sema/array-init.c b/test/Sema/array-init.c
index 345ab6981b..bc958c3eea 100644
--- a/test/Sema/array-init.c
+++ b/test/Sema/array-init.c
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ void func() {
 
 void test() {
   int y1[3] = { 
-    { 1, 2, 3 } // expected-warning{{braces around scalar initializer}} expected-warning{{excess elements in scalar initializer}}
+    { 1, 2, 3 } // expected-warning{{excess elements in scalar initializer}}
   };
   int y3[4][3] = {  
     { 1, 3, 5 },
diff --git a/test/Sema/complex-init-list.c b/test/Sema/complex-init-list.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..5b5d7ce143
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/Sema/complex-init-list.c
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -verify -fsyntax-only -pedantic
+
+// This file tests the clang extension which allows initializing the components
+// of a complex number individually using an initialization list. Basically,
+// if you have an explicit init list for a complex number that contains two
+// initializers, this extension kicks in to turn it into component-wise
+// initialization.
+//
+// This extension is useful because there isn't any way to accurately build
+// a complex number at the moment besides setting the components with
+// __real__ and __imag__, which is inconvenient and not usable for constants.
+// (Of course, there are other extensions we could implement that would
+// allow this, like some sort of __builtin_build_complex.)
+//
+// FIXME: It would be a good idea to have a warnings for implicit
+// real->complex and complex->real conversions; as-is, it's way too easy
+// to get implicit conversions when they are not intended.
+
+// Basic testcase
+_Complex float valid1 = { 1.0f, 2.0f }; // expected-warning {{specifying real and imaginary components is an extension}}
+
+
+// Struct for nesting tests
+struct teststruct { _Complex float x; };
+
+
+// Random other valid stuff
+_Complex int valid2 = { 1, 2 }; // expected-warning {{complex integer}} expected-warning {{specifying real and imaginary components is an extension}}
+struct teststruct valid3 = { { 1.0f, 2.0f} }; // expected-warning {{specifying real and imaginary components is an extension}}
+_Complex float valid4[2] = { {1.0f, 1.0f}, {1.0f, 1.0f} }; // expected-warning 2 {{specifying real and imaginary components is an extension}}
+// FIXME: We need some sort of warning for valid5
+_Complex float valid5 = {1.0f, 1.0fi}; // expected-warning {{imaginary constants}} expected-warning {{specifying real and imaginary components is an extension}}
+
+
+// Random invalid stuff
+struct teststruct invalid1 = { 1, 2 }; // expected-warning {{excess elements}}
+_Complex float invalid2 = { 1, 2, 3 }; // expected-warning {{excess elements}}
+_Complex float invalid3 = {}; // expected-error {{scalar initializer cannot be empty}} expected-warning {{GNU empty initializer}}
+
+
+// Check incomplete array sizing
+_Complex float sizetest1[] = { {1.0f, 1.0f}, {1.0f, 1.0f} }; // expected-warning 2 {{specifying real and imaginary components is an extension}}
+_Complex float sizecheck1[(sizeof(sizetest1) == sizeof(*sizetest1)*2) ? 1 : -1];
+_Complex float sizetest2[] = { 1.0f, 1.0f, {1.0f, 1.0f} };  // expected-warning {{specifying real and imaginary components is an extension}}
+_Complex float sizecheck2[(sizeof(sizetest2) == sizeof(*sizetest2)*3) ? 1 : -1];
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/complex-init-list.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/complex-init-list.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e75833a37d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/complex-init-list.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -verify -fsyntax-only -pedantic
+
+// This file tests the clang extension which allows initializing the components
+// of a complex number individually using an initialization list. Basically,
+// if you have an explicit init list for a complex number that contains two
+// initializers, this extension kicks in to turn it into component-wise
+// initialization.
+// 
+// See also the testcase for the C version of this extension in
+// test/Sema/complex-init-list.c.
+
+// Basic testcase
+// (No pedantic warning is necessary because _Complex is not part of C++.)
+_Complex float valid1 = { 1.0f, 2.0f };