diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp | 6 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp index 251ffea925..352e553edb 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp @@ -357,7 +357,8 @@ Sema::CXXScopeTy *Sema::ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, // unqualified name lookup in the given scope. // FIXME: When we're instantiating a template, do we actually have to - // look in the scope of the template? Seems fishy... + // look in the scope of the template? Both EDG and GCC do it; GCC + // requires the lookup to be successful, EDG doesn't. Found = LookupName(S, &II, LookupNestedNameSpecifierName); ObjectTypeSearchedInScope = true; } @@ -366,6 +367,9 @@ Sema::CXXScopeTy *Sema::ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, // base object type or prior nested-name-specifier, so this // nested-name-specifier refers to an unknown specialization. Just build // a dependent nested-name-specifier. + if (!Prefix) + return NestedNameSpecifier::Create(Context, &II); + return NestedNameSpecifier::Create(Context, Prefix, &II); } else { // Perform unqualified name lookup in the current scope. |