1 files changed, 16 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/Sema.cpp b/lib/Sema/Sema.cpp
index 6ca8be2999..8297b3155a 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/Sema.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/Sema.cpp
@@ -378,30 +378,22 @@ void Sema::ActOnEndOfTranslationUnit() {
       }
     }
 
-    bool SomethingChanged;
-    do {
-      SomethingChanged = false;
-      
-      // If DefinedUsedVTables ends up marking any virtual member functions it
-      // might lead to more pending template instantiations, which we then need
-      // to instantiate.
-      if (DefineUsedVTables())
-        SomethingChanged = true;
-
-      // C++: Perform implicit template instantiations.
-      //
-      // FIXME: When we perform these implicit instantiations, we do not
-      // carefully keep track of the point of instantiation (C++ [temp.point]).
-      // This means that name lookup that occurs within the template
-      // instantiation will always happen at the end of the translation unit,
-      // so it will find some names that should not be found. Although this is
-      // common behavior for C++ compilers, it is technically wrong. In the
-      // future, we either need to be able to filter the results of name lookup
-      // or we need to perform template instantiations earlier.
-      if (PerformPendingInstantiations())
-        SomethingChanged = true;
-      
-    } while (SomethingChanged);
+    // If DefinedUsedVTables ends up marking any virtual member functions it
+    // might lead to more pending template instantiations, which we then need
+    // to instantiate.
+    DefineUsedVTables();
+
+    // C++: Perform implicit template instantiations.
+    //
+    // FIXME: When we perform these implicit instantiations, we do not
+    // carefully keep track of the point of instantiation (C++ [temp.point]).
+    // This means that name lookup that occurs within the template
+    // instantiation will always happen at the end of the translation unit,
+    // so it will find some names that should not be found. Although this is
+    // common behavior for C++ compilers, it is technically wrong. In the
+    // future, we either need to be able to filter the results of name lookup
+    // or we need to perform template instantiations earlier.
+    PerformPendingInstantiations();
   }
   
   // Remove file scoped decls that turned out to be used.