PR15597: Fix a confusion between the implicit exception specification and the

uninstantiated exception specification when a special member within a class
template is both defaulted and given an exception specification on its first
declaration.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178103 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 14 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-defaulted-functions.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-defaulted-functions.cpp
index 3ba03c4eee..bc03bcd2a1 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-defaulted-functions.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-defaulted-functions.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify -fcxx-exceptions %s
 
 void fn() = default; // expected-error {{only special member}}
 struct foo {
@@ -175,3 +175,16 @@ extern "C" {
  template<typename _Tp> // expected-error {{templates must have C++ linkage}}
  void PR13573(const _Tp&) = delete; // expected-error {{only functions can have deleted definitions}}
 }
+
+namespace PR15597 {
+  template<typename T> struct A {
+    A() noexcept(true) = default;
+    ~A() noexcept(true) = default;
+  };
+  template<typename T> struct B {
+    B() noexcept(false) = default; // expected-error {{does not match the calculated one}}
+    ~B() noexcept(false) = default; // expected-error {{does not match the calculated one}}
+  };
+  A<int> a;
+  B<int> b; // expected-note {{here}}
+}